Try Mobilus Beta
Search tips
 This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Combining the Advantages of Simulation and Prototyping for the Validation of Dependable Communication Architectures: the TEODACS Approach

Journal Article
2009-01-0763
ISSN: 1946-4614, e-ISSN: 1946-4622
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-0763
Published April 20, 2009 by SAE International in United States
Combining the Advantages of Simulation and Prototyping for the Validation of Dependable Communication Architectures: the TEODACS Approach
Sector:
Citation: Armengaud, E., Watzenig, D., Karner, M., Steger, C. et al., "Combining the Advantages of Simulation and Prototyping for the Validation of Dependable Communication Architectures: the TEODACS Approach," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars – Electron. Electr. Syst. 2(1):309-318, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-0763.
Language: English

References

  1. Flexray Communications Systems Protocol Specification Version 2.1b available at http://www.flexray.com FlexRay Consortium 2005
  2. AVL Hybrid Development PlatformTM available at http://www.avl.com AVL List GmbH Mai 2007
  3. Armengaud E. A Transparent Online Test Approach for Time-Triggered Communication Protocols PhD thesis Technische Universität Wien, Institut für Technische Informatik, Treitlstr 1040 Vienna, Austria 2008
  4. Armengaud, E. Rothensteiner, F. Steininger, A. Pallierer, Roman Horauer, M. Zauner. M. A Structured Approach for the Systematic Test of Embedded Automotive Communication Systems IEEE International Test Conference (ITC’05) 1 8 Nov. 2005
  5. Armengaud, E. Steininger, A. Horauer M. Pallierer. R. A Layer Model for the Systematic Test of Time-Triggered Automotive Communication Systems 5th IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS’04) 275 283 Austria September 2004
  6. Baronti, F. D’Abramo, P. Knaipp, M. Minixhofer, R. Roncella, R. Saletti, R. Schrems, M. Serventi, R. Vescoli. V. FlexRay Transceiver in a 0.35 μm CMOS High-Voltage Technology DATE ’06: Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe 201 205 3001 Leuven, Belgium 2006 European Design and Automation Association
  7. CISC Semiconductor Design+Consulting GmbH Klagenfurt, Austria FlexRay Transceiver Model February 2007
  8. Eriksson, H. Vinter, J. Leiner, B. Schlager. M. Towards a decos fault injection platform for time-triggered systems 5th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics 1001 1006 2007
  9. ASAM e.V. AE[FBX] FIBEX Field Bus Exchange Format Version 3.0. www.asam.net Jan. 2008
  10. Gall H. Hintenaus P. Select the Right FlexRay Termination Scheme available at http://www.automotivedesignline.com Automotive Design Line March 2008
  11. Kajtazovic, S. Steger, C. Pistauer. M. A HDL Independent Modeling Methodology for Heterogeneous System Designs Behavioral Modeling and Simulation Workshop, 2005. BMAS 2005. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International 88 93 2005
  12. Kajtazovic, S. Steger, C. Schuhai, A. Pistauer. M. Automatic Generation of a Verification Platform for Heterogeneous System Designs ESCI Lausanne, Switzerland September 27–30 2005
  13. Karner, M. Steger, C. Weiß, R. Armengaud, E. Watzenig, D. Knoll. G. Verification and Analysis of Dependable Automotive Communication Systems based on HW/SW Co-Simulation In 13rd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA’08) 444 447 Sept. 2008
  14. Kopetz H. Bauer. G. The Time-Triggered Architecture Proceedings of the IEEE 91 1 112 126 January 2003
  15. Krause, M. Bringmann, O. Hergenhan, A. Tabanoglu, G. Rosentiel. W. Timing simulation of interconnected autosar software-components Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition, 2007. DATE ’07 1 6 2007
  16. Lari, V. Dehbashi, M. Ghassem Miremadi, S. Farazmand. N. Assessment of Message Missing Failures in FlexRay-Based Networks Dependable Computing, 2007. PRDC 2007. 13 th Pacific Rim International Symposium 191 194 2007
  17. Milbredt, P. Steininger, A. Horauer. M. Automated Testing of FlexRay Clusters for System Inconsistencies in Automotive Networks Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Symposium on Electronic Design, Test & Applications (DELTA 2008) 533 538 Jan. 2008
  18. NXP Semiconductors The Netherlands NXP FlexRay network simulations: Safeguard the operation of your FlexRay network architectures November 2007
  19. Peti, P. Obermaisser, R. Elmenreich, W. Losert. T. An Architecture supporting Monitoring and Configuration in Real-Time Smart Transducer Networks Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors 2002 2 1479 1484 June 2002
  20. Sonza Reorda M. Violante. M. On-line analysis and perturbation of can networks. In DFT ’04: Proceedings of the Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems 19th IEEE International Symposium on (DFT’04) 424 432 Washington, DC, USA 2004 IEEE Computer Society
  21. Smaili I. Real-Time Monitoring for the Time-Triggered Architecture PhD thesis Technische Universität Wien, Institut für Technische Informatik, Treitlstr 1040 Vienna, Austria 2004
  22. Thane H. Monitoring, Testing and Debugging of Distributed Real-Time Systems PhD thesis Mlardalen Real-Time Research Centre (MRTC), Department of Computer Engineering, Mlardalen University (MDH) 2000
  23. Tsai, J.P. Bi, Y.-D. Yang, S. Smith R. Distributed Real Time System: Monitoring, Visualization, Debugging and Analysis Wiley-Interscience New York, NY, USA 1996

Cited By

Recommended Content

Technical Paper A Cross Domain Co-Simulation Platform for the Efficient Analysis of Mechatronic Systems
Technical Paper Application of Robust Engineering Methods to Improve ECU Software Testing
Technical Paper STEPS TOWARDS AN OPTIMIZATION OF THE DYNAMIC EMISSION BEHAVIOR OF IC ENGINES: Measurement Strategies - Modeling - Model Based Optimization