This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Coastdown Coefficient Analysis of Heavy-Duty Vehicles and Application to the Examination of the Effects of Grade and Other Parameters on Fuel Consumption
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 24, 2012 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
To perform coastdown tests on heavy-duty trucks, both long acceleration and coasting distances are required. It is very difficult to find long flat stretches of road to conduct these tests; for a Class 8 truck loaded to 80,000 lb, about 7 miles of road is needed to complete the coastdown tests. In the present study, a method for obtaining coastdown coefficients from data taken on a road of variable grade is presented. To this end, a computer code was written to provide a fast solution for the coastdown coefficients. Class 7 and Class 8 trucks were tested with three different weight configurations: empty, “cubed-out” (fully loaded but with a payload of moderate density), and “weighed-out” (loaded to the maximum permissible weight). To validate the method used to extract coastdown coefficients for tests on a roadway with variable grade, tests were also performed using a 2008 Ford F-150 light-duty pickup for which the present coastdown coefficients were compared to those available from the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
Additionally, the effect of the coastdown coefficients on the fuel consumption of Class 7 and Class 8 trucks is discussed, where the coastdown coefficients were among the input parameters to the University of Texas Fuel Economy Model. This vehicle simulation software was developed for the Texas Department of Transportation to estimate the fuel consumption of both light-duty and heavy-duty vehicles.
CitationAtes, M. and Matthews, R., "Coastdown Coefficient Analysis of Heavy-Duty Vehicles and Application to the Examination of the Effects of Grade and Other Parameters on Fuel Consumption," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-2051, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-2051.
- Welter, D., Ates, M., Loftus-Otway, L., Matthews, R., and Harrison, R., “Estimating Texas Motor Vehicle Operating Costs,” The University of Texas at Austin, Center for Transportation Research, Austin, Texas Department of Transportation Report N0. 5974-1, FHWA/TX-11/0-5974-1, 2009.
- Matthews, R. D. et al., “Estimating Texas Motor Vehicle Operating Costs: Final Report,” The University of Texas, Center for Transportation Research, 2011.
- Ates, Murat, “Fuel Economy Modeling of Light-Duty and Heavy-Duty Vehicles, and Coastdown Study,” The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Master's Thesis 2009.
- Matthews, R. D., Internal Combustion Engines and Automotive Engineering., 2011, Draft Textbook, to be published by SAE International.
- “General compliance provisions for control of air pollution from new and in-use light-duty vehicles, light-duty trucks, and complete Otto-cycle heavy-duty vehicles,” Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Part 86, Subpart S,.
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice, “Road Load Measurement and Dynamometer Simulation Using Coastdown Techniques,” SAE Standard J1263, Reaf. 1996.
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice, “Stepwise Coastdown Methodology for Measuring Tire Rolling Resistance,” SAE Standard J2452, Issued June 1999.
- Kelly, K. J., “Modeling Tools for Predicting the Impact of Rolling Resistance on Energy Usage and Fuel Efficiency for Realistic Driving Cycles,” in International Tire Exhibition and Conference, 2002.
- Wikipedia, “Automobile Manufacturers Association,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_Manufacturers_Association, Jun. 2012.
- Hackett, J., Williams, J., Baker, J., and Wallis, S., “On the Influence of Ground Movement and Wheel Rotation in Tests on Modern Car Shapes,” SAE Technical Paper 870245, 1987, doi: 10.4271/870245.
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice, “Road Load Measurement Using Onboard Anemometry and Coastdown Techniques,” SAE Standard J2263, Rev. Dec. 2008.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Annual Certification Test Results & Data,” http://www.epa.gov/otaq/crttst.htm, Jun. 2012.
- “Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register Vol. 76, No. 179, 2011.
- Petrushov, V., “Coast Down Method in Time-Distance Variables,” SAE Technical Paper 970408, 1997, doi: 10.4271/970408.
- Petrushov, V. A., “Improvement in vehicle aerodynamic drag and rolling resistance determination from coast-down tests,” Journal of Automobile Engineering, pp. 369-380, 1998.
- Nam, Edward K.; Giannelli, Robert, “Fuel Consumption Modeling of Conventional and Advanced Technology Vehicles in the Physical Emission Rate Estimator (PERE),” EPA, Draft EPA420-P-05-001, February 2005.
- Honeywell, “Honeywell TE923W Professional Weather Station with Remote Control,” http://www.honeywellcentral.com/ssi/pdf/honeywell/TE923W.pdf, Jun. 2012.
- Haenni Scales, “Wheel Load Scale WL 101,” http://www.haenni-scales.ch/e/produkte/pdf/W1_110_E.pdf, Jun. 2012.
- Antx, “Messenger,” http://www.antx.com/Products/Messenger/index.htm, Jun. 2012.
- GlobalSat, “DG-100 GPS Data Logger,” http://www.usglobalsat.com/store/download/25/dg100_ds_ug.pdf, Jun. 2012.
- Yasin, T., “The Analytical Basis of Automobile Coastdown Testing,” SAE Technical Paper 780334, 1978, doi: 10.4271/780334.
- MATLAB, “lsqcurvefit,” http://www.mathworks.com/help/toolbox/optim/ug/lsqcurvefit.html, Apr. 2012.
- Petrushov, V., “Coast Down Method in Time and Distance Variables for Tire Rolling Resistance Determination,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0072, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-0072.
- DG Technologies, “DPA 4 Plus,” http://www.dgtech.com/product/dpa4plus/flier/dpa4plus_Flyer_2012.pdf, Jun. 2012.