Try Mobilus Beta
Search tips
 This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Schedule Design to Guarantee Freedom of Interference in Mixed Criticality Systems

Journal Article
2012-01-0036
ISSN: 1946-4614, e-ISSN: 1946-4622
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0036
Published April 16, 2012 by SAE International in United States
Schedule Design to Guarantee Freedom of Interference in Mixed Criticality Systems
Sector:
Citation: Ficek, C., Richter, K., and Feiertag, N., "Schedule Design to Guarantee Freedom of Interference in Mixed Criticality Systems," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Electron. Electr. Syst. 5(1):46-54, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0036.
Language: English

References

  1. OSEK/VDX Group Operating System Specification 2.2.3 OSEK/VDX Group Feb. 2005 http://www.osek-vdx.org/
  2. www.autosar.org Official website of the AUTOSAR partnership
  3. Liu, C. L. Layland, J. W. “Scheduling algorithms for multiprogramming in a hard-real-time environment” Journal of the ACM 20 1 46 61 1973
  4. Sha, L. Rajkumar, R. Sathaye, S.S. “Generalized rate-monotonic scheduling theory: a framework for developing real-time systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE 82 1 68 82 Jan 1994
  5. De Niz, D. Lakshmanan, K. Rajkumar, R. “On the Scheduling of Mixed-Criticality Real-Time Task Sets” Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2009, RTSS 2009. 30th IEEE 291 300 1 4 Dec. 2009
  6. Lakshmanan, K. de Niz, D. Rajkumar, R. “Mixed-Criticality Task Synchronization in Zero-Slack Scheduling” Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS), 2011 17th IEEE 47 56 11 14 April 2011
  7. Vestal, Steve “Preemptive Scheduling of Multi-criticality Systems with Varying Degrees of Execution Time Assurance” Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS ′07) 2007
  8. Sha, L. Lehoczky, J. P. Rajkumar, R. “Solutions for Some Practical Problems in Prioritized Preemptive Scheduling,” IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium 1986
  9. ISO 26262 Road vehicles 2011 Functional safety - Part 1-10, Standard under development http://www.iso.org
  10. Henia, R. Hamann, A. Jersak, M. Racu, R. Richter, K. Ernst, R. “System level performance analysis - the symta/s approach” IEEE Proceedings Computers and Digital Techniques 2005
  11. Palencia, J. Harbour, M. G. “Schedulability analysis for tasks with static and dynamic offsets” Real-Time Systems Symposium, 1998. Proceedings., The 19th IEEE 26 37 IEEE 1998
  12. Bertrand, Dominique Faucou, Sébastien Trinquet, Yvon “An analysis of the AUTOSAR OS timing protection mechanism” Proceedings of the 14th IEEE international conference on Emerging technologies /& factory automation (ETFA'09) IEEE Press Piscataway, NJ, USA 2009
  13. Ficek, C Feiertag, N. Richter, K. Jersak, M. “Applying the AUTOSAR timing protection to build safe and efficient ISO 26262 mixed-criticality systems” Embedded Real-Time Soft-ware Congress (ERTS) Toulouse, France January 2012
  14. Racu, R. Jersak, M. Ernst, R. “Applying Sensitivity Analysis in Real-Time Distributed Systems” Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Real Time on Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS ′05) IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC 2005
  15. Goossens, J. “Scheduling of offset free systems” Real-Time Systems 24 2 239 258 March 2003
  16. Grenier, M. Goossens, J. Navet, N. “Near-optimal fixed priority preemptive scheduling of offset free systems” Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Network and Systems (RTNS′2006) Poitiers, France May 30 31 2006
  17. SymTA/S by Symtavision GmbH www.symtavision.com

Cited By

Recommended Content

Technical Paper Software Architecture Methods and Mechanisms for Timing Error and Failure Detection According to ISO 26262: Deadline vs. Execution Time Monitoring
Technical Paper Methods and Tools for End-to-End Latency Analysis and Optimization of a Dual-Processor Control Module
Technical Paper 10 Steps to ISO26262-compliant Model-based Software Components