This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Reliable TDC position determination: a comparison of different thermodynamic methods through experimental data and simulations
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 07, 2008 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
It is known to internal combustion researcher that the correct determination of the crank position when the piston is at Top Dead Centre (TDC) is very important, since an error of 1 crank angle degree (CAD) can cause up to a 10% evaluation error on indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) and a 25% error on the heat released by the combustion: the TDC position should be then known within a precision of 0.1 CAD. This task can be accomplished by means of a dedicated capacitive sensor, which allows a measurement within the required 0.1 degrees precision. Such a sensor has a substantial cost and its use is not really fast; a different approach can be followed using a thermodynamic method, whose input is the pressure curve sampled during the compression and expansion strokes of a “motored” (i.e. without combustion) cylinder.
In this work the authors compare an original thermodynamic method with other ones available in literature, by means of both experimental and simulated pressure curves. A zero dimensional thermodynamic model was employed to obtain an extensive collection of numeric pressure curves by changing engine geometry (e.g. compression ratios from 10 to 20 were adopted), operative conditions and wall heat transfer laws. The in-cylinder mass leakage has been taken into account in the model.
Moreover, in order to assess the reliability and robustness of each method, the typical measurement errors and disturbances related to indicating analysis have been taken into account. The capability of the investigated methods to provide the correct TDC position in presence of the above mentioned errors has been evaluated.
CitationPipitone, E., Beccari, A., and Beccari, S., "Reliable TDC position determination: a comparison of different thermodynamic methods through experimental data and simulations," SAE Technical Paper 2008-36-0059, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-36-0059.
- Pipitone Emiliano, Beccari Alberto. “A new thermodynamic method for TDC determination - Part 1 and 2”, actually under review process, downloadable at www.pipitone.dima.unipa.it/pubblicazioni.htm.
- Tazerout M., Le Corre O., Rousseau S., “TDC Determination in Ic Engines Based on the Thermodynamic Analysis of the Temperature-Entropy Diagram”, SAE Paper 1999-01-1489.
- Stas Marek J., “Thermodynamic Determination of TDC in Piston Combustion Engines”, SAE Paper 960610.
- Ylva Nilsson, Lars Eriksson, “Determining TDC Position Using Symmetry and Other Methods”, SAE Paper 2004-01-1458.
- Pipitone E., Beccari A., Beccari S., “The experimental validation of a new thermodynamic method for TDC determination”, SAE Technical paper, SAE number: 2007-24-0052, ISSN: 0148-7191, SAE International, (2007).
- Finol C. A. and Robinson K., “Thermal modelling of modern engines: a review of empirical correlations to estimate the in-cylinder heat transfer coefficient”, Journal of Automobile Engineering, Proc. IMechE Part D, Vol. 220, 2006
- Ramos J.I., “Internal combustion engine modeling”, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1989
- Horlock J.H. and Winterbone D.E., “The Thermodynamics and gas dynamics of Internal Combustion Engines”, Volume II, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1986
- Hribernik A., “Statistical Determination of Correlation Between Pressure and Crankshaft Angle During Indication of Combustion Engines”, SAE Paper 982541
- Randolph Andrew L., “Methods of processing cylinder-pressure transducer signals to maximize data accuracy”, SAE Paper 900170
- Brunt Michael F. J., Pond Christopher R., “Evaluation of techniques for absolute cylinder pressure correction”, SAE Paper 970036