This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Experimental Evaluation of Lean-burn and EGR as Load Control Strategies for Methanol Engines
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 16, 2012 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The use of light alcohols as SI engine fuels can help to increase energy security and offer the prospect of carbon neutral transport. These fuels enable improvements in engine performance and efficiency as several investigations have demonstrated. Further improvements in efficiency can be expected when switching from throttled stoichiometric operation to strategies using mixture richness or exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) to control load while maintaining wide open throttle (WOT).
In this work the viability of throttleless load control using EGR (WOT EGR) or mixture richness (WOT lean burn) as operating strategies for methanol engines was experimentally verified. Experiments performed on a single-cylinder engine confirmed that the EGR dilution and lean burn limit of methanol are significantly higher than for gasoline. On methanol, both alternative load control strategies enable relative indicated efficiency improvements of about 5% compared to throttled stoichiometric operation. This is mainly due to the absence of throttling losses, reduced cooling and dissociation losses caused by the lower in-cylinder temperatures obtained through dilution. On gasoline, the efficiency benefits are limited because of the slow burn rates and high cyclic variability associated with dilution. The reduced in-cylinder temperatures also allow a significant decrease in engine-out NOx emissions, but this is not sufficient to justify the loss in three-way catalyst (TWC) efficiency associated with lean combustion.
Based on these results, it was concluded that the WOT EGR load control strategy seems more promising as it allows to significantly increase the part load efficiency without sacrificing in terms of tailpipe emissions. A second series of experiments was carried out on an engine more suitable for EGR dilution. This engine was derived from a four-cylinder turbocharged diesel engine and had a compression ratio of 19.5:1. This elevated compression ratio, in combination with turbocharging and high levels of in-cylinder turbulence allowed to raise the burning rates enough to use EGR in levels up to 50% with limited cycle-to-cycle variation. Throttleless load control was possible down to 3 bar BMEP in this way.
Thanks to the elevated compression ratio peak brake thermal efficiencies of up to 42% were obtained. At part loads, relative efficiency improvements up to 20% were achieved and the engine-out NOx emissions were cut down to values that are negligible compared to throttled stoichiometric load control. These results confirm that WOT EGR operation is an interesting load control strategy for dedicated methanol engines, provided that the engine design lends itself to high dilution levels.
CitationVancoillie, J., Sileghem, L., Van de Ginste, M., Demuynck, J. et al., "Experimental Evaluation of Lean-burn and EGR as Load Control Strategies for Methanol Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1283, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-1283.
- Pearson, R.J., Turner, J.W.G., and Peck, A.J., “Gasoline-ethanol-methanol tri-fuel vehicle development and its role in expediting sustainable organic fuels for transport”, presented at IMechE Low Carbon Vehicles Conference, London, UK, 2009.
- Specht, M. and Bandi, A., “Renewable carbon-based transportation fuels”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 3C, 414-482, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 2006.
- Olah, G.A., Goeppert, A., and Prakash, G.K., “Beyond Oil and Gas: the Methanol Economy.”, Wiley-VCH Verlag CmbH & Co., KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2006.
- Allen, R., Baker, N., Keating, E., Negri, J. et al., “IRL Aurora V8 Design and Development,” SAE Technical Paper 983037, 1998, doi: 10.4271/983037.
- Verhelst, S. and Wallner, T., “Hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engines”, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 35(6), p. 490-527, 2009.
- Vancoillie, J. and Verhelst, S., “Modeling the combustion of light alcohols in SI engines: a preliminary study”, presented at FISITA 2010 World Automotive Congress, Budapest, Hungary, 2010.
- Brusstar, M., Stuhldreher, M., Swain, D., and Pidgeon, W., “High Efficiency and Low Emissions from a Port-Injected Engine with Neat Alcohol Fuels,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-2743, 2002, doi:10.4271/2002-01-2743.
- Neame, G., Gardiner, D., Mallory, R., Rao, V. et al., “Improving the Fuel Economy of Stoichiometrically Fuelled S.I. Engines by Means of EGR and Enhanced Ignition - A Comparison of Gasoline, Methanol and Natural Gas,” SAE Technical Paper 952376, 1995, doi: 10.4271/952376.
- Abd-Alla, G.H., “Using exhaust gas recirculation in internal combustion engines: a review”, Energy Conversion and Management, 43(8), p. 1027-1042, 2002.
- Pannone, G. and Johnson, R., “Methanol as a Fuel for a Lean Turbocharged Spark ignition Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 890435, 1989, doi: 10.4271/890435.
- Heywood, J.B., “Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals”, McGraw-Hill series in mechanical engineering, MacGraw-Hill, New York, 1988.
- Vancoillie, J., Verhelst, S., and Demuynck, J., “Laminar Burning Velocity Correlations for Methanol-Air and Ethanol-Air Mixtures Valid at SI Engine Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0846, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-0846.
- Germane, G., Wood, C., and Hess, C., “Lean Combustion in Spark-Ignited Internal Combustion Engines - A Review,” SAE Technical Paper 831694, 1983, doi: 10.4271/831694.
- Dunn-Rankin, D., “Lean combustion: technology and control”, Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 2008.
- Turner, J., Pearson, R., Holland, B., and Peck, R., “Alcohol-Based Fuels in High Performance Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0056, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0056.
- Wallner, T. and Frazee, R., “Study of Regulated and Non-Regulated Emissions from Combustion of Gasoline, Alcohol Fuels and their Blends in a DI-SI Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1571, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-1571.
- Vancoillie, J., et al., “Efficiency Comparison Between Hydrogen, Methanol And Gasoline On A Production-Type Four-Cylinder Engine”, presented at 13th EAEC European Automotive Conference, Valencia, 2011.