This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Spray Parameter Comparison between Diesel and Vegetable Oils for Non-Evaporating Conditions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 16, 2012 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The internal combustion engine with compression ignition is still the most important power plant for heavy duty transport, railway transport, marine applications and generator sets. Fuel cost and emission regulations drive manufacturers to switch to alternative fuels. The understanding and prediction of these fuels in the spray and combustion process will be very important for these issues. In the past, lot of research was done for conventional diesel fuel by optically analyzing both spray and combustion. However comparison between different groups is difficult since qualitative results and accuracies are depending in the used definitions and methods. The goal of present research is to verify the behavior pure oils compared to more standard fuels while paying lot of attention to the interpretation of the measurement results.
Spray formation from a pump-line-nozzle diesel fuel injection system through a multi-hole injector, used for medium speed applications, is studied in an optically accessible constant volume combustion chamber using digital high speed shadowgraphy. A nitrogen atmosphere up to 80bar and 150°C was used for the non-reacting injection environment. This work compares non-evaporating sprays of diesel, rapeseed methyl-ester and rapeseed oil. In the first part the acquisition and processing of the optical measurements is evaluated and discussed in detail: results might differ depending on the used techniques which makes it not straight forward comparing results from other authors. The difficulty of image interpretation as well as the high standard deviation of the obtained results is pointed out. A second part discusses the influence of the fuel on the fuel injection system. Finally, the comparison for the different fuels is made between the different spray parameters for non-evaporating sprays, such as spray angle and penetration. It was found that the higher viscosity and bulk modulus of the oil significantly increases the injection pressure, shortens the injection delay and reduces the atomization. The spray angle and penetration progress approximately stayed the same at the later stage of the injection. The spray structure however differs for the highly viscous oil, suggesting that another parameter to characterize the spray is required.
CitationGalle, J., Demuynck, J., Vancoillie, J., and Verhelst, S., "Spray Parameter Comparison between Diesel and Vegetable Oils for Non-Evaporating Conditions," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0461, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0461.
- Ajanovic, A. and Haas, R., “Economic challenges for the future relevance of biofuels in transport in EU countries,” Energy, vol. 35(2010):3340-3348
- Demirbas, A., “Competitive liquid biofuels from biomass,” Applied Energy, 88(2011): 17-28
- Berndesa, Goran, et al., “Strategies for 2nd generation biofuels in EU - Co-firing to stimulate feedstock supply development and process integration to improve energy efficiency and economic competitiveness,” Biomas & Bioenergy, 34(2010):227-236
- Krahl, J., et al., “Comparison of exhaust emissions and their mutagenicity from the combustion of biodiesel, vegetable oil, gas-to-liquid and petrodiesel fuels”, Fuel, 88(2009): 1064-1069
- Lapuerta, M., et al., “Effect of biodiesel fuels on diesel engine emissions,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 34(2008): 198-223
- Wloka, J.A., Hubert, A., Wachtmeister, G., Injection spray comparison of diesel fuel and cold pressed rapeseed oil fuel, ILASS2010
- Reitz, R. and Bracco, F., “On the Dependence of Spray Angle and Other Spray Parameters on Nozzle Design and Operating Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper 790494, 1979, doi: 10.4271/790494.
- Baert, R., Frijters, P., Somers, B., Luijten, C. et al., “Design and Operation of a High Pressure, High Temperature Cell for HD Diesel Spray Diagnostics: Guidelines and Results,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0649, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-0649.
- Naber, J. and Siebers, D., “Effects of Gas Density and Vaporization on Penetration and Dispersion of Diesel Sprays,” SAE Technical Paper 960034, 1996, doi: 10.4271/960034.
- Hattori, H., Narumiya, K., Tsue, M., and Kadota, T., “Analysis of Initial Breakup Mechanism of Diesel Spray Injected into High-Pressure Ambience,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0528, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-0528.
- Klein-Douwel, R.J.H., Frijters, P.J.M., Somers, L.M.T., de Boer, W.A., Baert, R.S.G., “Macrsocopic diesel fuel spray shadowgraphy using high speed digital imaging in a high pressure cell”, Fuel, 86(2007): 1994-2007
- Takahashi, H., Tomaru, K., Shiga, S., Karasawa, T. et al., “Characteristics of Diesel Spray with Unsteady and Higher Injection Pressure Using a Rapid Compression Machine,” SAE Technical Paper 910226, 1991, doi: 10.4271/910226.
- Mancaruso, E., Vaglieco, B.M., “Optical investigation of the combustion behaviour inside the engine operating in HCCI mode and using alternative diesel fuel”, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 34(2010):346-351
- Kozuka, K., Ozasa, T., Fujikawa, T., and Saito, A. Schlieren observation of spark ignited premixed charge combustion phenomena using a transparent collimating cylinder engine. page 8, 2003.
- Sarjovaara, T., Hillamo, H., Larmi, M., and Olenius, T., “Optical In-Cylinder Measurements of a Large-Bore Medium-Speed Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-2477, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-2477.
- Xiangyi, W., Feng, X., and Wang, L., “Experimental Study on Characteristics of Conical Spray and Combustion for Medium Speed D.I. Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 930598, 1993, doi: 10.4271/930598.
- Kim, B., Yoon, W., Ryu, S., and Ha, J., “Effect of the Injector Nozzle Hole Diameter and Number on the Spray Characteristics and the Combustion Performance in Medium-Speed Diesel Marine Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3853, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-3853.
- Settles, G.S., Schlieren & Shadowgraph Techniques. 2001: Springer.
- Siebers, D., “Scaling Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays Based on Mixing-Limited Vaporization,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0528, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-0528.
- Stiesch, G., “Modeling engine spray and combustion processes”, Springer, 2003, ISBN 3-540-00682-6
- Shiga, S. et al., ‘The Effect of Unsteadiness of Injection Pressure History on Diesel Spray Characteristics’, Trans. of Japan Soc. of Mech. Enges. Vol. 53, No.488, 1987, p 1443
- Abani, N., Reitz, R.D., “A model to predict spray-tip penetration for time-varying injection profiles”, ILASS Americas, Chicago, May 2007
- Schihl, P., Bryzik, W., and Atreya, A., “Analysis of Current Spray Penetration Models and Proposal of a Phenomenological Cone Penetration Model,” SAE Technical Paper 960773, 1996, doi: 10.4271/960773.
- Gupta, S., Poola, R., and Sekar, R., “Effect of Injection Parameters on Diesel Spray Characteristics,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1600, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-1600.
- Arrègle, J., Pastor, J., and Ruiz, S., “The Influence of Injection Parameters on Diesel Spray Characteristics,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0200, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-0200.
- Garcia, J.M., Pastor, J.V., Lopez, J.J., Pastor, J.M., “A 1D model for the description of mixing-controlled inert diesel sprays”, Fuel' 87(2008); 2871-2885