This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Lightweighting Impacts on Fuel Economy, Cost, and Component Losses
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 08, 2013 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
In 2011, the United States imported almost half of its petroleum. Lightweighting vehicles reduces that dependency directly by decreasing the engine, braking and rolling resistance losses, and indirectly by enabling a smaller, more efficiently operating engine to provide the same performance.
The Future Automotive Systems Technology Simulator (FASTSim) tool was used to quantify these impacts. FASTSim is the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) high-level vehicle powertrain model developed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. It steps through a time versus speed drive cycle to estimate the powertrain forces required to meet the cycle. It simulates the major vehicle powertrain components and their losses. It includes a cost model based on component sizing and fuel prices.
FASTSim simulated different levels of lightweighting for four different powertrains. The four powertrains included a conventional gasoline engine vehicle, a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV), a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV), and a battery electric vehicle (EV).
Weight reductions impacted the conventional vehicle efficiency more than the HEV, PHEV and EV. Although lightweighting impacted advanced vehicle efficiency less, it reduced component cost and overall costs more. Under the assumed current battery costs, however, the PHEV and EV were still more expensive than the conventional vehicle and HEV. Assuming the DOE's battery cost target of $125/kWh and improved battery life, however, the PHEV and EV attained similar cost and lightweighting benefits. Generally, lightweighting was cost effective when it cost less than $6/kg of mass eliminated.
CitationBrooker, A., Ward, J., and Wang, L., "Lightweighting Impacts on Fuel Economy, Cost, and Component Losses," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0381, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-0381.
- U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Annual Energy Review,” Table 2.1e, September 2012, http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/showtext.cfm?t=ptb0201e, retrieved October 25, 2012.
- U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Energy in Brief: How dependent are we on foreign oil?” http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/energy_in_brief/foreign_oil_dependence.cfm?featureclicked=3, retrieved October 22, 2012.
- Labeling of Motor Vehicles: Revisions to Improve Calculation of Fuel Economy Estimates; Final Rule, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Parts 86 and 600, December 27, 2006, http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2006/December/Day-27/a9749.pdf.
- Hu, P., and Reuscher, T., “2001 National Household Travel Survey, Summary of Travel Trends,” U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, December 2004.
- Brooker, A., Thornton, M., and Rugh, J., “Technology Improvement Pathways to Cost-Effective Vehicle Electrification,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0824, 2010: doi: 10.4271/2010-01-0824.
- Duvall, M., “Batteries for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” presented at The Seattle Electric Vehicle to Grid (V2G) Forum, June 6, 2005.
- Simpson, A., “Cost Benefit Analysis of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Technology,” presented at the 22nd International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition, Yokohama, Japan, Oct. 2006, NREL/CP-540-40485, November 2006, www.nrel.gov/vehiclesandfuels/vsa/pdfs/40485.pdf.
- Yilmaz, M., Krein, P., “Review of Charging Power Levels and Infrastructure for Plug-in Electric and Hybrid Vehicles and Commentary on Unidirectional Charging,” presented at the IEEE International Electrical Vehicle Conference, March 2012.
- Rogozhin, A., Gallaher, M., Helfand, G., McManus, W., “Using indirect cost multipliers to estimate the total cost of adding new technology in the automobile industry,” International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 124, Issue 2, April 2010, Pages 360-368.
- Fine, C., and Roth, R., “Lightweight Materials for Transport: Developing a Vehicle Technology Roadmap for the Use of Lightweight Materials,” presented at the MIT Roundtable: The Future of Manufacturing Innovation - Advanced Technologies http://www.alum.mit.edu/sites/default/files/IC_assets/news/images/alumninews/Fine_Roth.pdf, March 29, 2010.
- Malen, D. E., Reddy, K., “Preliminary Vehicle Mass Estimation Using Empirical Subsystem Influence Coefficients,” June 2007, http://www.steel.org/∼/media/Files/Autosteel/Research/Lightweighting/mass_compoundingpdf.pdf, retrieved October 29, 2012.
- Francfort, J., Carlson, R., “Vehicle Mass Impact on Vehicle Losses and Fuel Economy,” presented at the 2012 DOE Vehicle Technologies Program Annual Merit Review, May 2012.
- Casadei, A., Broda, R., “Impact of Vehicle Weight Reduction on Fuel Economy for Various Vehicle Architectures,” presentation prepared for The Aluminum Association, Inc., December 2007.
- U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Highway Statistics 2005, “Annual Vehicle Distance Traveled in Miles and Related Data,” http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs05/htm/vm1.htm, posted November 2006, retrieved October 14, 2009.
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, “Transportation Energy Data Book,” Edition 29, Table 3.7, 2010.
- Research and Innovative Technology Administration Bureau of Transportation Statistics, “Table 1-11, Number of U.S. Aircraft, Vehicles, Vessels, and Other Conveyances,” http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/2002/html/table_01_11.html, retrieved October 14, 2009.
- U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), “Electric Power Monthly: Table 5.3 - Average Retail Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers,” http://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.cfm?t=epmt_5_03, release date September 24, 2012, retrieved October 29, 2012.
- Easterling, E., “In Investing, It's When You Start and When You Finish,” The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/01/02/business/20110102-metrics-graphic.html, retrieved October 29, 2012.
- Consumer Reports, “High Cost of Hybrid Vehicles, Ownership Cost Comparison,” http://www.consumerreports.org, retrieved October 14, 2009.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Test Car List Data Files,” http://www.epa.gov/otaq/cert/mpg/testcars/database/12tstcar-2012-03-05.csv, retrieved October 29, 2012.
- Lohse-Busch, H., Duoba, M., and Rask, E., “Advanced Powertrain Research Facility AVTA Nissan Leaf Testing and Analysis,” presented at the 2012 DOE Hydrogen Program and Vehicle Technologies Annual Merit Review, May 2012.
- U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, “2010 Toyota Prius-0462 Hybrid BOT Battery Test Results,” http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/avta/pdfs/hev/batterygenIIIprius0462.pdf, retrieved October 29, 2012.
- U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Nissan Leaf miles on a charge,” www.fueleconomy.gov, retrieved October 29, 2012.
- Nissan USA Q&A, “For general automotive purposes, Nissan sees a 5-year battery life,” www.nissanusa.com/leaf-electric-car, posted February 01, 2010.
- Nissan USA, “2012 Nissan Leaf SV,” http://www.nissanusa.com/leaf-electric-car/versions-specifications?next=ev_micro.section_nav, retrieved November 5, 2011.
- Consumer Reports, “Cars - Car ratings,” http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/index.htm, retrieved November 1, 2012.
- Howell, D., “Battery Status and Cost Reduction Prospects,” presented at the EV Everywhere Grand Challenge Battery Workshop, July 2012, http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/pdfs/ev_everywhere/5_howell_b.pdf.