This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Relationship with SN Ratio - Larger-the-better Characteristics with Finite Target
Technical Paper
2009-01-0791
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The concept of complexity is an essential constituent of axiomatic design and axiomatic quality. A reciprocal transformation is used to compute quality loss for larger-the-better performance characteristics in Taguchi’s methodology. El-Haik’s work on connecting robust design and axiomatic design with the help of mathematical relationships also considers the reciprocal methodology for larger-the-better functional requirements. Because of reciprocal transformation axiomatic complexity formulation for larger-the-better performance characteristics is different from that for smaller-the-better and nominal-the-best characteristics. Second, the signal-to-noise ratio based on complexity is also different for the same reason. This paper shows that a simple linear transformation in which a finite target is assumed can give more appropriate and comparable signal-to-noise ratio based on complexity for larger-the-better characteristics. Mathematical relationships are given and an example is employed to demonstrate the proposed methodology.
Authors
Citation
Sharma, N., Cudney, E., and Sharma, S., "Relationship with SN Ratio - Larger-the-better Characteristics with Finite Target," SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0791, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-0791.Also In
Reliability and Robust Design in Automotive Engineering, 2009
Number: SP-2232; Published: 2009-04-20
Number: SP-2232; Published: 2009-04-20
References
- Fowlkes, William Y. Creveling, Clyde M. 1995 Engineering Methods for Robust Product Design Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
- Genichi Taguchi Subir Chowdhury Shin Taguchi 1999 Robust Engineering McGraw Hill
- Taguchi, Genichi Chowdhury, Subir Wu, Yuin 2004 TAGUCHI’S Quality Engineering Handbook John Wiley & Sons, Inc
- Sharma, N. K. Cudney E. A. Ragsdell, K. M. Kioumars, P. 2007 “Quality Loss Function – A Common Methodology for Three Cases,” Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 1 3 218 234
- Sharma, N. K. Cudney E. A. Drain, D. Ragsdell, K. M. 2008 Implications of Quality Loss Function in Unified Methodology – LTB Case with Target SAE World Congress 2008 Detroit, Paper No. 2008-01-1435
- El-Haik, B. S. 2005 Axiomatic Quality – Integrating Axiomatic Design with Six-Sigma, Reliability, and Quality Engineering Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons
- Suh, N. P. 2001 Axiomatic Design – Advances and Applications Oxford University Press New York, Oxford
- Suh, N. P. 1999 A Theory of Complexity, Periodicity and Design Axioms Research in Engineering Design 11 116 131
- Lee, T. 2003 Complexity Theory in Axiomatic Design Massachusetts Institute of Technology