This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Investigation about Predictive Accuracy of Empirical Engine Models using Design of Experiments
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published August 30, 2011 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
This study focuses on improvement of the predictive accuracy of empirical engine models using the Model Base Calibration (MBC) method. This research discusses the effects of the number of measurement points on the accuracy of models for different Design of Experiments (DoE) by using a direct-injection 4-cylinder diesel engine. The results show that the predictive accuracy of the models converges on fixed values when the number of measurement points is increased in Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) and D-Optimal Design. This is because the probability density distribution of the measurement data has little variation as the number of measurement points increases. Comparing LHS and D-Optimal indicates that D-Optimal displays a higher level of accuracy, it is able to extend the boundary model because of its greater number of measurement points at the boundaries of the boundary model. In addition, it is possible to predict the fuel consumption when empirical engine models are used in simulations of the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) under hot conditions and cold start conditions.
CitationKitamura, Y., Sekikawa, A., Tokoro, M., Tomatsu, N. et al., "Investigation about Predictive Accuracy of Empirical Engine Models using Design of Experiments," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1848, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-1848.
- Castagna, E. Biondo, M. Cottrell, J. Altenstrasser, H. Beidl, C. Koegeler, H. Schuch, N. Multiple Tier 3 Engine Applications Based on Global Modelling MTZ 68 2007
- Ryu, I. Han, D. Han, SeungKook H. Hwang, I. Kim, W. Optimization of Catalyst Light-Off Time & raw THC during Cold Start in Turbo DISI Engine Using DoE Method DoE Conference in Engine Development 2007 133 144 2007
- Stuhler, H. Kruse, T. Stuber, A. Gschweitl, K. Piock, W. Pfluegl, H. Lick, P. Automated Model-Based GDI Engine Calibration Adaptive Online DoE Approach SAE Paper No. 2002-01-0708 2002
- Aono, T. Fukuchi, E. Misfire detection method robust against crankshaft vibration and acceleration Proc. 2005 IEEE Conf. on Control Applications 1218 1221 2005
- Matsui, R. Shimoyama, K. Nonaka, S. Chiba, I. Hidaka, S. Development of High-performance Diesel Engine Compliant with Euro-V SAE Paper No. 2008-01-1198 2008
- Fukano, I. Linke, M. Schindler, W. Singer, W. Haisch, C. Niessner, R. A New Device for Transient Measurement of Ultralow Soot Emissions Trans. of JSAE 36 6 121 126 2005
- Seabrook, J. He, Y. Battiston, P. He, X. Application of DoE to the Optimization of Engines with Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) Systems DoE Conference in Engine Development 2009 194 206 2009
- Mckay, D. Beckman, J. Conover, J. A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code Technometrics 21 2 239 245 1979
- Atkinson, C. Donev, N. Optimal Experimental Designs Oxford Science Publications First 1992
- The MathWorks, Inc. “Model-Based Calibration Toolbox - Calibrate Complex Powertrain Systems” http://www.mathworks.com/products/mbc/ 2009
- Ziegler, G. Hohenberg, G. Techn, B. Christ, C. 25 years dynamic engine test bed 3rd International Symposium on Development Methodology 290 313 2009
- Nebel, M. Vogels, M. Combé, T. Winsel, T. Pfluegl, H. Hametner, C. Global Dynamic Models for XiL-based Calibration SAE Paper No. 2010-01-0329 2010
- Sakushima, N. Baumann, W. Röpke, K. Knaak, M. Transient Modeling of Diesel Engine Emissions JSAE Annual Proceedings (Spring), No.87-10 17 22 2010