This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Improving Compressed Air Energy Efficiency in Automotive Plants - Practical Examples and Implementation
Technical Paper
2011-01-0325
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The automotive industry is the largest industry in the United States in terms of the dollar value of production [1]. U.S. automakers face tremendous pressure from foreign competitors, which have an increasing manufacturing presence in this country. The Big Three North American Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs)-General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler-are reacting to declining sales figures and economic strain by working more efficiently and seeking out opportunities to reduce production costs without negatively affecting the production volume or the quality of the product. Successful, cost-effective investment and implementation of the energy efficiency technologies and practices meet the challenge of maintaining the output of high quality product with reduced production costs. Automotive stamping and assembly plants are typically large users of compressed air with annual compressed air utility bills in the range of $2M per year per plant. This paper focuses on practical methods that the authors have researched, analyzed and implemented to improve compressed air system efficiency in automobile manufacturing facilities. It describes typical compressed air systems in automotive stamping and assembly plants, and compares these systems to best practices. The paper then presents a series of examples, organized using the method of inside-out approach, which strategically identifies the energy savings in the compressed air system by first minimizing end-use demand, then minimizing distribution losses, and finally making improvements to primary energy conversion equipment, the air compressor plant.
Recommended Content
Citation
Alkadi, N. and Kissock, K., "Improving Compressed Air Energy Efficiency in Automotive Plants - Practical Examples and Implementation," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0325, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0325.Also In
References
- Energy Trends in Selected Manufacturing Sectors: Opportunities and Challenges for Environmentally Preferable Energy Outcomes ICF International 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031 2007
- Alkadi, N.E. “Energy and Productivity, Two Sides of a Coin in the U.S. Auto Industry,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0833 2006 10.4271/2006-01-0833
- Galitsky, C. Worrell, E. “Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the Vehicle Assembly Industry- An ENERGY STAR® Guide for Energy and Plant Managers” Environmental Energy Technologies Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2003
- Kissock, K. Hallinan, K. Bader, W. “The Inside-Out Approach For Identifying Industrial Energy And Waste Reduction Opportunities” Journal of Strategic Planning for Energy and Environment, Association of Energy Engineers 21 1 2001
- “Inside-Out Analysis Identifies Energy and Cost Savings Opportunities at Metal Casting Plant, in Ford Cleveland Casting Plant (CCP) in Cleveland. Ohio” 2003
- Müller, Egon Löffler, Thomas Improving Energy Efficiency in Manufacturing Plants - Case Studies and Guidelines Department of Factory Planning and Factory Management, Chemnitz University of Technology Saxony, Germany 16th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering (LCE 2009)