This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Fuel Effects on Combustion and Emissions of a Direct-Injection Diesel Engine Operating at Moderate to High Engine Speed and Load
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 16, 2012 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
It is advantageous to increase the specific power output of diesel engines and to operate them at higher load for a greater portion of a driving cycle to achieve better thermal efficiency and thus reduce vehicle fuel consumption. Such operation is limited by excessive smoke formation at retarded injection timing and high rates of cylinder pressure rise at more advanced timing. Given this window of operation, it is desired to understand the influence of fuel properties such that optimum combustion performance and emissions can be retained over the range of fuels commonly available in the marketplace. Data are examined from a direct-injection single-cylinder research engine for eight common diesel fuels including soy-based biodiesel blends at two high load operating points with no exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and at a moderate load with four levels of EGR. The high load operating point that incorporates a pilot + main injection strategy shows a reduced sensitivity to fuel ignitibility compared to the high load operating point using only a single injection event. Although ignition delay varies by only 0.5 degCA between the fuels when using the single injection event, the longer ignition delay led to a substantial increase in noise at a constant combustion phasing, and was accompanied by a small increase in smoke and CO emissions. Biodiesel blends increase NOX emissions and decrease CO and smoke emissions at high load, but are otherwise within the range of performance observed for the petroleum-derived fuels. At moderate load, higher CN fuels are more tolerant to EGR due to their better chemical reactivity at retarded injection timing, but all fuels produce comparable thermal efficiency at advanced combustion phasing regardless of EGR. In contrast to the high load conditions, there was no increase in NOX emissions for biodiesel at the moderate load condition. It is concluded that a pilot + main fuel injection strategy at high load is less sensitive to fuel ignitibility differences than a single injection strategy, and that ignitibility differences can result in significant differences in engine noise for the single injection strategy and a the moderate load condition, thus influencing the acceptable injection timing range for each fuel. Apart from CN effects, fuel oxygen content plays an independent role in reducing some emissions. It is therefore recommended that compensation for fuel ignitability and oxygen content be included in combustion control strategies to optimize emissions and performance of future diesel engines.
CitationSzybist, J., Szymkowicz, P., and Northrop, W., "Fuel Effects on Combustion and Emissions of a Direct-Injection Diesel Engine Operating at Moderate to High Engine Speed and Load," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0863, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0863.
- One Hundred Tenth Congress of the United States of America, Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 2007
- Owen, K. Coley, T. “Automotive Fuels Reference Book Second Edition,” SAE International Warrendale, PA 978-1-56091-589-8 1995
- Heywood, J.B. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals 1988 New York, NY McGraw-Hill Book Company 930
- Wong, C. Steere, D. “The Effects of Diesel Fuel Properties and Engine Operating Conditions on Ignition Delay,” SAE Technical Paper 821231 1982 10.4271/821231
- Yost, D. Ryan, T. Owens, E. “Fuel Effects on Combustion in a Two-Stroke Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 852104 1985 10.4271/852104
- Kagami, M. Akasaka, Y. Date, K. Maeda, T. “The Influence of Fuel Properties on the Performance of Japanese Automotive Diesels,” SAE Technical Paper 841082 1984 10.4271/841082
- Puschmann, H. Sommer, A. Liebig, D. Harrison, A. et al. “Emission and Ignition Effects of Alternative Fuels at Conventional and Premixed Diesel Combustion,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 3 1 435 451 2010 10.4271/2010-01-0870
- Nanjundaswamy, H. Tatur, M. Tomazic, D. Koerfer, T. et al. “Fuel Property Effects on Emissions and Performance of a Light-Duty Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0488 2009 10.4271/2009-01-0488
- Stivender, D. “Development of a Fuel-Based Mass Emission Measurement Procedure,” SAE Technical Paper 710604 1971 10.4271/710604
- Northrop, W. Bohac, S. Assanis, D. “Premixed Low Temperature Combustion of Biodiesel and Blends in a High Speed Compression Ignition Engine,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2 1 28 40 2009 10.4271/2009-01-0133
- Graboski, M.S. McCormick, R.L. Combustion of Fat and Vegetable Oil Derived Fuels in Diesel Engines Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 1998 24 125 164
- Mueller, C. Boehman, A. Martin, G. “An Experimental Investigation of the Origin of Increased NOx Emissions When Fueling a Heavy-Duty Compression-Ignition Engine with Soy Biodiesel,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2 1 789 816 2009 10.4271/2009-01-1792
- Eckerle, W. Lyford-Pike, E. Stanton, D. LaPointe, L. “Effects of Methyl Ester Biodiesel Blends on NOx Emissions,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 1 1 102 118 2009 10.4271/2008-01-0078
- Zhang, L. “A Study of Pilot Injection in a DI Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-3493 1999 10.4271/1999-01-3493
- Lyn, W. Valdmanis, E. “The Effects of Physical Factors on Ignition Delay,” SAE Technical Paper 680102 1968 10.4271/680102
- Turns, S., R. An Introduction to Combustion 1996 New York, NY McGraw-Hill, Inc. 565
- He, X. et al. “An experimental and modeling study of iso-octane ignition delay times under homogeneous charge compression ignition conditions.” Combustion and Flame 2005 142 3 266 275