This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Repeated Impacts on a Motorcycle Helmet: What Happens After a Significant Impact?
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 12, 2010 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
It is widely accepted that a motorcycle helmet will reduce the risk of a serious brain injury during an accident through energy dissipation. Currently, there is no literature on what happens to a motorcycle helmet after repeated significant impacts or why it cannot be re-used according to the DOT label. It is also unclear experimentally if the foam liner is permanently affected after repeated impacts. In this study, we repetitively dropped one style of DOT-approved motorcycle helmet using a drop tower system in accordance with FMVSS 218. Helmeted Hybrid III and magnesium headforms were dropped onto a flat anvil with contact to the apical region of the helmets. Strips of pressure-indicating film were placed in the mid-sagittal plane between the foam liner and the headform. Headform accelerations and head injury criterion (HIC) for the Hybrid-III headform were calculated for each drop test. There was a trend for maximum headform acceleration to increase with the number of impacts. The results suggest that a significant impact can degrade the protective ability of the helmet. This was consistently shown in both types of headforms. During the impacts, stress concentrations exceeding the plastic yield of EPS foam were consistently seen, indicating pockets of permanent deformation in the EPS foam. Surprisingly, even after the tenth impact, the helmets still retained some protective capability. This suggests that using a helmet that has sustained prior loading is still better than not wearing a helmet at all.
CitationLam, T. and Gates, D., "Repeated Impacts on a Motorcycle Helmet: What Happens After a Significant Impact?," SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1016, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-1016.
Safety Test Methodology and Structural Crashworthiness and Occupant Safety, 2010
Number: SP-2271; Published: 2010-04-13
Number: SP-2271; Published: 2010-04-13
- Code of Federal Regulations Title 49 2006 Chapter V-National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, Part 571-Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards Standard No. 218-Motorcycle helmets 10 1 2006
- Di Landro, L Sala G Olivieri D 2002 Deformation Mechanisms and Energy Absorption of Polystyrene Foams for Protective Helmets Polymer Testing 21 217 228
- Liu D-S Chang C-L Fan C-M Hsu, S-L 2003 Influence of environmental factors on energy absorption degradation of polystyrene foam in protective helmets Engineering Failure Analysis 10 581 591
- Scher, I.S. Harley, E.M. Richards, D. Thomas, R. “Likelihood of Brain Injury in Motorcycle Accidents: A Comparison of Novelty and DOT-Approved Helmets,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0248 2009
- ISO/DIS Draft Standard 6220 1983 Headforms for Use in the Testing of Protective Helmets
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice “Instrumentation for Impact Test - Part 1 - Electronic Instrumentation,” SAE Standard J211-1 Dec. 2003
- Standard Test Method for Apparent Density of Rigid Cellular Plastics American Standard for Testing Methods (ASTM) D1622-93 1993 349 351
- Standard Test Methods for Compressive Properties of Rigid Cellular Plastics American Standard for Testing Methods (ASTM) D1621-94 1994 346 348
- Mertz, H.J. “Biofidelity of the Hybrid III Head,” SAE Technical Paper 851245 1985
- Mertz, H.J. Irwin, A.L. Prasad, P. “Biomechanical and Scaling Bases for Frontal and Side Impact Injury Assessment Reference Values,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-22-0009 2003
- Prasad, P. Mertz, H.J. “The Position of the United States Delegation to the ISO Working Group 6 on the Use of HIC in the Automotive Environment,” SAE Technical Paper 851246 1985
- Hertz A. 1993 A Note on the Head Injury Criteria (HIC) as a Predictor of the Risk of Skull Fracture 37 th Annual Proceedings of AAAM
- Kleinberger M et al. 1998 Development of Improved Injury Criteria for the Assessment of Advanced Automotive Restraint Systems
- Kuppa S. 2006 Injury Criteria for Side Impact Dummies