This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Effect of Pretensioning and Age on Torso Rollout in Restrained Human Volunteers in Far-Side Lateral and Oblique Loading
Published October 29, 2012 by The Stapp Association in United States
Annotation ability available
Far-side side impact loading of a seat belt restrained occupant has been shown to lead to torso slip out of the shoulder belt. A pretensioned seat belt may provide an effective countermeasure to torso rollout; however the effectiveness may vary with age due to increased flexibility of the pediatric spine compared to adults. To explore this effect, low-speed lateral (90°) and oblique (60°) sled tests were conducted using male human volunteers (20 subjects: 9-14 years old, 10 subjects: 18-30 years old), in which the crash pulse safety envelope was defined from an amusement park bumper-car impact. Each subject was restrained by a lap and shoulder belt system equipped with an electromechanical motorized seat belt retractor (EMSR) and photo-reflective targets were attached to a tight-fitting headpiece or adhered to the skin overlying key skeletal landmarks. Each subject was randomly assigned to either the 60° or 90° direction and was exposed to 4 test conditions - arms up (with hands on their knees) with EMSR on, arms down (with hands low on the hips) with EMSR on, arms up with EMSR off, arms down with EMSR off. The effect of age and pretensioning on the following outcomes was quantified: 1) lateral and forward displacement of the torso, 2) torso rollout angle projected onto three orthogonal planes, and 3) resultant belt-sternal distance.
The effect of pretensioning on torso containment within the shoulder belt was strong in both impact directions across all metrics evaluated. EMSR activation significantly reduced lateral displacement of the suprasternal notch (∼100 mm, p<0.0001), coronal projection of the torso rollout angle (∼15°, p<0.0001), and belt sternal distance when the arms were down (∼50 mm, p<0.05). The benefit of pretensioning was achieved by early engagement of the torso by the shoulder belt. An added benefit of pretensioning was the ability to make similar the torso kinematics across a range of anthropometries as assessed within and across age groups. These results can serve as a data set for validating the responses of restrained ATDs and computational human models to low severity far side collisions, in particular the interaction between the torso and the shoulder belt.
- Kristy B. Arbogast - Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- Emily A. Mathews - Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- Thomas Seacrist - Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- Matthew R. Maltese - Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- Rachel Hammond - Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- Sriram Balasubramanian - Drexel University
- Richard W. Kent - Drexel University
- Hiromasa Tanji - Takata Corporation
- Schuyler St. Lawrence - Takata Corporation
- Kazuo Higuchi - Takata Corporation
CitationArbogast, K., Mathews, E., Seacrist, T., Maltese, M. et al., "The Effect of Pretensioning and Age on Torso Rollout in Restrained Human Volunteers in Far-Side Lateral and Oblique Loading," SAE Technical Paper 2012-22-0012, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-22-0012.
- Adomeit D, Goegler H, Vu Han V. Expected Belt-Specific Injury Patterns Dependent on the Angle of Impact. 3rd International Conference on Impact Trauma, International Research Council on Biokinetics of Impacts. pp. 242-250; 1977.
- Arbogast KB, Balasubramanian S, Seacrist T, Maltese MR, Garcia-Espana JF, Hopely T, Constans E, Lopez-Valdes FJ, Kent RW, Tanji H, Higuchi K. (2009) Comparison of Kinematic Responses of the Head and Spine for Children and Adults in Low-Speed Frontal Sled Tests. Stapp Car Crash Journal 53: 329-372.
- Augenstein J, Perdeck E, Martin P, Bowen J, Stratton J, Horton T, Singer M, Digges K, Steps J. (2000) Injuries to Restrained Occupants in Far-Side Crashes. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med 44: 57-66.
- Bose D, Crandall JR, Untaroiu CD, Maslen EH. (2010) Influence of precollision occupant parameters on injury outcome in a frontal collision. Accid Anal Prev. 42:1398-1407.
- Bostrom O, Fildes B, Morris A, Sparke L, Smith S, Judd R. (2003) A cost effective far side crash simulation. Int. J. of Crashworthiness, Vol 8, No 3, pp 307-313.
- Comeau A. (2010) Age-related Changes in Geometric Characteristics of the Pediatric Thoracic Cage and Comparison of Thorax Shape with a Pediatric CPR Manikin. Masters thesis. Drexel University.
- Digges K and Dalmotas D. (2001) Injuries to restrained occupants in far side crashes. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Amsterdam.
- Douglass C, Fildes B, Gibson T. (2011) Modeling Occupants in Far-Side Impacts, Traffic Injury Prevention, 12:5, 508-517.
- Douglass CA, Fildes BN, Gibson TJ, Bostrom O, Pintar FA. (2007) Factors influencing occupant-to-seat belt interaction in far side crashes. Annual Proceedings, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine 51: 319-339.
- Fildes B N, Lane J C, Lenard J, and Vulcan AP (1991) Passenger Cars and Occupant Injury. Monash University Accident Research Centre, CR95.
- Fildes B, Sparke L, Bostrom O, Pintar F, Yoganandan N, Morris A. (2002) Suitability of current side impact test dummies in far side impacts. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact. Munich, Germany.
- Fildes BF, Lane JC, Lenard J, Vulcan AP. (1994) Passenger Cars and Occupant Injury: Side Impact Crashes. Federal Office of Road Safety, Canberra, Australia. Report CR 134.
- Forman, J, Michaelson, J, Kent, R, Kuppa, S, Bostrom, O. (2008) Occupant Restraint in the Rear Seat:ATD Responses to Standard and Pretensioning, Force-Limiting Belt Restraints. Annu. Proc. Assoc. Adv. Automot. Med. 52: 141-154.
- Frampton R, Welsh R, Thomas P, Fay P. (2000) The Importance of Non-Struck Side Occupants in Side Collisions. Journal of Crash Prevention and Injury Control, Vol 2, 2:151-163.
- Gabler HC, Digges K, Fildes BN, Sparke L. (2005) Side Impact Injury Risk for Belted Far Side Passenger Vehicle Occupants. SAE World Congress 2005-01-0287.
- Gayzik FS, Yu MM, Danelson KA, Slice DE, Stitzel JD. (2008) Quantification of age-related shape change of the human rib cage through geometric morphometrics. J Biomech. 41(7):1545-54.
- Greaves LL, Van Toen C, Melnyk A, Koenig L, Zhu Q, Tredwell S, Mulpuri K, Cripton PA. (2009) Pediatric and adult three-dimensional cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and sex through overall motion. Spine 34(16):1650-7.
- Grime G. (1979) A review of research on the protection afforded to occupants of cars by seat belts which provide upper torso restraint. Accid Anal Prev. 11:293-306.
- Grivas TB, Burwell RG, Purdue M, Webb JK, Moulton A. (1991) A segmental analysis of thoracic shape in chest radiographs of children. Changes related to spinal level, age, sex, side and significance for lung growth and scoliosis. J Anat. 178:21-38.
- Horsch J, Schneider D, Kroell C. (1979) Response of belt restrained subjects in simulated lateral impact. In: Proceedings of 23rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, Warrendale, Pa.
- Horsch J. (1980) Occupant Dynamics as a Function of Impact Angle and Belt Restraint. Proceedings of the 24th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper 801310, pp. 417-438.
- Kasai T, Ikata T, Katoh S, Miyake R, Tsubo M. (1996) Growth of the Cervical Spine With Special Reference to Its Lordosis and Mobility. Spine 21(18): 2067-2073.
- Kent R, Lee SH, Darvish K, Wang S, Poster CS, Lange AW, Brede C, Lange D, Matsuoka F. (2005) Structural and material changes in the aging thorax and their role in crash protection for older occupants. Stapp Car Crash J. 49:231-49.
- Kent RW, Purtsezov SV, Pilkey WD. (2007) Limiting performance analysis of a seat belt system with slack. Int J Impact Eng. 34:1382-1395.
- Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Maiman DJ, Kuppa S. (2000) Biomechanical study of pediatric human cervical spine: a finite element approach. J Biomech Eng. 122(1):60-71.
- Mackay G, Hill J, Parkin S, Munns J. (1993) Restrained Occupants on the Nonstruck Side in Lateral Collisions. Accident Analysis and Prevention. Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 147-152.
- Maltese MR, Locey CM, Jermakian JS, Arbogast KB (2009) In-Depth Field Investigations of Belt-Restrained Children in Farside Crashes. Proceedings of the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference, Stuttgart, Germany.
- McGowan DP, Bernhardt White AA III. (1995) Biomechanics of the juvenile spine. In Disorders of the Pediatric Spine, Pang D, ed., pp. 27-50. Raven Press, Ltd., New York.
- Michaelson, J, Forman, J, Kent, R, and Kuppa, S. (2008) Rear seat occupant safety: kinematics and injury of PMHS restrained by a standard 3-point belt in frontal crashes. Stapp Car Crash J 52: 295-325.
- Mitzkus JE, Eyrainer H. (1984) Three-Point Belt Improvements for Increased Occupant Protection. Warrendale, Pa: SAE International.
- Nuckley DJ, Hersted SM, Eck MP, Ching RP, (2005). Effect of displacement rate on the tensile mechanics of pediatric cervical functional spinal units. Journal of Biomechanics 38: 2266-75.
- Pintar F, Yoganandan N, Stemper B, et al. (2007) Comparison of PMHS, WorldSID, and THOR-NT responses in simulated far side impact. Proceedings of 51st Stapp Car Crash Conference.
- Seacrist T, Saffioti J, Balasubramanian S, Kadlowec J, Sterner R, García-España JF, Arbogast KB, Maltese MR. (2012) Passive cervical spine flexion: the effect of age and gender. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 27(4):326-33.
- Stolinski R, Grzebieta R, Fildes B. (1998) Side Impact Protection - Occupants in the Far-Side Seat, International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol.3 No. 2, pp 93-122.
- Stolinski R, Grzebieta RH, Fildes BN, Judd R, Wawrzynczak J, Gray I, McGrath P, Case M. (1999) Response of Far side Occupants in Car-To-Car Impacts With Standard and Modified Restraint Systems Using Hybrid III and US-SID. SAE paper 1999-01-1321.
- Stolinski, R., Grzebieta R., et al. (1998). Vehicle farside impact crashes. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Windsor, Canada.
- Törnvall F, Svensson M, Davidsson J, Flögard A, Kallieris D, Haland Y. (2005) Frontal Impact Dummy Kinematics in Oblique Frontal Collisions: Evaluation Against Post Mortem Human Subject Test Data. Traffic Injury Prevention, 6:340-350.
- Viano DC and Parenteau CS (2010) Severe Injury to Near- and Far-Seated Occupants in Side Impacts by Crash Severity and Belt Use, Traffic Injury Prevention, 11:1, 69-78.
- Viano DC, Parenteau CS, Burnett R. (2012): Influence of Belt Pretensioning on Dummy Responses in 40 km/h Rear-Impact Sled Tests, Traffic Injury Prevention, 13:1, 65-71.
- Viano DC. (1988) Limits and challenges of crash protection. Accid Anal Prev. 20:421-429.
- Walz M. (2004) NCAP test improvements with pretensioners and load limiters. Traffic Inj Prev. 5(1):18-25.
- Zellmer, H., Luhrs, S., and Bruggermann, K. (1998) Optimized restraint systems for rear seat passengers. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles.