This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Improving Speed and Accuracy of Gasoline and Diesel Engine Testing via Closed-Loop Combustion Control
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 16, 2012 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
To improve the speed and accuracy of engine testing, the spark (gasoline)/injection (diesel) timing can be optimized based on the location of the 50% mass fraction burn point (α50) rather than the traditional approach of "sweeping" timing to find the most efficient point. Results from both gasoline and diesel engines show that setting α50 to around 8° ATDC gives optimum efficiency for most circumstances. An exception is the case of highly unstable combustion, where the misfire rate may also be strongly dependent on timing. For diesel engines this method is effective in finding the timing for best efficiency but in practice the chosen injection timing may be driven more by the need to optimize emissions.
This technique has been implemented by incorporating a burn angle controller into the MAHLE Flexible ECU (MFE), a powerful and highly adaptable engine controller. The MFE includes the burn angle calculation (based on cylinder pressure signals) as well as the main control strategy in a single robust unit, allowing for straightforward test bed or vehicle operation of gasoline and diesel engines. The burn angle controller also takes account of knock and cylinder pressure limitations.
A high octane fuel demonstrator car was developed using the MFE for the remapping of spark and other parameters. Optimum spark timing was found by the burn angle controller while operating the engine at different loads and speeds on a chassis dynamometer, without needing to remove the engine from the vehicle. The remapped engine delivered 15-20% more torque at low to medium speeds than the baseline engine (at the same boost pressure), while reducing fuel requirement due to lower exhaust temperatures. This could be felt as much stronger vehicle performance and improved flexibility in high gears.
|Technical Paper||Flame Diagnostics in the Combustion Chamber of Boosted PFI SI Engine|
|Technical Paper||The Effect of EGR on the Performance and Pollutant Emissions of Heavy Duty Diesel Engines Using Constant and Variable AFR|
CitationCains, T., Pates, D., and Warth, M., "Improving Speed and Accuracy of Gasoline and Diesel Engine Testing via Closed-Loop Combustion Control," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0902, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0902.
- Brooks, T. Lumsden, G. Blaxill, H. “Improving Base Engine Calibrations for Diesel Vehicles Through the Use of DoE and Optimization Techniques,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3833 2005 10.4271/2005-01-3833
- Liebig, D. Krane, W. Ziman, P. Garbe, T. et al. “The Response of a Closed Loop Controlled Diesel Engine on Fuel Variation,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-2471 2008 10.4271/2008-01-2471
- Cooper, J “Comparison between Mapping MBT versus 50% mass fraction burn MBT” Ford Motor Co. Report November 1997
- Hillion, M. Buhlbuck, H. Chauvin, J. Petit, N. “Combustion Control of Diesel Engines Using Injection Timing,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0367 2009 10.4271/2009-01-0367
- PROtroniC from AFT Atlas Fahrzeugtechnik http://www.aft-werdohl.de/
- TargetLink from dSPACE http://www.dspace.com
- Brunt, M. Pond, C. “Evaluation of Techniques for Absolute Cylinder Pressure Correction,” SAE Technical Paper 970036 1997 10.4271/970036
- Schiefer, D. Maennel, R. Nardoni, W. “Advantages of Diesel Engine Control Using In-Cylinder Pressure Information for Closed Loop Control,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0364 2003 10.4271/2003-01-0364
- Korte, V et al. “MAHLE-Bosch Demonstrator Vehicle for Advanced Downsizing” 19. Aachener Kolloquium Fahrzeug- und Motorentechnik October 2010
- Gurney, D Genieser, P “Simulation and Optimisation of a Variable Valvetrain System for a Compression Ignition Engine” VDI conference “Ventiltrieb und Zylinderkopf” November 2010