This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Influence of Different Truck and Trailer Combinations on the Aerodynamic Drag
Technical Paper
2011-01-0179
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The aim with this investigation was to study the aerodynamic properties of truck-trailer combinations of varying lengths. The aerodynamic properties of the combinations were evaluated in order to study similarities and differences in the flow field between different configurations. By the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) six different types of truck-trailer combinations used for long hauling have been evaluated. The combinations have a total length varying between 10.10 m and 25.25 m and consist of either a tractor or rigid truck in combination with one or two cargo units. All of the combinations are commonly found on roads in Sweden and several other countries in Europe.
The results from the simulations show that the aerodynamic properties differ significantly for the truck-trailer combinations. It was found that the longer vehicle combinations are much more sensitive to yaw conditions than the shorter combinations. What was also evident is that the gap between the first and second cargo unit plays a significant role for the aerodynamic properties. Furthermore it was established that there is potential for fuel saving by a strategic choice of truck-trailer combination. According to the simplified evaluation made in this study the 25.25 m combinations show a lower power required per loading length (LL) and are therefore shown to be more efficient than the shorter combinations.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Martini, H., Bergqvist, B., Hjelm, L., and Löfdahl, L., "Influence of Different Truck and Trailer Combinations on the Aerodynamic Drag," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0179, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0179.Also In
References
- Gullberg, P. “Optimization of the Flow Process in Engine Bays - 3D Fan Modeling Strategies,” Licentiate thesis Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg 2009
- Lögdberg, O. “Turbulent Boundary Layer Separation and Control,” Ph.D. thesis KTH Stockholm 2008
- Leuschen, J. Cooper, K.R. “Full-Scale Wind Tunnel Tests of Production and Prototype, Second-Generation Aerodynamic Drag-Reducing Devices for Tractor-Trailers,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-3456 2006 10.4271/2006-01-3456
- Schoon, R. Fongloon, P.P. “Practical Devices for Heavy Truck Aerodynamic Drag Reduction,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1781 2007
- Schoon, R.E. “On-Road Evaluation of Devices to Reduce Heavy Truck Aerodynamic Drag,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-4294 2007 10.4271/2007-01-4294
- Cooper, K.R. “Truck Aerodynamics Reborn - Lessons from the Past,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-3376 2003 10.4271/2003-01-3376
- Ortega, J.M. Salari, K. “Investigation of a Trailer Underbody Fairing for Heavy Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag Reduction,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-2601 2008 10.4271/2008-01-2601
- Cooper, K.R. Leuschen, J. “Model and Full-Scale Wind Tunnel Tests of Second-Generation Aerodynamic Fuel Saving Devices for Tractor-Trailers,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3512 2005 10.4271/2005-01-3512
- Wood, R.M. “Operationally-Practical & Aerodynamically-Robust Heavy Truck Trailer Drag Reduction Technology,” SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 1 1 237 247 2008 10.4271/2008-01-2603
- Wood, R.M. Bauer, S.X.S. “Simple and Low-Cost Aerodynamic Drag Reduction Devices for Tractor-Trailer Trucks,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-3377 2003 10.4271/2003-01-3377
- Åkerman, I. Jonsson, R. “European Modular Concept for Road Freight Transport - Experiences and Possibilities,” 13:978-91-85665-07-5 2007
- Folketinget, Danmark “The European Modular System,” http://www.ft.dk/samling/20061/Lovforslag/L35/Bilag/17/319577.PDF Sept. 2010
- Odhams, AMC. Roebuck, RL. Lee, YJ. Hunt, SW. Cebon, D. “Factors Influencing the Energy Consumption of Road Freight Transport,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 2009
- Backman, H. Nordström, R. “Improved Performance of European Long Haulage Transport,” 91-88752-38-0 2002
- Burgess, A. van der Engel, A. W. Kindt, M.R.J. Schoemaker, J.T. Groen, R.J. Gützkov, P. “European Modular System Paper,” 2010
- Gilhaus, A. Hau, E. Künstner, R. Potthoff, J. “Über den Luftwiderstand von Fernlastzügen, Ergebnisse aus Modellmessungen im Windkanal - Teil I,” Automobil-Industrie 3/79 1979
- Gilhaus, A. Hau, E. Künstner, R. Potthoff, J. “Über den Luftwiderstand von Fernlastzügen, Ergebnisse aus Modellmessungen im Windkanal - Teil II,” Automobil-Industrie 3/80 1980
- Göhring, E. Krämer, W. “Auswirkung aerodynamischer Massnahmen auf Kraftstoffverbrauch und Fahrleistung moderner Nutzfahrzeuge - Teil 2,” Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift 87 1985
- Göhring, E. Krämer, W. “Auswirkung aerodynamischer Massnahmen auf Kraftstoffverbrauch und Fahrleistung moderner Nutzfahrzeuge - Teil 3,” Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift 88 1986
- Greenbaum, J. Kluger, M. “Aerodynamic and Mechanical Drag Characteristics of Light Trucks and Truck-Trailer Combinations,” SAE Technical Paper 932976 1993
- Hucho, W.H. “Aerodynamik des Automobils, 5 Auflage” Viweg + Teubner/GWV Fachverlage GmbH Wiesbaden 978-3-528-03959-2 2008
- Sitlani, M. Aung, K. “Numerical Simulations on the Aerodynamics Drag of a Tractor with a Tandem-Trailer,” 2 nd ASME Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, FEDSM 2006 2006
- CD Adapco “STARCCM+ Manual”
- White, F.M. “Fluid Mechanics, 5 th Edition” McGraw-Hill New York 007-124343-7 2005
- Petrushov, V. A. “Coast Down Method in Time-Distance Variables,” SAE Technical Paper 970408 1997 10.4271/970408
- Landman, D. Wood, R. Seay, W. Bledsoe, J. “Understanding Practical Limits to Heavy Truck Drag Reduction,” SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 2 2 183 190 2009 10.4271/2009-01-2890
- Cooper, K.R. “The Effect of Front-Edge Rounding and Rear-Edge Shaping on the Aerodynamic Drag of Bluff Bodies in Ground Proximity,” SAE Technical Paper 850288 1985 10.4271/850288