This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Seatback Strength and Occupant Response in Rear Impact Crash: Observations with Respect to Large Occupant Size and Position
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 12, 2010 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Seatback strength and injury potential in moderate to high-speed rear-end collisions were investigated in a series of 12 HYGE sled tests. The test methodology included the use of instrumented Hybrid-III anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs). Four tests employed a 95th percentile male ATD ballasted to a total weight of 300 lbs and subjected to approximate 15 mph Delta-V impacts. The remaining tests employed an unmodified 50th percentile male ATD with impacts of approximately 25 mph Delta-V, and three ATD positions, including two "out of position" postures corresponding to leaning forward ("forward" position), and leaning forward and inboard ("radio" position). Seats from three different vehicles were tested, representing a range of strength values. Upper neck values for N
were less than 1.0 in all cases. Lower neck N
values sometimes exceeded 1.0 with the 50th percentile male ATD out of position, and these values did not trend with seatback strength. With the 300 lb ballasted 95th percentile male ATD, tested "in position," all values of N
in the upper and lower neck were less than 1.0. Thoracic spine loading did not demonstrate a relation with seatback strength. Lumbar spine compressive loads in the 50th percentile male ATD increased with seatback stiffness but were all within the range of loading associated with activities of daily living. Within the range of seatback strength tested and within the configurations observed in the present study, increasing seatback strength did not decrease injury risk.
CitationMcGowan, J., Levitt, A., Corrigan, C., Burnett, R. et al., "Seatback Strength and Occupant Response in Rear Impact Crash: Observations with Respect to Large Occupant Size and Position," SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1029, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-1029.
- Viano, D.C. Parenteau, C.S. Prasad, P. Burnett, R. “Stiff versus Yielding Seats: Analysis of Matched Rear Impact Tests,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0708 2007
- Warner, C.Y. Stother, C.E. James, M.B. Decker, R.L. “Occupant Protection in Rear-end Collisions: II. The Role of Seat Back Deformation in Injury Reduction,” SAE Technical Paper 912914 1991
- Burnett R Carter J et al. 2003 “The influence of seatback characteristics in cervical injury risk in severe rear impacts.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 36 4 591 601
- NHTSA 2004 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Seating Systems - Termination of Rulemaking
- Benson, B.R. Smith, G.C. Kent, R.W. Monson, C.R. “Effect of Seat Stiffness in Out-of-Position Occupant Response in Rear-End Collisions,” SAE Technical Paper 962434 1996
- Padmanaban, J. Burnett, R. Levitt, A.E. “Relationship between Seatback Stiffness/Strength and Risk of Serious/Fatal Injury in Rear-Impact Crashes,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 2 1 1099 1107 2009
- Mertz, H.J. Irwin, A.L. Prasad, P. “Biomechanical and Scaling Bases for Frontal and Side Impact Injury Assessment Reference Values,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-22-0009 2003
- Prasad, P. Kim, A. Weerappuli, D.P.V. “Biofidelity of Anthropomorphic Test Devices for Rear Impact,” SAE Technical Paper 973342 1997
- Bass CR Donnellan L et al. 2006 “A new neck injury criterion in combined vertical/frontal crashes with head supported mass.” Proceedings from the IRCOBI conference Madrid, Spain
- Hayes WC Nachemson AL et al. 1987 “Forces in the lumbar spine.” The Lumbar Spine Camins M. B. O'Leary P. F. New York Raven Press Books, Ltd.