This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Child Restraint Systems: Top Tether Effectiveness in Side Impact Collisions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 08, 2013 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Use of the top tether attachment in three commonly available anchor points provides added restraint of child restraint systems (CRS). Three tether attachment positions were used; floor, behind the head rest (parcel deck) and at the ceiling. The three anchor points are comparable in efficacy while no tether allows increased travel of the anthropomorphic test device (ATD) head. Two series of six tests were conducted at a max speed of 20 mph and peak deceleration of 16 G's using a deceleration sled test apparatus. The first series of tests was conducted at a 90 degree impact angle. On average there is 9% less head travel when using the tether attachment compared to not using the tether attachment, all other conditions begin equal. The second series of tests was conducted at a 73 degree impact angle, there is 15% less head travel when using the tether attachment compared to not using the tether attachment, all other conditions begin equal. Using a top tether in side impacts is more effective at restraining a child seat than not using a top tether, all things being equal. When no top tether is used with properly installed lower anchors compared to no tether and improperly installed lower anchors, there is a 21% increase at 90 degrees and a 19% increase at 73 degrees in head travel.
|Technical Paper||A Study of Rear Seat 6-year-old Dummy Kinematics in Offset Frontal Crashes|
|Journal Article||Comparison of Dummy Kinematics and Injury Response between WorldSID and ES-2 in Side Impact|
CitationNeal, J. and Brelin-Fornari, J., "Child Restraint Systems: Top Tether Effectiveness in Side Impact Collisions," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0601, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-0601.
- Jermakian , J.S. and Wells J.K. Observed Use of Tethers in Forward-Facing Child Restraint Systems Injury Prevention 17.6 2011 371 374
- Decina , L.E. , and Lococo K.H. Observed LATCH Use and Misuse Characteristics of Child Restraint Systems in Sever States Journal of Safety Research 38 2007 273 281
- Arbogast , K.B. , and Jermakian J.S. Field Use Patterns and Performance of Child Restraints Secured by Lower Anchors and Tethers for Children (LATCH) Accident Analysis and Prevention 39 2007 530 535
- FMVSS 213 S.220.127.116.11(i)
- FMVSS 213 S.10.2.2(d)
- 49 CFR Part 571 [Docket No. 02-12151]