This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Techno-Economic Analysis of PEV Battery Second Use: Repurposed-Battery Selling Price and Commercial and Industrial End-User Value
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 16, 2012 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Accelerated market penetration of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) is presently restricted by the high cost of batteries. Deployment of grid-connected energy storage, which could increase the reliability, efficiency, and cleanliness of the grid, is similarly inhibited by the cost of batteries. Research, development, and manufacturing are underway to reduce cost by lowering material costs, enhance process efficiencies, and increase production volumes. Another approach under consideration is to recover a fraction of the battery cost after the battery has been retired from vehicular service via reuse in other applications, where it may still have sufficient performance to meet the requirements of other energy-storage applications. By extracting additional services and revenue from the battery in a post-vehicle application, the total lifetime value of the battery is increased, thereby decreasing the overall cost of energy-storage solutions for both primary (automotive) and secondary (grid) customers. In this paper, a techno-economic analysis of second use is described, taking into consideration the effects of battery degradation in both automotive and grid service, repurposing costs, balance-of-systems costs, the value of aggregated energy-storage to commercial and industrial end users, and competitive technology. It is shown that under our chosen assumptions the batteries from PEVs can economically be used to serve the power quality and reliability needs of commercial and industrial end users (e.g., with system payback periods ranging from 7 to 10 years). However, the value to the automotive battery owner is small (e.g., $20-$100/kWh), as declining future battery costs and other factors are expected to strongly affect the selling price. We forecast repurposed automotive battery prices to range from approximately $38/kWh to $132/kWh.
CitationNeubauer, J., Pesaran, A., Williams, B., Ferry, M. et al., "A Techno-Economic Analysis of PEV Battery Second Use: Repurposed-Battery Selling Price and Commercial and Industrial End-User Value," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0349, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0349.
- Cready, E.; Lippert, J.; Pihl, J.; Weinstock, I.; Symons, P.; Jungst, R. G. Technical and Economic Feasibility of Applying Used EV Batteries in Stationary Applications: A Study for the DOE Energy Storage Systems Program; SAND2002-4084; Sandia National Laboratories: Albuquerque, NM, March, 2002.
- Williams, B. D.; Lipman, T. E. Strategies for Transportation Electric Fuel Implementation in California: Overcoming Battery First-Cost Hurdles; CEC-500-2009-091; California Energy Commission Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Transportation Program: Sacramento, 2009. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2009publications/CEC-500-2009-091/CEC-500-2009-091.PDF
- Beer, S.; Gómez, T.; Dallinger, D.; Momber, I.; Marnay, C.; Stadler, M.; Lai, J. An economic analysis of used electric vehicle batteries integrated into commercial building microgrids; Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research: October, 2011. http://www.mendeley.com/research/economic-analysis-used-electric-vehicle-batteries-integrated-commercial-building-microgrids/
- Neubauer, J.; Pesaran, A. “The ability of battery second use strategies to impact plug-in electric vehicle prices and serve utility energy storage applications.” Journal of Power Sources 2011, 196, (23), 10351-10358. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378775311012377
- Williams, B. D.; Lipman, T. E. Analysis of the Combined Vehicle- and Post-Vehicle-Use Value of Lithium-Ion Plug-In-Vehicle Propulsion Batteries; report number TBD (in press); California Energy Commission: Sacramento CA, 2011.
- Smith, K.; Markel, T.; Kim, G.-H.; Pesaran, A., Design of Electric Drive Vehicle Batteries for Long Life and Low Cost. In IEEE Accelerated Stress Testing and Reliability Workshop, Denver, CO, 2010.
- ESRL, “Average Mean Temperature Index by month.” http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/usclimate/tmp.state.19712000.climo
- Traffic Choices Study - Summary Report; Puget Sound Regional Council: April, 2008. http://psrc.org/assets/37/summaryreport.pdf
- Dinger, A.; Martin, R.; Mosquet, X.; Rabi, M.; Rizoulis, D.; Russo, M.; Sticher, G. Batteries for Electric Cars: Challenges, Opportunities, and the Outlook to 2020; Boston Consulting Group: 2010. http://www.bcg.com/documents/file36615.pdf
- Hensley, R.; Knupfer, S.; Pinner, D. Electrifying cars: How three industries will evolve; McKinsey & Company: 2009.
- Lache, R.; Galves, D.; Nolan, P. Vehicle Electrification: More rapid growth; steeper price declines for batteries; Deutsche Bank: 2010.
- Howell, D., “Annual Merit Review: Energy Storage R&D and ARRA Overview.” 2010. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/pdfs/merit_review_2010/electrochemical_storage/es00a_howell_2010_o.pdf
- AUTONOMIE Cost Model; Ricardo, U.S. Department of Energy: 24 Nov, 2010. http://www.autonomie.net
- O'Keefe, M.; Brooker, A.; Johnson, C.; Mendelsohn, M.; Neubauer, J.; Pesaran, A. In Battery Ownership Model: A Tool for Evaluating the Economics of Electrified Vehicles and Related Infrastructure, 25th International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium & Exposition, Shenzhen, China, 5 - 9 November, 2010; Shenzhen, China, 2010. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/49127.pdf
- “National and State Corporate Income Tax Rates, U.S. States and OECD Countries, 2011.” The Tax Foundation. 2011. http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/23034.html
- Narula, C. K.; Martinez, R.; Onar, O.; Starke, M. R.; Andrews, G. Economic Analysis of Deploying Used Batteries in Power Systems; Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Oak Ridge, TN, 2011.
- Electricity Energy Storage Technology Options: A White Paper Primer on Applications, Costs and Benefits; 1020676; Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI): Palo Alto, CA, Dec, 2010.
- Eyer, J.; Corey, G. Energy Storage for the Electricity Grid: Benefits and Market Potential Assessment Guide; SAND2010-0815; Sandia National Laboratories: Feb, 2010. http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2010/100815.pdf
- “Schedule TOU-GS-3-SOP Time-of-Use - General Service - Super Off-Peak - Demand Metered.” Southern California Edison. http://www.sce.com/NR/sc3/tm2/pdf/ce282.pdf