This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Real-Time Combustion Phase Optimization of a PFI Gasoline Engine
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 12, 2011 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Combustion control is assuming a crucial role in reducing engine tailpipe emissions and maximizing performance. The number of actuations influencing the combustion is increasing, and, as a consequence, the control parameters calibrations is becoming challenging.
One of the most effective factors influencing performance and efficiency is the combustion phasing: gasoline engines Electronic Control Units (ECU) manage the Spark Advance (SA) in order to set the optimal combustion phase. SA optimal values are usually determined by means of calibration procedures carried out on the test bench by changing SA values while monitoring Brake and Indicated Mean Effective Pressure (BMEP, IMEP), Brake Specific Fuel Consumption (BSFC) and pollutant emissions. The effect of SA on combustion is stochastic, due to the cycle-to-cycle variation: the analysis of mean values requires many engine cycles to be significant of the performance obtained with the given control setting. Usually, the optimization process is carried out off-line, based on the data sampled on the test-bench.
This paper presents the application of a new calibration concept, with the objective of improving the robustness of performance analysis, while reducing the test time. The approach is applied to a simple calibration problem, where a single input factor (SA) is tuned taking into account two issues: IMEP maximization and knock limitation. The paper shows how the methodology can be extended to multiple objective and multi-input optimization problems.
The methodology is based on the observation that, due to cycle-to-cycle variation, the combustion phasing, represented by the 50% Mass Fraction Burned (MFB50) parameter, changes continuously, even with a fixed SA. The IMEP changes accordingly, forming a typical parabola distribution in the plane IMEP-MFB50. The optimization could then be carried out by choosing SA values maintaining the scatter around the vertex. Unfortunately the distribution shape is slightly influenced by heat losses (i.e., by SA): this effect must be taken into account in order to avoid over-advanced calibrations.
The synthesis of this core-concept allows giving a contribution to a cost function, used to drive SA variations; another contribution comes from the knock intensity level. The final objective is to minimize the cost function absolute value, leading to the maximum IMEP achievable with tolerable knock intensity. The optimization process is carried out with an original approach: the cost function is by all means the error input of a PID (Proportional Integer Derivative) controller that, by definition, is intended to reduce the error, i.e., the cost function, thus performing the optimization.
The methodology has been developed and tested off-line using data referring to three different PFI gasoline engines, then it has been implemented in Real-Time. The combustion control system used for the implementation performs a cycle-to-cycle combustion analysis, evaluating the combustion parameters necessary to calculate the target SA; the target SA is then actuated by the ECU. The approach proved to be efficient, reducing the number of engine cycles necessary for the calibration to less than 1000 per operating condition.
|Technical Paper||Life of Fuel in Engine Cylinder|
|Technical Paper||A Variable-Geometry Turbocharger Control System for High Output Diesel Engines|
|Technical Paper||Diesel Powertrain Simulation for Control System Design|
CitationCorti, E. and Forte, C., "Real-Time Combustion Phase Optimization of a PFI Gasoline Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1415, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-1415.
- Ponti, F. Ravaglioli, V. Serra, G. Stola, F. “Instantaneous Engine Speed Measurement and Processing for MFB50 Evaluation,” SAE Int. J. Engines 2 2 235 244 2010 10.4271/2009-01-2747
- Hamedović, H. Raichle, F. Breuninger, J. Fischer, W. et al. “IMEP-Estimation and In-Cylinder Pressure Reconstruction for Multicylinder SI-Engine by Combined Processing of Engine Speed and One Cylinder Pressure,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0053 2005 10.4271/2005-01-0053
- Guillemin, F. Grondin, O. Chauvin, J. Nguyen, E. “Combustion Parameters Estimation Based on Knock Sensor for Control Purpose Using Dedicated Signal Processing Platform,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0790 2008 10.4271/2008-01-0790
- Rivara, N. Dickinson, P. Shenton, A. “Peak Pressure Position Control of Four Cylinders through the Ion Current Method,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0235 2009 10.4271/2009-01-0235
- Montgomery, D. G. Design and Analysis of Experiment Wiley & Sons 2000 10 0471316490
- Halliday, T. Lawrance, A. J. Davis, T. P. Engine Mapping Experiments: a Two Stage Regression Approach Technometrics 40 120 126 1998
- Rose, D. W. Cary, M. Zulczyk, S. B. Sbaschnig, R. Ebrahimi, K. M. An Engine Mapping Case Study - A Two Stage Regression Approach ImechE C606/025/2002 2002
- Morton, T. M. Knott, S. Radial Basis Functions for Engine Modeling ImechE C606/022/2002 2002
- Suzuki, K. Nemoto, M. Machida, K. “Computer-Aided Calibration Methodology for Spark Advance Control Using Engine Cycle Simulation and Polynomial Regression Analysis,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-4023 2007 10.4271/2007-01-4023
- Eriksson, L. “Spark advance for optimal efficiency,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0548 1999 10.4271/1999-01-0548
- Haskara, I. Zhu, G. G. Daniel, C. F. Winkelman, J. On Combustion Invariance for MBT Timing Estimation and Control ICEF2004 ASME Fall Technical Conference, ICEF2004-835 2004
- Corti, E. Forte, C. A Statistical Approach to Spark Advance Mapping Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 132 8 082803 101115/1.4000294 2010
- Corti, E. Forte, C. Spark Advance Real-Time Optimization Based on Combustion Analysis ICEF2010-35134, presented at the ASME ICEF Fall Technical Conference 2010
- Corti, E. Moro, D. Solieri, L. “Real-Time Evaluation of IMEP and ROHR-related Parameters,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-24-0068 2007 10.4271/2007-24-0068
- Corti, E. Cazzoli, G. Rinaldi, M. Solieri, L. “Fast Prototyping of a Racing Diesel Engine Control System,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-2942 2008 10.4271/2008-01-2942
- Wiebe, I. I. Semi-Empirical Expression for Combustion Rate in Engines Proceedings of Conference on Piston Engines USSR Academy of Sciences Moscow 185 191 1956
- Ikeda, Y. Nishiyama, A. Kim, S. Takeuchi, A. Wilnklhofer, E. Baritaud, T. Cyclic Variation of Local A/F (lambda) and Mixture Quality in SI Engine Using Local Chemiluminecence 7 th International Symposium in Internal Combustion Diagnostics 2006
- Aleiferis, P. Hardalupas, Y. Taylor, A. Ishii, K. Y. U. Flame Chemiluminescence Studies of Cyclic Combustion Variations and Air-to-Fuel Ratio of the Reacting Mixture in a Lean Burn Stratified-Charge Spark Ignition Engine Combustion and Flame 136 72 90 2004
- Heywood, J.B. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals McGraw-Hill 1988
- Ott, R. Lyman Longnecker, Michael An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis, 2010 2001 Brooks Cole, Cengage Learning 13 978-0-495-01758-5
- Worret, R. Bernhardt, S. Schwarz, F. Spicher, U. “Application of Different Cylinder Pressure Based Knock Detection Methods in Spark Ignition Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-1668 2002 10.4271/2002-01-1668
- Checkel, M. Dale, J. “Testing a Third Derivative Knock Indicator on a Production Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 861216 1986 10.4271/861216
- Millo, F. Ferraro, C. “Knock in S.I. Engines: A Comparison between Different Techniques for Detection and Control,” SAE Technical Paper 982477 1998 10.4271/982477
- Rao, S. S. Engineering Optimization, Theory and Practice J. Wiley & sons 2009 0470183527
- Franklin, G. Powell, J. D. Emani-Naeini, A. Feedback Control of Dynamics Systems Prentice Hall PTR 2006 10: 0131499300 13:9780131499300
- Goodwin, G. Graebe, S. F. Salgado, M. E. Control System Design Prentice Hall 2001 10: 0139586538 13: 9780139586538