This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Close to Stoichiometric Partially Premixed Combustion -The Benefit of Ethanol in Comparison to Conventional Fuels
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 08, 2013 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Partially Premixed Combustion, PPC, with 50% Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) at lean combustion conditions λ =1.5, has shown good efficiency and low emissions in a heavy-duty single-cylinder engine. To meet emission requirements in all loads and transient operation, aftertreatment devices are likely needed. Reducing λ to unity, when a three-way catalyst can be applied, extremely low emissions possibility exists for stoichiometric PPC. In this study, the possibility to operate clean PPC from lean condition to stoichiometric equivalence ratio with reasonable efficiency and non-excessive soot emission was investigated. Two EGR rates, 48% and 38% with two fuel rates were determined for 99.5 vol% ethanol in comparison with one gasoline fuel and Swedish diesel fuel (MK1). Engine was operated at 1250 rpm and 1600 bar injection pressure with single injection. Results revealed that efficiency was reduced and soot emission increased from lean PPC to stoichiometric PPC operation. Significant increase in soot emission and pronounced efficiency reduction makes stoichiometric diesel PPC impossible. Gasoline PPC showed the same trends but with less efficiency reduction as well as less soot emission. In contrast, ethanol PPC had the advantage with very low soot emission (below 0.1 Filter Smoke Number) and higher efficiency in close to stoichiometric operation. This implies that ethanol can be a viable alternative fuel to produce clean stoichiometric PPC associated with three-way catalyst.
CitationShen, M., Tuner, M., and Johansson, B., "Close to Stoichiometric Partially Premixed Combustion -The Benefit of Ethanol in Comparison to Conventional Fuels," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0277, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-0277.
- Chase, S., Nevin, R., Winsor, R., and Baumgard, K., “Stoichiometric Compression Ignition (SCI) Engine,” SAE Technical paper 2007-01-4224, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-4224.
- Baumgard, K. and Winsor, R., “Heavy-Duty Stoichiometric Compression Ignition Engine with Improved Fuel Economy over Alternative Technologies for Meeting 2010 On-Highway Emission - Final Report,” DE-FC-26-05NT42415.
- Pirault, J., Ryan, T., Alger, T., and Roberts, C., “Performance Predictions for High Efficiency Stoichiometric Spark Ignited Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0995, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-0995.
- Alger, T., Hanhe, S., Roberts, C., and Ryan, T., “The Heavy Duty Gasoline Engine - A Multi-Cylinder Study of a High Efficiency, Low Emission Technology,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1135, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-1135.
- Storey, J., Barone, T., Thomas, J., and Huff, S., “Exhaust Particle Characterization for Lean and Stoichiometric DI Vehicles Operating on Ethanol- Gasoline Blends,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0437, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0437.
- Noehre, C., Andersson, M., Johansson, B., and Hultqvist, A., “Characterization of Partially Premixed Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-3412, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-3412.
- Manente, V., Zander, C., Johansson, B., Tunestal, P., et al., “An Advanced Internal Combustion Engine Concept for Low Emissions and High Efficiency from Idle to Max Load Using Gasoline Partially Premixed Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-2198, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-2198.
- Manente, V., Tunestal, P., Johansson, B., and Cannella, W., “Effects of Ethanol and Different Type of Gasoline Fuels on Partially Premixed Combustion from Low to High Load,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0871, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0871.
- Kalghatgi, G., Risberg, P., and Ångström, H., “Advantages of Fuels with High Resistance to Auto-ignition in Late-injection, Low-temperature, Compression Ignition Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-3385, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-3385.
- Kalghatgi, G., Risberg, P., and Ångström, H., “Partially Pre-Mixed Auto-Ignition of Gasoline to Attain Low Smoke and Low NOX at High Load in a Compression Ignition Engine and Comparison with a Diesel Fuel,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0006, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0006.
- Hanson, R., Splitter, D., and Reitz, R., “Operating a Heavy-Duty Direct-Injection Compression Ignition Engine with Gasoline for Low Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-1442, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-1442.
- Hanson, R., Kokjohn, S., Splitter, D., and Reitz, R., “An Experimental Investigation of Fuel Reactivity Controlled PCCI Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Engine,” SAE Int. J. Engines 3(1):700-716, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0864.
- Kokjohn, S., Hanson, R., Splitter, D., and Reitz, R., “Experiments and Modeling of Dual-Fuel HCCI and PCCI Combustion Using In-Cylinder Fuel Blending,” SAE Int. J. Engines 2(2):24-39, 2010, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2647.
- Manente, V., Johansson, B., Tunestal, P., and Cannella, W., “Effects of Different Type of Gasoline Fuels on Heavy Duty Partially Premixed Combustion,” SAE Int. J. Engines 2(2):71-88, 2010, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2668.
- European emission standards. Available at: http://www.dieselnet.com/standards.
- Fridriksson, H., Sunden, B., Hajireza, S. and Tuner, M., “CFD Investigation of Heat Transfer in a Diesel Engine with Diesel and PPC Combustion Modes,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1838,2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-1838.
- Miles, P.C., Choi, D., Pickett, L.M., Singh, I.P., Henein, N., Rempelewert, B.H., Yun, H., and Reitz, R.D., “Rate- Limiting Processes in Late-Injection Low-Temperature Diesel Combustion Regimes,” Thiesel, Valencia, Spain, 2004
- Hu, C., Jian-Xin, W., Shi-Jin, S., Xin-Liang, A. et al., “Effects of Ethanol in Ester-Ethanol-Diesel Blended Fuels on Spray Behavior and PM Emission,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0236, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-0236.
- Solaka, H., Aronsson, U., Johansson, B. and Tuner, M., “Investigation of Partially Premixed Combustion Characteristics in Low Load Range with Regards to Fuel Octane Number in a Light-Duty Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0684, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0684.
- Hirao, O., Pefley, R.K., “Performance and Exhaust Clarification,” Present and Future Automotive Fuels, John Wiley and Sons Inc., 1988. ISBN 0-471-80259-X.
- Horn, U., Persson, H., Egnell, R., Andersson, Ö. et al., “The Influence of Fuel Properties on Transient Liquid- Phase Spray Geometry and on Cl-Combustion Characteristics,” SAE Int. J. Engines 2(2):300-311, 2010, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2774.
- Kook, S. and Pickett, L., “Effect of Fuel Volatility and Ignition Quality on Combustion and Soot Formation at Fixed Premixing Conditions,” SAE Int. J. Engines 2(2):11-23, 2010, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2643.
- Aronsson, U., Chartier, C., Andersson, Ö., Johansson, B. et al., “Analysis of EGR Effects on the Soot Distribution in a Heavy Duty Diesel Engine using Time-Resolved Laser Induced Incandescence,” SAE Int. J. Engines 3(2):137-155, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-2104.
- Tao, F., Liu, Y., RempelEwert, B., Foster, D. et al., “Modeling the Effects of EGR and Injection Pressure on Soot Formation in a High-Speed Direct-Injection (HSDI) Diesel Engine Using a Multi-Step Phenomenological Soot Model,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0121, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-0121.
- Akihama, K., Takatori, Y., Inagaki, K., Sasaki, S. et al., “Mechanism of the Smokeless Rich Diesel Combustion by Reducing Temperature,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0655, 2001, doi:10.4271/2001-01-0655.