This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Techno-Economic Analysis of PEV Battery Second Use: Repurposed-Battery Selling Price and Commercial and Industrial End-User Value
Technical Paper
2012-01-0349
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Accelerated market penetration of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) is presently restricted by the high cost of batteries. Deployment of grid-connected energy storage, which could increase the reliability, efficiency, and cleanliness of the grid, is similarly inhibited by the cost of batteries. Research, development, and manufacturing are underway to reduce cost by lowering material costs, enhance process efficiencies, and increase production volumes. Another approach under consideration is to recover a fraction of the battery cost after the battery has been retired from vehicular service via reuse in other applications, where it may still have sufficient performance to meet the requirements of other energy-storage applications. By extracting additional services and revenue from the battery in a post-vehicle application, the total lifetime value of the battery is increased, thereby decreasing the overall cost of energy-storage solutions for both primary (automotive) and secondary (grid) customers. In this paper, a techno-economic analysis of second use is described, taking into consideration the effects of battery degradation in both automotive and grid service, repurposing costs, balance-of-systems costs, the value of aggregated energy-storage to commercial and industrial end users, and competitive technology. It is shown that under our chosen assumptions the batteries from PEVs can economically be used to serve the power quality and reliability needs of commercial and industrial end users (e.g., with system payback periods ranging from 7 to 10 years). However, the value to the automotive battery owner is small (e.g., $20-$100/kWh), as declining future battery costs and other factors are expected to strongly affect the selling price. We forecast repurposed automotive battery prices to range from approximately $38/kWh to $132/kWh.
Recommended Content
| Magazine Issue | SAE Vehicle Electrification 2012-02-21 |
Authors
Topic
Citation
Neubauer, J., Pesaran, A., Williams, B., Ferry, M. et al., "A Techno-Economic Analysis of PEV Battery Second Use: Repurposed-Battery Selling Price and Commercial and Industrial End-User Value," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0349, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0349.Also In
References
- Cready, E. Lippert, J. Pihl, J. Weinstock, I. Symons, P. Jungst, R. G. Technical and Economic Feasibility of Applying Used EV Batteries in Stationary Applications: A Study for the DOE Energy Storage Systems Program ; SAND2002-4084 Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM March 2002
- Williams, B. D. Lipman, T. E. Strategies for Transportation Electric Fuel Implementation in California: Overcoming Battery First-Cost Hurdles California Energy Commission Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Transportation Program Sacramento 2009 http://www.energy.ca.gov/2009publications/CEC-500-2009-091/CEC-500-2009-091.PDF
- Beer, S. Gómez, T. Dallinger, D. Momber, I. Marnay, C. Stadler, M. Lai, J. An economic analysis of used electric vehicle batteries integrated into commercial building microgrids Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research October 2011 http://www.mendeley.com/research/economic-analysis-used-electric-vehicle-batteries-integrated-commercial-building-microgrids/
- Neubauer, J. Pesaran, A. “The ability of battery second use strategies to impact plug-in electric vehicle prices and serve utility energy storage applications.” Journal of Power Sources 2011 196 23 10351 10358 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378775311012377
- Williams, B. D. Lipman, T. E. Analysis of the Combined Vehicle- and Post-Vehicle-Use Value of Lithium-Ion Plug-In-Vehicle Propulsion Batteries ; report number TBD California Energy Commission Sacramento CA 2011
- Smith, K. Markel, T. Kim, G.-H. Pesaran, A. Design of Electric Drive Vehicle Batteries for Long Life and Low Cost IEEE Accelerated Stress Testing and Reliability Workshop Denver, CO 2010
- ESRL “Average Mean Temperature Index by month.” http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/usclimate/tmp.state.19712000.climo
- Traffic Choices Study - Summary Report Puget Sound Regional Council April 2008 http://psrc.org/assets/37/summaryreport.pdf
- Dinger, A. Martin, R. Mosquet, X. Rabi, M. Rizoulis, D. Russo, M. Sticher, G. Batteries for Electric Cars: Challenges, Opportunities, and the Outlook to 2020 Boston Consulting Group 2010 http://www.bcg.com/documents/file36615.pdf
- Hensley, R. Knupfer, S. Pinner, D. Electrifying cars: How three industries will evolve McKinsey & Company 2009
- Lache, R. Galves, D. Nolan, P. Vehicle Electrification: More rapid growth; steeper price declines for batteries Deutsche Bank 2010
- Howell, D. “Annual Merit Review: Energy Storage R&D and ARRA Overview.” 2010 http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/pdfs/merit_review_2010/electrochemical_storage/es00a_howell_2010_o.pdf
- AUTONOMIE Cost Model Ricardo, U.S. Department of Energy 24 Nov 2010 http://www.autonomie.net
- O'Keefe, M. Brooker, A. Johnson, C. Mendelsohn, M. Neubauer, J. Pesaran, A. Battery Ownership Model: A Tool for Evaluating the Economics of Electrified Vehicles and Related Infrastructure 25th International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium & Exposition Shenzhen, China 5 9 November 2010 Shenzhen, China 2010 http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/49127.pdf
- “National and State Corporate Income Tax Rates, U.S. States and OECD Countries, 2011.” The Tax Foundation 2011 http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/23034.html
- Narula, C. K. Martinez, R. Onar, O. Starke, M. R. Andrews, G. Economic Analysis of Deploying Used Batteries in Power Systems Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 2011
- Electricity Energy Storage Technology Options: A White Paper Primer on Applications, Costs and Benefits Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Palo Alto, CA Dec 2010
- Eyer, J. Corey, G. Energy Storage for the Electricity Grid: Benefits and Market Potential Assessment Guide Sandia National Laboratories Feb 2010 http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2010/100815.pdf
- “Schedule TOU-GS-3-SOP Time-of-Use - General Service - Super Off-Peak - Demand Metered.” Southern California Edison http://www.sce.com/NR/sc3/tm2/pdf/ce282.pdf