This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Lightweight MacPherson Strut Suspension Front Lower Control Arm Design Development
Technical Paper
2011-01-0562
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The paper will discuss the results of a study to develop lightweight steel proof-of-concept front lower control arm (FLCA) designs that are less expensive and achieve equivalent structural performance relative to a baseline forged aluminum FLCA assembly. A current production forged aluminum OEM sedan FLCA assembly was selected as an aggressive mass target based on competitive benchmarking of vehicles of its size.
CAE structural optimization methods were used to determine the initial candidate sheet steel and forged designs. Two (2) sheet steel FLCA designs and one (1) forged steel FLCA design were selected and developed to meet specified performance criteria. An iterative optimization strategy was used to minimize the mass of each design while meeting the specified stiffness, durability, extreme load, and longitudinal buckling strength requirements. The manufacturing cost was estimated for the sheet steel designs relative to the baseline design for production volumes ranging from 30,000 to 250,000 vehicles per year.
The results of the study showed that a clamshell design, based on DP780 steel sheet, achieves equal mass to the baseline assembly and up to a 34% reduction in manufacturing cost. An I-beam design based on DP780 and DP980 sheet, DP780 tube, and HSLA550 was predicted to have a 2% mass increase, relative to the baseline assembly, and up to a 21% reduction in manufacturing cost. A forged design, based on AISI 15V24 grade material and a 3 mm minimum gage target, was predicted to have a 4% mass increase relative to the baseline assembly.
Recommended Content
Citation
Fuchs, H. and Salmon, R., "Lightweight MacPherson Strut Suspension Front Lower Control Arm Design Development," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0562, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0562.Also In
References
- Malen, D. “Auto/Steel Partnership Automotive Mass Benchmarking Report,” University of Michigan May 15 2010
- Optistruct User's Manual Altair 2009
- ABAQUS Standard User's Guide Simulia 2009
- nCode User's Guide 2009
- Hyperform User's Guide Altair 2009
- ASM Handbook Volume 01: Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys 10th
- AISI Bar Steel Fatigue Database www.autosteel.org
- Characterization of Fatigue and Crash Performance of New Generation High-Strength Steels for Automotive Applications Auto/Steel Partnership January 2003
- Borrego, L. P. et al. “Analysis Of Low Cycle Fatigue in AlMgSi Aluminium Alloys,” Engineering Failure Analysis 11 4 715 725 October 2004
- Anderson, D. Sang, J “Effects of Material Properties and Weld Geometry on Fatigue Performance of DP780 and Mild Steel GMAW Lap Joints,” Great Designs In Steel 2009 www.autosteel.org
- A/SP-340 Team Recommendation Southfield, MI December 18 2009
- Front Lower Control Arm Weld Modeling Guidelines, OEM proprietary document September 1 2009
- Chiriac, C. Chen, G. “Local Formability Characterization of AHSS - Digital Camera Based Hole Expansion Test Development,” International Deep Drawing Research Group IDDRG 2008 International Conference 16 18 June 2008