This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effects of Mid-Level Ethanol Blends on Conventional Vehicle Emissions
Technical Paper
2009-01-2723
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Tests were conducted during 2008 on 16 late-model, conventional vehicles (1999 through 2007) to determine short-term effects of mid-level ethanol blends on performance and emissions. Vehicle odometer readings ranged from 10,000 to 100,000 miles, and all vehicles conformed to federal emissions requirements for their federal certification level. The LA92 drive cycle, also known as the Unified Cycle, was used for testing as it was considered to more accurately represent real-world acceleration rates and speeds than the Federal Test Procedure (FTP) used for emissions certification testing. Test fuels were splash-blends of up to 20 volume percent ethanol with federal certification gasoline. Both regulated and unregulated air-toxic emissions were measured.
For the aggregate 16-vehicle fleet, increasing ethanol content resulted in reductions in average composite emissions of both NMHC and CO and increases in average emissions of ethanol and aldehydes. Changes in average composite emissions of NMOG and NOX were not statistically significant. By segregating the vehicle fleet according to power-enrichment fueling strategy, a better understanding of ethanol fuel-effect on emissions was realized. Vehicles found to apply long-term fuel trim (LTFT) to power-enrichment fueling showed no statistically significant fuel effect on NMOG, NMHC, CO or NOX. For vehicles found to not apply LTFT to power-enrichment, statistically significant reductions in NMHC and CO were observed, as was a statistically significant increase in NOX emissions. Effects of ethanol on NMOG and NMHC emissions were found to also be influenced by power-to-weight ratio, while the effects on NOX emissions were found to be influenced by engine displacement.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Knoll, K., West, B., Huff, S., Thomas, J. et al., "Effects of Mid-Level Ethanol Blends on Conventional Vehicle Emissions," SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-2723, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-2723.Also In
References
- Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 H.R. 6, 110 th Congress 2007–2008
- Bechtold, R. Thomas, J. F. Huff, S. P. Szybist, J. P. Theiss, T. J. West, B. H. Goodman, M. Timbario, T. A. “Technical Issues Associated with the Use of Intermediate Ethanol Blends (>E10) in the U.S. Legacy Fleet,” ORNL August 2007
- Guerrieri, D. Caffrey, P. Rao, V. “Investigation into the Vehicle Exhaust Emissions of High Percentage Ethanol Blends,” SAE Technical Paper 950777 1995
- Orbital Engine Company “Market Barriers to the Uptake of Biofuels Study, A Testing Based Assessment to Determine Impacts of a 20% Ethanol Gasoline Fuel Blend on the Australian Passenger Vehicle Fleet,” Environment Australia March 2003
- Hochhauser, A. M. “Review of Prior Studies of Fuel Effects on Vehicle Emissions,” Coordinating Research Council Alpharetta, GA 2008
- California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resource Board “California Non-Methane Organic Gas Test Procedure,” July 2002
- Knoll, K. West, B. Clark, W. Graves, R. Orban, J. Przesmitzki, S. Theiss, T. “Effects of Intermediate Ethanol Blends on Legacy Vehicles and Small Non-Road Engines, Report 1 – February 2009
- Siegl, W. O. Richert, J. F. O. Jensen, T. E. Schuetzle, D. Swarin, S. J. Loo, J. F. Prostak, A. Nagy, D. Schlenker, A. M. “Improved Emissions Speciation Methodology for Phase II of the Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program—Hydrocarbons and Oxygenates,” SAE Technical Paper 930142 1993
- Loo J. F. Parker, D. T. “Evaluation of a Photoacoustic Gas Analyzer for Ethanol Vehicle Emissions Measurement,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0794 2000
- “Energy Policy Act (EPAct)/Testing Status,” Presentation by EPA to CRC Emissions Committee Meeting May 22 2008
- “Mid-Level Ethanol Blends Catalyst Durability Study Screening,” Coordinating Research Council Alpharetta, GA 2009
- California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board “Driving Patterns and Emissions: A New Testing Cycle,” 1996
- Durbin T. D. et al. “The Effect of Fuel Sulfur on NH 3 and Other Emissions from 2000–2001 Model Year Vehicles,” Coordinating Research Council Alpharetta, GA 2003
- Skoglundh M. Fridell, E. “Strategies for Enhancing Low-Temperature Activity,” Topics in Catalysis 28 79 87 2004
- Kobayashi, T. Nagatomo, S. Ishikawa, K. Yamada, T. “Improvement of NO X Performance and Thermal Stability in Pd-Based Catalyst,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-2927 2000
- Li, J. Theis, J. Chun, W. Goralski, C. Kudla, R. Ura, J. Watkins, W. Chattha, M. Hurley, R. “Sulfur Poisoning and Desulfation of the Lean NO X Trap,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-2503 2001
- Thoss J. E. Rieck, J. “The Impact of Fuel Sulfur Level on FTP Emissions – Effect of PGM Catalyst Type,” SAE Technical Paper 970737 1997
- Schleyer, C. H. Gunst, R. F. Eckstrom, J. Freel, J. Gorse, R. A. Barnes, G. J. Eng, K. D. Natarajan, M. Schlenker, A. M. “Effect of Fuel Sulfur on Emissions in California Low Emission Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper 982726 1998
- Schleyer, C. H. Eng, K. D. Gorse, R. A. Gunst, R. F. Eckstrom, J. Freel, J. Natarajan, M. Schlenker, A. M. “Reversibility of Sulfur Effects on Emissions of California Low Emission Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-1544 1999
- Yanowitz J. McCormick, R. L. “Effect of E85 on Tailpipe Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles,” Journal of Air & Waste Management 59 172 182 2009
- Code of Federal Regulations: Protection of the Environment CFR
- Nam, E. “Drive Cycle Development and Real-World Data in the United States,” Presentation at the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe January 2009
- Watson, H. C. Milkins, E. E. Preston, M. O. Chittleborough, C. Alimoradian, B. “Predicting Fuel Consumption and Emissions – Transferring Chassis Dynamometer Results to Real Driving Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper 830435 1983
- Watson, H. C. “Effects of a Wide Range of Drive Cycles on the Emissions from Vehicles of Three Levels of Technology,” SAE Technical Paper 950221 1995