This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Catalyst Aging Method for Future Emissions Standard Requirements
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 12, 2010 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
This paper describes an alternative catalyst aging process using a hot gas test stand for thermal aging. The solution presented is characterized by a burner technology that is combined with a combustion enhancement, which allows stoichiometric and rich operating conditions to simulate engine exhaust gases. The resulting efficiency was increased and the operation limits were broadened, compared to combustion engines that are typically used for catalyst aging. The primary modification that enabled this achievement was the recirculation of exhaust gas downstream from catalyst back to the burner.
The burner allows the running simplified dynamic durability cycles, which are the standard bench cycle that is defined by the legislation as alternative aging procedure and the fuel shut-off simulation cycle ZDAKW. The hot gas test stand approach has been compared to the conventional engine test bench method. Comparisons of catalysts aged on the hot gas bench and an engine dynamometer showed similar results within the tolerance band.
An urban driving cycle was also run on the test bench with a diesel exhaust system that included a particulate filter working in regeneration mode. The drive cycle simulation on the test bench was able to provide an exhaust gas temperature profile within the catalyst, which represented the same thermal load as in the vehicle. The aging progress was monitored by a dynamic light-off measurement procedure.
The capability to produce heavily aged three-way catalysts on the test bench down to the OBD limit was also investigated. The profile of catalyst damage and the resulting effect on oxygen storage capacity and emissions, could be varied by adjusting the bench aging parameters.
CitationRuetten, O., Pischinger, S., Küpper, C., Weinowski, R. et al., "Catalyst Aging Method for Future Emissions Standard Requirements," SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1272, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-1272.
- European Commission “Regulation (EC) Nr. 692/2008 of the commission,” 18th July 2008
- California Low-Emission Vehicle Regulations “§1961(a-e) The LEV II exhaust emission standards,” April 17 2009
- Lafyatis, D.S. Petrow, R. Bennett, C. “The Effects of Oil-derived Poisons on Three-Way Catalyst Performance,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-1093 2002
- Ueda, F. Sugiyama, S. Arimura, K. Hamaguchi, S. et al. “Engine Oil Effects on Deactivation of Monolithic Three-Way Catalysts and Oxygen Sensors,” SAE Technical Paper 940746 1994
- McCullough, G. Douglas, R. McDowell, N. “Deactivation of Oxidation Catalysts by Oil-Derived Sulphur,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1738 2004
- Fridell, E. Skoglundh, M. “Model Studies of Sulphur Deactivation of NOx Storage Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0080 2004
- Ruß Gerald Flierl Rudolf Kairies Dirk “Katalysatorvergiftung von Ottomotoren durch Motorenöl,” MTZ 2005
- Rohart, E. Larcher, O. Hédouin, C. Allain, M. et al. “Innovative Materials with High Stability, High OSC, and Low Light-Off for Low PGM Technology,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1274 2004
- Degobert, P. “Automobiles and Pollution,” SAE International Warrendale, PA 1-56091-563-3 1995
- Bahn, M. “Herstellen von Alterungsgas für Abgasnachbehandlungssysteme” Patent Application, PCT/EP2008/006982 26th February 2008
- Environmental Protection Agency Federal Register “40 CFR Part 86 Emission Durability Procedures and Component Durability Procedures for New Light-Duty Vehicles, Light-Duty Trucks and Heavy-Duty Vehicles; Final Rule and Proposed Rule, Part IV,” January 17 2006
- Siebler Johann Schreiner Maximilian Zimmer Rainer Rieser Michael Hirschmann Axel Loose Gunter Richter Herwig Held Wolfgang Rohlfs Manfred «Gemeinsames Katalysatorprüfverfahren von Audi, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Porsche und VW, » MTZ
- Corkhill, W.J. Douglas Gilchrist, R.,N. “Method and Apparatus for Aging a Catalyst” UK Patent application, GB, 2356826A 6 6 2001
- Schmidt, M.M. Brady, M.J. Summers, C. Reizig, M. et al. “New Catalyst Preparation Procedure for OBD II-Monitoring Requirements,” SAE Techical Paper 2001-01-0933 2001
- Peyton Jones, J.C. Muske, K.R. “Model-based OBD for Three-Way Catalyst Systems,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0639 2004
- Ingram, G.A. Surnilla, G. “On-line Oxygen Storage Capacity Estimation of a Catalyst,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1000 2003
- Peyton Jones, J.C. “Modeling Combined Catalyst Oxygen Storage and Reversible Deactivation Dynamics for Improved Emissions Prediction,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0999 2003
- Hepburn, J.S. Gandhi, H.S. “The Relationship Between Catalyst Hydrocarbon Conversion Efficiency and Oxygen Storage Capacity,” SAE Technical Paper 920831 1992