This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Multi-Objective Adjoint Optimization of Intake Port Geometry
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 16, 2012 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Meeting the stringent efficiency demands of next generation direct injection engines requires not only optimization of the injection system and combustion chamber, but also an optimal in-cylinder swirling charge flow. This charge motion is largely determined by the shape of the intake port arm geometry and the valve position.
In this paper, we outline an extensible methodology implemented in OPENFOAM® for multi-objective geometry optimization based on the continuous adjoint. The adjoint method has a large advantage over traditional optimization approaches in that its cost is not dependent upon the number of parameters being optimized. This characteristic can be used to treat every cell in the computational domain as a tunable parameter - effectively switching cells "on" or "off" depending on whether this action will help improve the objectives. Unlike CAD-based parameter optimization, the adjoint approach starts from a supplied design space and then systematically removes all elements counter-productive to the design objectives. The final design is then the fluid volume left over after all the counter-productive elements have been blocked.
The adjoint system is implemented as an adjunct to a compressible steady state flow solver with the ability to maximize the swirl in a target volume while minimizing the pressure loss of the system. The tool is used to optimize the shape of the intake port arms of a combustion chamber in a static flow test configuration. A range of results were produced at different weightings of the pressure loss and swirl objectives and the ability to generate a trade-off curve between the objectives is demonstrated. At the high end, an increase in swirl of up to 250% was observed for modest increases in pressure loss, unequivocally proving the effectiveness of the new methodology.
|Journal Article||Development of CFD Inverse Analysis Technology Using the Transient Adjoint Method and Its Application to Engine In-Cylinder Flow|
|Technical Paper||Study on Effect of Engine Operating Parameters on Flame Characteristics|
Citationde Villiers, E. and Othmer, C., "Multi-Objective Adjoint Optimization of Intake Port Geometry," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0905, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0905.
- Röttger, G. Lozano, M.T. Abad Kiel, M. Willand, J. Automated Intake Port Geometry Optimisation by means of Genetic Algorithms and 3D-CFD 22nd CADFEM User Meeting Dresden 2004
- Borrvall, T. Petersson, J. Topology optimization of fluids in Stokes flow Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 41 77 2003
- Moos, O. Klimetzek, F. Rossmann, R. “Bionic Optimization of Air-Guiding Systems,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1377 2004 10.4271/2004-01-1377
- Othmer, C. de Villiers, E. Weller, H.G. 2007 Implementation of a continuous adjoint for topology optimization of ducted flows AIAA-2007-3947
- Sigmund, O. Gersborg-Hansen, A. Haber, R.B. Topology optimization for multiphysics problems: A future FEMLAB application? Proc. Nordic MATLAB Conf. Gregersen, L. Comsol A/S Søborg, Denmark 237 2003
- Othmer, C. Kaminski, Th. Giering, R. Computation of topological sensitivities in fluid dynamics: Cost function versatility ECCOMAS CFD 2006 Delft 2006
- de Villiers, E. Multi-Objective Adjoint Optimization of Flows in Duct and Pipe Networks Flow Problem Analysis in Oil & Gas Industry Rotterdam, The Netherlands 2011
- Gottlieb, A. Strobel, A. Stephan, M. Anwendung der Topologieoptimierung für strömungsführende Bauteile im Fahrzeugentwicklungsprozess SIMVEC 2010 Baden-Baden VDI-Berichte 2107 569 2010
- Hinterberger, C. Olesen, M. “Automatic Geometry Optimization of Exhaust Systems Based on Sensitivities Computed by a Continuous Adjoint CFD Method in OpenFOAM,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1278 2010 10.4271/2010-01-1278
- Hinterberger, Ch. Olesen, M. Industrial Application of Continuous Adjoint Flow Solvers for the Optimization of Automotive Exhaust Systems ECCOMAS CFD&Optimization Antalya 2010
- Menter, F. R. 1994 “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications” AIAA Journal 32 8 1598 1605
- Pironneau, O. On optimum design in fluid mechanics J. Fluid Mech. 64 97 110 1974
- Othmer, C. A continuous adjoint formulation for the computation of topological and surface sensitivities of ducted flows Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 58 862 877 2008
- Zymaris, A.S. Papadimitriou, D.I. Giannakoglou, K.C. Othmer, C. Continuous Adjoint Approach to the Spalart Allmaras Turbulence Model for Incompressible Flows Computers & Fluids 38 1528 1538 2009
- Williams, J. Rossignac, J. 2004 “Tightening: Curvature-Limiting Morphological Simplification” GVU, ACM Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling (SPM)