This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
In-Flight Icing of UAVs - The Influence of Reynolds Number on the Ice Accretion Process
Technical Paper
2011-01-2572
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The intensive deployment of UAVs for surveillance and reconnaissance missions during the last couple of decades has revealed their vulnerability to icing conditions. At present, a common icing avoidance strategy is simply not to fly when icing is forecast. Consequently, UAV missions in cold seasons and cold regions can be delayed for days when icing conditions persist. While this approach limits substantially the failure of UAV missions as a result of icing, there is obviously a need to develop all-weather capabilities. A key step in accomplishing this objective is to understand better the influence of a smaller geometry and a lower speed on the ice accretion process, relative to the extensively researched area of in-flight icing for traditional aircraft configurations characterized by high Reynolds number.
Our analysis of the influence of Reynolds number on the ice accretion process is performed for the NACA0012 airfoil. Analytical analysis of the integrated mass and energy balance equations along the airfoil surface allows the identification of regimes of rime and glaze formation, as well as the ice accretion extent as a function of static air temperature and liquid water content. For each Reynolds number, a CFD solver computes the airflow field, and the distributions of Stanton number and static air pressure along the airfoil surface. Next, a drop trajectory solver computes the distribution of collection efficiency along the airfoil for a given drop size. Finally, a morphogenetic model is used to predict the ice accretion shape and its extent over the entire Reynolds number range under consideration. Our analysis highlights the differences between ice accretions on components of traditional aircraft and UAVs, arising from their differences in cruising speed and airfoil dimensions.
Recommended Content
| Technical Paper | Iced-Airfoil and Wing Aerodynamics |
| Technical Paper | US Army UH-60M Helicopter Main Rotor Ice Protection System |
| Technical Paper | Observations of Ice Ridge Formation on the SJ30-2 Leading Edge Slat In Freezing Drizzle Conditions |
Authors
Citation
Szilder, K. and McIlwain, S., "In-Flight Icing of UAVs - The Influence of Reynolds Number on the Ice Accretion Process," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2572, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-2572.Also In
References
- Jameson, A. “Non-oscillatory shock capturing scheme using flux limited dissipation,” Engquist, B. E. Osher, S. Sommerville, R. C. J. Lectures in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 22, Part 1: Large Scale Computations in Fluid Mechanics 345 370 AMS 1985
- Koenig, G. G. Ryerson, C. C. Kmiec, R. “UAV icing flight simulation,” 40 th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, AIAA-2002-0812
- Kroll, N. Rossow, C. C. Schwamborn, D. Becker, K. Heller, G. “MEGAFLOW - A numerical flow simulation tool for transport aircraft design,” ICAS Congress Toronto, Canada 2002
- NATO RTO Technical Report 38 “ Ice accretion simulation evaluation test ,” Kind, R. J. 2001
- Siquig, R. A. “Impact of icing on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operations,” Naval Environmental Prediction Research Facility report, PR 90:015:442 7 1990
- Szilder, K. Lozowski, E. P. “Novel two-dimensional modeling of aircraft icing,” Journal of Aircraft 41 1 854 861 2004
- Szilder, K. Lozowski, E. P. “Simulation of airfoil icing with a novel morphogenetic model,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 18 2 102 110 2005
- Tran, P. Baruzzi, G. Tremblay, F. Benquet, P. Habashi, W.G. Petersen, P. B. Liggett, M. W. Fiorucci, S. “FENSAP-ICE applications to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV),” 42 nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhi bit, AIAA-2004-0402
- Wilcox, D. C. “Re-assessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models,” AIAA Journal 26 11 1299 1310 1988
- Wright, W. B. “Users manual for the improved NASA Lewis ice accretion code LEWICE 1.6,” NASA Contractor Report 198355 1995