This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
High Speed Video Measurements of a Heated Tip Urea Injector Spray
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 10, 2012 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The recent implementation of new rounds of stringent nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions reduction legislation in Europe and North America is driving the introduction of new automotive exhaust aftertreatment systems.
One of these technologies comprises a catalyst that facilitates the reactions of ammonia (NH₃) with the exhaust nitrogen oxides (NOx) to produce nitrogen (N₂) and water (H₂O). This technology is referred to as Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR). The ammonia is delivered by a separate fluid supply and injection system to the exhaust in the form of AUS-32 (Aqueous Urea Solution), and is also known under its commercial name of AdBlue® in Europe, and DEF - Diesel Exhaust Fluid - in the USA.
The development and application of current production AUS-32 injection systems typically rely on spray diagnostics techniques that were implemented for the gasoline port injector. These data are often obtained under standard room temperature conditions. These data are then used as initial conditions for Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations.
Up until the present, there had been only limited information about urea injector spray quality as the fluid temperature in the injector increased to typical hot levels in the exhaust-mount urea injection applications. This paper presents results from high-speed video imaging of an AUS-32 injector spray simulating the hot conditions at the injector spray exit for an exhaust injection application.
The results show substantial structural differences in the static spray between room temperature conditions, and conditions where the fluid temperature is approaching and exceeding 100°C. There are also noticeable differences in the post injection phase, which are typically not taken into account by the CFD community, but which could have a significant impact on mixing calculations and prediction of deposits behavior.
The high-speed video imaging setup and results for various spray configurations are described in this paper. The implications for better understanding of spray-gas mixing and deposits formation are also discussed.
Citationvan Vuuren, N. and Sayar, H., "High Speed Video Measurements of a Heated Tip Urea Injector Spray," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1747, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-1747.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
- Koebel, M., Elsener, M., Kleemann, M.. “Urea-SCR: A promising technique to reduce NOx emissions from automotive diesel engines.” Catalysis Today, 335-345, 2000.
- Schaber, Peter M., Colson, James, Higgins, Steven, Dietz, Ed, Thielen, Daniel, Anspach, Bill, and Brauer, Jonathan. “Study of the urea thermal decomposition (pyrolysis) reaction and importance to cyanuric acid production.” American Laboratory, August 1999, pp. 13-21.
- Schaber, Peter M., Colson, James, Higgins, Steven, Thielen, Daniel, Anspach, Bill, Brauer, Jonathan. “Thermal Decomposition (Pyrolysis) of Urea in an Open Reactor Vessel.” Thermochimica Acta 424, 131-142, 2004.
- Way, P., Viswanathan, K., Preethi, P., Gilb, A. et al., “SCR Performance Optimization Through Advancements in Aftertreatment Packaging,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0633, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-0633.
- Lenz, H. P. Mixture Formation in Spark-Ignition Engines. New York - Wien: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
- Birkhold, F., Meingast, U., Wassermann, P., and Deutschmann, O., “Analysis of the Injection of Urea-Water-Solution for Automotive SCR DeNOx-Systems: Modeling of Two-Phase Flow and Spray/Wall-Interaction,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0643, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-0643.
- Oesterle, J., Calvo, S., Damson, B., Feyl, G. et al., “Urea Systems in Focus - New Challenges and Solutions in the Development of Car and Commercial Vehicle Exhaust Systems,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-1186, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-1186.
- Maass, J., Eppler, A., Scholz, J., Gentgen, H., Grumbrecht, F., Marohn, R.. “Influences of AdBlue® spray targeting and mixing devices on the UWS distribution upstream of the SCR catalyst.” Proceedings of IMechE - Fuel Systems for IC Engines, pp.21-41, IMechE, London, UK, March 2012.
- Kim, Joo Youn, Ryu, Seung Hyup, Ha, Ji Soo. “Numerical Prediction on the Characteristics of Spray-Induced Mixing and Thermal Decomposition of Urea Solution in SCR System.” ICEF2004-889, Proceedings of ICEF04, 2004 Fall Technical Conference of the ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division, Long Beach, CA. ASME, October 2004.
- Munnannur, A. and Liu, Z., “Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for DEF Injection and Urea Decomposition in Mobile SCR DeNOx Systems,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0889, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0889.
- Terra Industries. “Urea and Urea Solution, Storage, Handling and Distribution.” 2006.
- Benjamin, S.F., Roberts, C.A.. “Significance of droplet size when injecting aqueous urea into a Selective Catalytic Reduction after-treatment system in a light-duty Diesel exhaust.” Proceedings of IMechE - Fuel Systems for IC Engines, pp.43-60, IMechE, London, UK, March 2012.