This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Kinematic FCW System Modeling and Application for FCW Warning Strategy Evaluation
Technical Paper
2011-01-0590
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
One method of reducing the number and/or severity of vehicle crashes is to warn the driver of a potential crash. The theory is that there will be driving conditions in which the drivers are unaware of a potential crash and a warning system will allow them to, in some manner, avoid the accident or reduce the severity. In an attempt to develop an analytical understanding of Forward Collision Warning systems (FCW) for frontal impacts a 2-d mathematical/kinematic model representing a set of pre-crash vehicle dynamic maneuvers has been built. Different driving scenarios are studied to explore the potential improvement of warning algorithms in terms of headway reduction and minimization of false alarm rates. The results agree with the field data. NHTSA's new NCAP active safety criteria are evaluated using the model. The result from the analysis indicates that the NHTSA criteria may drive higher false alarm rates. Opportunities of minimizing false positive rates are discussed.
Recommended Content
| Technical Paper | Influences of Parameters at Vehicle Rollover |
| Technical Paper | Threat Detection System for Intersection Collision Avoidance |
| Technical Paper | Performance of Driver-Vehicle in Aborted Lane Change Maneuvers |
Authors
Topic
Citation
Hsu, T. and Nusholtz, G., "Kinematic FCW System Modeling and Application for FCW Warning Strategy Evaluation," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0590, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0590.Also In
References
- The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study, Phase II - Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment DOT HS 810 593 April 2006
- Forward Collision Warning Requirements Project Final Report - Task 1, DOT HS 809 574 NHTSA January 2003 Washington DC
- Forward Collision Warning Systems Final Report Crash Avoidance Metrics Partnership (CAMP) March 12 1999 NHTSA Cooperative Agreement Number DTNH22-95-R-07301, DOT HS 808 964
- Lee, J. D. McGehee, D. V. Brown, T. L. Reyes, M. L. 2002 Driver distraction, warning algorithm parameters, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator DOT HS 809 448
- McLaughlin, S.B. Hankey, J.M. Dingus, T.A. Klauer, S.G. Development of an FCW Algorithm Evaluation Methodology With Evaluation of Three Alert Algorithms Final Report, DOT HS 811 145 June 2009
- Burgett, A. Carter, A. Miller, R. Najim, W. Smith, D. A Collision Warning Algorithm for Rear-End Collisions 16th International Technical Conference On the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) Windsor, Canada June 1 4 1998 Paper No. 98-S2-P-31
- Burgett, August L. Miller, Robert J. Jr. A New Paradigm for Rear-end Crash Prevention, Driving Performance National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Research and Development
- Kodaka, K. Otabe, M. Urai, Y. Koike, H. “Rear-End Collision Velocity Reduction System,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0503 2003 10.4271/2003-01-0503
- Docket 2006-26555 NCAP Forward Collision Warning System Test Procedures NHTSA March 2009 Washington DC
- U.S. DOT/NHTSA Memorandum: Submission of Questions and Comments Given to NHTSA Regarding NCAP Enhancements, NHTSA-2006-26555-0120
- Volvo Cars of North America - Comments NHTSA-2006-26555-0109.1
- American Honda Motor Co., Inc. US New NCAP Comments & Questions on FCW Confirmation Test Sep. 8 2008
- Forkenbrock, G. J. O'Harra, B. C. A Forward Collision Warning (FCW) Performance Evaluation ESV paper Paper No. 09-0561 2009
- Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation, National Center for Statistics and Analysis PROPOSED FMVSS No. 126 Electronic Stability Control Systems August 2006
- FMVSS No. 126 “Electronic Stability Control Systems”
- Prussing, John E. The relationship between Directional Heading of an Automobile and Steering Wheel Deflection June 1980
- DOT HS 808 964 (1999 CAMP Study) Development and Validation of Functional Definitions and Evaluation Procedures For Collision Warning/Avoidance Systems