This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Application of Mizenboushi (GD 3 ) Method of Problem Prevention to Vehicle, Component and Subsystem Validation
Technical Paper
2011-01-1275
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The GD₃ or GD Cubed method of problem prevention has been
applied to product changes and to test results at the component,
subsystem and vehicle level. GD₃ stands for Good Design - Good
Discussion - Good Dissection.
Good Discussion of changes (Design Review Based on Failure Mode)
identifies BUDS of PROBLEMS that may arise from interfaces and
areas of change. Good Dissection (Design Review Based on Test
Results) is applied to physical test samples during and after tests
to identify Buds of Problems that may not be obvious from
inspection of the parts or test results.
The paper first describes implementation of the GD₃ principles
and methods supporting Good Discussion (DRBFM) and Good Dissection,
and then discusses how they are applied and embedded in the Vehicle
Development Process at General Motors Co.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Wright, D., "Application of Mizenboushi (GD3) Method of Problem Prevention to Vehicle, Component and Subsystem Validation," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1275, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-1275.Also In
Reliability and Robust Design in Automotive Engineering, 2011
Number: SP-2306; Published: 2011-04-12
Number: SP-2306; Published: 2011-04-12
References
- Yoshimura, Tatsuhiko Toyota Style Mizenboushi (Preventative Measures) Method GD 3 , How to Prevent a Problem Before It Occurs JUSE Press Ltd. 2002
- Shimizu, H. Imagawa, T. Noguchi, H. “Reliability Problem Prevention Method for Automotive Components - Development of GD 3 Activity and DRBRM (Design Review Based on Failure Mode),” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-2877 2003 10.4271/2003-01-2877
- Allan, Lisa ‘Change Point Analysis and DRBFM : A winning Combination’ Reliasoft Reliability Edge 9 2