This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Early Risk Identification and Cost-Benefit Analyses through Ergonomics Simulation
Technical Paper
2009-01-2287
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
For cost-beneficial reasons simulations with computer manikins have been increasingly used in the automotive industry for prediction of ergonomics problems before the product and work place exist in physical form. The main purpose of ergonomics simulations is to apply biomechanical models and data to assess the acceptability of the physical work load, e.g. working postures, visibility, clearance etc., which could result in requirements to change the design of the product. The aim is to improve ergonomics conditions in manual assembly and to promote a better product quality through improved assemblability (ease of assembly). Many studies have shown a clear correlation between assembly ergonomics and product quality and that poor assembly ergonomics result in impaired product quality and in decreased productivity. Nevertheless, there are remaining difficulties in achieving acceptance for changes of product and production solutions because of poor assembly ergonomics.
A recent study in the Swedish automotive industry showed that huge savings and increased profit margins can be obtained by eliminating ergonomics risk concepts in the very early product development process. The study confirmed a strong relation between poor ergonomics assembly solutions and quality errors of the product (car). There was a substantially increased risk for quality errors and increased costs for corrective measures of the product for assembly items of high and moderate physical work load compared to assembly items of low work load. The quality risk was increased 3 and 3.7 times, respectively. The overall cost for corrective measures in the assembly plant and for factory complete cars was 8.7 and 8.2 times higher for assembly items of high and medium physical work load compared to items of low physical work load.
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the need for ergonomics simulations of potentially harmful assembly concepts in combination with cost-benefit analyses of conceivable system solutions based on calculation of costs for quality errors related to poor ergonomics and poor assemblability. The intended end result of this research is a model by application of which it is possible to calculate the cost for quality losses and health effects due to poor ergonomics and compare it with the cost for improving the ergonomics with designers, manufacturing engineers and ergonomists as main users.
Authors
Citation
Falck, A., Örtengren, R., and Högberg, D., "Early Risk Identification and Cost-Benefit Analyses through Ergonomics Simulation," SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-2287, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-2287.Also In
References
- Arbetsmiljöverket Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health 1994 Job Adaptation and Rehabilitation, AFS 1994:1 0348-2138 Sweden
- Arbetsmiljöverket Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health 1998 Ergonomics for the Prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorders, AFS 1998:1 91-7930 331-1 ISSN 0348-2138 Sweden
- Arbetsmiljöverket Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health 2000 Manual Handling of Loads, AFS 2000:1 0348-3138 Sweden
- Arbetsmiljöverket Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health 2001 Systematic Work Environment Management, AFS 2001:01 1650-3163 Sweden
- Arbetsmiljöverket Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health 2008 The Work Environment Act 978-91-7464 478-4 Sweden
- Axelsson J. 2000 Quality and Ergonomics-Towards successful integration. PhD dissertation No. 616, Division of Quality and Human-Systems Engineering Linköping: University of Linköping Sweden 91-7219-652-1 225 244
- Bäckstrand G. Möller S. Högberg D. De Vin L.J. Sundin A. Case K. 2005 A Roadmap towards Cost Calculation Methods Connected to Ergonomics Analysis and Simulation Proceedings of the 37 th annual Nordic Ergonomic Society Conference Oslo, Norway October 10 12 312 82-995747-1-4.
- Broberg O. 1997 Integrating ergonomics into the product development process International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 19 317 327
- Chaffin D. 2001 Digital Human Modeling for Vehicle and Workplace Design. Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. Warrendale, USA
- Duffy V.G. 2008 Handbook of Digital Human Modeling: Research for Applied Ergonomics and Human Factors Engineering Taylor & Francis CRC Press 978-0805-85-646-0
- Eklund J. 1999 Ergonomics and quality management-humans in interaction with technology, work environment and organization International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 1999 5 2 143 160
- Falck A. 2002 Virtual ergonomics in car manufacture Proceedings of the 34 th Annual Nordic Ergonomic Society Conference Tammerfors, Finland
- Gröjer J.E. Liukkonen P. 1990 Bok för Arbetsmiljön. Arbetarskyddsnämnden Stockholm, Sweden 1990
- Hendrick H. 1996 Good Ergonomics is Good Economics In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40 th Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Santa Monica, California, USA
- Langaa Jensen P. 2002 Human factors and ergonomics in the planning of production International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 29 ( 2002 121 131
- Lämkull D. 2006 Computer Manikins in Evaluation of Manual Assembly Tasks Thesis for the Degree of Licentiate of Technology. Department of Production and Production Development. Production Systems, Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg, Sweden 2006 1652-9243 Report No. 14
- Maudgalya T. Genaidy A. Shell R. 2008 Productivity-Quality-Costs-Safety A Sustained Approach to Competitive Advantage-A Systematic Review of the National Safety Council′s Case Studies in Safety and Productivity. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 18 2 152 179
- OSHA, the European Agency for Safety and Health 2008 Fact sheet 76: National economics and occupational safety and health 10 01 2008 10 01 2008 http://osha.europa.eu/topics/business/performance June 2008
- Oxenburgh M. Marlow P. Oxenburgh A. 2004 Increasing Productivity and Profit through Health and Safety: The Financial Returns from a Safe Working Environment Taylor & Francis 0415243319
- Oxenburgh M. Marlow P. 2005 The Productivity Assessment Tool: Computer-based cost benefit analysis model for the economic assessment of occupational health and safety interventions in the workplace Journal of Safety research-ECON proceedings 36 209 214
- Price A. 2004 The Cost of Poor Ergonomics in Vehicle Manufacturing Assembly. School of Engineering, Coventry University, Coventry, Great Britain
- Scalia E. 2001 OSHA′s Ergonomics litigation record: three strikes and it′s out Journal of Labor Research 22 (1) 55 74
- Stephens A. Godin C. 2006 The Truck that Jack Built: Digital Human Models and their Role in the Design of Work Cells and Product Design Society of Automotive Engineers. Technical paper 2006-01-2314
- Sunwook K. Seol H. Ikuma L.H. Nussbaum M.A. 2008 Knowledge and opinions of designers of industrialized wall panels regarding incorporating ergonomics in design International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 38 2008 150 157
- VCC; Volvo Car Corporation, Manufacturing Engineering Göteborg, Sweden 2007 Requirement Specification for Load Ergonomics. Internal company document