This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
High Performance CFD Computations for Ground Vehicle Aerodynamics
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published January 19, 2011 by The Automotive Research Association of India in India
Annotation ability available
Event: SIAT 2011
In this paper, benefits of high performance CFD computations for ground vehicle aerodynamics are discussed with the examples of Ahmed body and Formula SAE external aerodynamics. Both problems are highly compute intensive in terms of physics and their grid resolutions. Grid resolution is usually kept high to resolve flow separation, wake kind of complex physical phenomenon. For this, computations have been performed for more than 20 million cells grid. Firstly, Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS)-based turbulence study of Ahmed model is done for three slant angle variations, 25°, 30°, and 35°. Sensitivity of solver on solution is analyzed by a grid refinement study. The 2 million and 22 million cells mesh are used for the detailing of solution accuracies and solver speed up. Commercial solver, CFD++, and open source solver, OpenFOAM, are used for RANS computations. Their speed up test is done on supercomputer Eka. Grid refinement study shows moderate sensitivity of grid towards turbulence model, i.e., Realizable k-epsilon. A dense grid produces closer drag numbers towards experimental values. Drag coefficients, CD, obtained from two solvers, are in good agreement with the experimental data except for the configuration with slant angle 30°, which was reported earlier in the literature as a hard case to predict numerically. Also in contrast of attached flow observed in experiment for 25°, separation and reattachment is observed in simulations. This is validated well with other numerical studies. Speed up study is performed for 2 million and 22 million grids for two solvers on massively parallel supercomputer, Eka, using maximum 1024 CPUs. Scalability of the two solvers is compared for two grids and also for two solvers. Speed up and efficiency wise OpenFOAM seems better choice over CFD++ but it lacks a better time per iteration when compared to CFD++. OpenFOAM exhibits super-linearity with 300% efficiency up till 256 CPUs, while CFD++ is less than 90% efficient when CPUs exceeds 128 for coarse grid. Furthermore, another high end CFD computation has been used to analyze the flow behavior over generic Formula SAE car. CFD++, Fluent and OpenFOAM are used with RANS for baseline and modified configuration. A comparable prediction, with very dense grid for overall drag, is done for baseline shape, and drag numbers are reduced by 31% in modified shape. In the absence of any test data for race car model, the results are compared among CFD++, Fluent and OpenFOAM. A good agreement is found in obtained drag values. Overall CFD cycle time for these computations have significantly been reduced while using Parallel computations.
CitationSingh, A., Kumar, S., and Nikam, K., "High Performance CFD Computations for Ground Vehicle Aerodynamics," SAE Technical Paper 2011-26-0107, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-26-0107.
- Ahmed, S R, Ramm, G, and Faltin, G, “Some Salient Features of the Time Averaged Ground Vehicle Wake”, SAE Paper No. 840300, 1984
- Lienhart, H, Stoots, C, and Becker, S, “Flow and Turbulence Structures in the Wake of a Simplified Car Model (Ahmed Model)”, In DGLR Fach Symp. der AGSTAB, 2000
- Gillieron, P and Chometon, F, “Modelling of Stationary Three-Dimensional Separated Air Flows Around an Ahmed Reference Model”, In ESAIM proc., volume 7, pages 173-182, 1999
- Kapadia, S, Roy, S, and Wurtzler, K, “Detached Eddy Simulation Over a Reference Ahmed Car Model”, AIAA Paper No. 2003-0857, 2003
- Hinterberger, M, Garcia-Villalba, M, and Rodi, W, “Large Eddy Simulation of Flow Around the Ahmed Body”, Lecture notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics, The Aerodynamics of heavy vehicles: Trucks, Buses, and Trains, McCallen, R, Browand, F., Ross, J. (Springer, New York, 2004), 2004
- Liu, Yunlong and Moser, Alfred, “Numerical modeling of Airflow Over Ahmed Body”, Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada, V2, P507-512, 2003
- Guilmineau, E, “Computational Study of Flow Around a Simplified Car Body”, J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96, 1207, 2007
- Minguez, M, Pasquetti, R, and Serre, E, “High Order Large Eddy Simulation of Flow Over Ahmed Body Car Model”, Physics of Fluids 20, 095101 (2008), 2008
- Howard, R J A, and Pourquie, M, “Large Eddy Simulation of an Ahmed Reference Model”, Journal of Turbulence, 3 (2002) 012, 2002
- CFD++ User Manual, “Metacomputech”, (www.metacomptech.com)
- Fluent User Manual (www.ansys.com)
- OpenFOAM user manual (www.openfoam.com)
- Jasak, H, “Error Analysis and Estimation for the Finite Volume Method with Applications to Fluid Flows”, PhD thesis. Imperical College of Science, Technology and Medicine, UK, 1996
- Shih, T H, Zhu, J and Lumley, J, “A Realizable Algebraic Stress Model”, Symp. on Turbulent Shear Flow, Kyoto (Japan), Paper 3.5, 1993