This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Cross-Section Design of the Crash Box to Maximize Energy Absorption
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 06, 2011 by The Automotive Research Association of India in India
Annotation ability available
Vehicle collisions frequently happen at a low-speed. Insurance companies and the RCAR (Research Council for Automobile Repairs) require reducing repair costs and improving occupant safety in a low-speed crash. In order to reduce repair costs in the RCAR test conditions, an energy absorbing device such as the crash box (C/Box) is usually installed. The C/Box is a thin-walled structure attached between the vehicle bumper structure and the side rail. The determination of the C/Box geometry is quite important to absorb the impact energy since the installation space of the C/Box is not very large. In this research, the determination process for the cross-sectional dimensions is proposed to improve the energy absorption efficiency of the C/Box. The proposed process has two steps. First, the cross-sectional dimensions are determined by two ways. One is a parameter study using an orthogonal array and the other is topology optimization. The cross-sectional dimensions of the C/Box are selected among the available cross-sections, such as a circle and polygon. The cross-sectional dimensions are determined by the analysis of mean (ANOM) from the orthogonal array. And topology optimization is performed to determine the cross-section of the C/Box to maximize the absorbed strain energy based on the RCAR test conditions. The equivalent Static Loads method for non linear static response Structural Optimization (ESLSO) is employed to solve the formulated topology optimization problems. Second, the detailed design processes are performed by using an orthogonal array for the three models that are selected in the first step. The optimization problem for the C/Box is formulated considering the geometric constraints to fit into the given space for the C/Box. Through the proposed process, three new types of C/Box are suggested with the detailed shapes.
CitationJang, H., Lee, H., Yi, S., Kim, D. et al., "Cross-Section Design of the Crash Box to Maximize Energy Absorption," SAE Technical Paper 2011-28-0110, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-28-0110.
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, Code of Federal Regulations under Title 49, Part 571
- European New Car Assessment Program (EuroNCAP) http://www.euroncap.com/home.aspx
- European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee (EEVC) http://www.eevc.org/
- Research Council for Automobile Repair (RCAR) http://www.rcar.org/index.htm
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) http://www.iihs.org/
- Fang, H. Rais-Rohani, M. Liu, Z. Horstemeyer, M.F. 2005 “A Comparative Study of Metamodeling Methods for Multiobjective Crashworthiness Optimization,” Computers and Structures 83 25-26 2121 2135
- Craig, K.J. Stander, N. Dooge, D.A. Varadappa, S. 1995 “Automotive Crashworthiness Design Using Response Surface Based Variable Screening and Optimization,” Engineering Computations 22 1 38 61
- Forsberg, J. Nilsson, L. 1996 “Evaluation of Response Surface Methodologies used in Crashworthiness Optimization,” International Journal of Impact Engineering 32 5 759 777
- Liao, X. Ki, Q. Yang, X. Zhang, W. Li, W. 2007 “Multiobjective Optimization for Crash Safety Design of Vehicles Using Stepwise Regression Model,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 35 6 561 569
- Mayer, R.R. Kikuchi, N. Scott, R.A. 1996 “Applications of Topology Optimization Techniques to Structural Crashworthiness,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 39 1383 1403
- Forsberg, J. Nilsson, L. 2007 “Topology Optimization in Crashworthiness Design,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 33 1 1 12
- Patel, N.M. Kang, B.S. Renaud, J.E. Tovar, A. 2009 “Crashworthiness Design Using Topology Optimization,” Journal of Mechanical Design 131 6 061013 1 12
- Pedersen, C.B.W. 2003 “Topology Optimization for Crashworthiness of Frame Structures,” International Journal of Crashworthiness 8 1 29 39
- Park, G.J. Analytic Methods for Design Practice Springer Berlin 2007
- Choi, W.S. Park, G.J. “Structural Optimization Using Equivalent Static Loads at All the Time Intervals,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 191 19-20 2105 2122
- Park, G.J. Kang, B.S. 2003 “Validation of a Structural Optimization Algorithm Transforming Dynamic Loads into Equivalent Static Loads,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 118 1 191 200 2003
- Kang, B.S. Park, G.J. Arora, J.S. 2005 “Optimization of Flexible Multibody Dynamic System Using the Equivalent Static Loads,” AIAA Journal 43 4 846 852
- Shin, M.K. Park, K.J. Park, G.J. 2007 “Optimization of Structures with Nonlinear Behavior Using Equivalent Loads,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 196 4-6,1 1154 1167
- Kim, Y.I. Park, G.J. 2010 “Nonlinear Dynamic Response Structural Optimization Using Equivalent Static Loads,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 199 9-12 660 676
- Yi, S.I. Park, G.J. 2011 “Crashworthiness Design Optimization Using Equivalent Static Loads,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering
- Park, G.J. 2011 “Technical Overview of the Equivalent Static Loads Method for Non-Linear Static Response Structural Optimization,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 43 3 319 337
- Jang, H.H. Lee, H.A. Park, G.J. “Preliminary Study on Linear Dynamic Response Topology Optimization Using Equivalent Static Loads,” Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers 33 12 1357 1493
- Jang, H.H. Lee, H.A. Park, G.J. 2011 “Dynamic Response Topology Optimization in the Time Domain Using Equivalent Static Loads,” AIAA Journal
- Lee, H.A. Park, G.J. 2011 “Topology Optimization for Structures with Nonlinear Behavior Using the Equivalent Static Loads Method,” Journal of Mechanical Design
- Oh, S.H. Hyundai Motors “Crash Box Application Structure for Low-speed Crash and Walker Protection,” Filed No. 10-2001-0050430, Patent No. 10-0456940 Nov. 3 2004 Republic of Korea
- Salomonsson, P. Gestamp Hardtech AB “A Crash Box for a Vehicle,” Filed No. PCT/SE2007/000025 Jan. 15 2007 PCT
- Gunther Heim, M. Stephan Schutt, R. Jurgen Hock, A. Ymos Aktiengesellschaft Industrieproduckte “Collision Damper for Motor Vehicles,” Filed No. 685872, Patent No. 5772267 Jun. 30 1998 USA
- Lee, J.W. Hyundai Motors “Crash-Box of Automobile,” Filed No. 10-2006-0016773, Patent No. 10-0727713 Jun. 5 2007 Republic of Korea
- LS-DYNA User's Manual 2006 Livemore Software Technology Co. Livemore, CA, U.S.A.
- Reymond, Michael MD NASTRAN 2006 DMAP Programmer's Guide MSC. Software Co. Santa Ana, CA, U.S.A.
- MD NASTRAN R3 User's Manual 2008 MSC. Software Co. Santa Ana, CA, U.S.A.
- Stroustrup, B. 2000 The C++ Programming Language Addison Wesley U.S.A.
- Park, G.J. Analytic Methods for Design Practice Springer Berlin 2007