This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Drive Cycle Analysis of Butanol/Diesel Blends in a Light-Duty Vehicle
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 06, 2008 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The potential exists to displace a portion of the petroleum diesel demand with butanol and positively impact engine-out particulate matter. As a preliminary investigation, 20% and 40% by volume blends of butanol with ultra low sulfur diesel fuel were operated in a 1999 Mercedes Benz C220 turbo diesel vehicle (Euro III compliant). Cold and hot start urban as well as highway drive cycle tests were performed for the two blends of butanol and compared to diesel fuel. In addition, 35 MPH and 55 MPH steady-state tests were conducted under varying road loads for the two fuel blends. Exhaust gas emissions, fuel consumption, and intake and exhaust temperatures were acquired for each test condition. Filter smoke numbers were also acquired during the steady-state tests.
The results showed that for the urban drive cycle, both total hydrocarbon (THC) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions increased as larger quantities of butanol were added to the diesel fuel. Oxides of nitrogen (NOx) were not significantly affected by the 20% butanol blend and decreased with the 40% butanol blend. Drivability of the vehicle decreased noticeably for the 40% butanol blend, especially for the cold-start urban drive cycle. Fuel consumption increased as the blend ratio of butanol increased, due primarily to the lower energy density of butanol compared to diesel. For the highway drive cycle, THC and CO emissions were not significantly impacted but NOx showed a slight increase as the butanol blend ratio increased. For the steady-state tests, a reduction in filter smoke number with increasing butanol quantity was observed. An 80% reduction in filter smoke number was observed for the 40% butanol blend.
CitationMiers, S., Carlson, R., McConnell, S., Ng, H. et al., "Drive Cycle Analysis of Butanol/Diesel Blends in a Light-Duty Vehicle," SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-2381, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-2381.
- Wallner, T. Miers, S.A. “Combustion Behavior of Gasoline and Gasoline/Ethanol Blends in a Modern Direct-Injection 4-Cylinder Engine” SAE Paper No. 2008 01 0077 2008
- Rice, R. Sanyal, A. Elrod, A. Bata, R. “Exhaust Gas Emissions of Butanol, Ethanol, and Methanol-Gasoline Blends” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 113 1991
- Price, P. Kar, K. Walmsley, H. ‘Particulate and Hydrocarbon Emissions from a Spray Guided Direct Injection Spark Ignition Engine with Oxygenate Fuel Blends.’ SAE Paper No. 2007-01-0472 2007
- Kapus, P. Fuerhapter, A. Fuchs, H. Fraidl, G. ‘Ethanol Direct Injection on Turbocharged SI Engines - Potential and Challenges.’ SAE Paper No. 2007-01-1408 2007
- Nabi, M.N. Ogawa, H. Miyamoto, N. ‘Nature of Fundamental Parameters Related to Engine Combustion for a Wide Range of Oxygenated Fuel.’ SAE Paper No. 2002-01-2853 2002
- Rakopoulos, D.C. Rakopoulos, C.D. Giakoumis, E.G. Papagiannakis, R.G. Kyritsis, D.C. “Experimental-stochastic investigation of the combustion cyclic variability in HSDI diesel engine using ethanol-diesel fuel blends” Fuel 87 2008
- Shih, L.K. “Comparison of the effects of various fuel additives on the diesel engine emissions” SAE Paper 982573 1998
- Mueller, C.J. Pitz, W.J. Pickett, L.M. Martin, G.C. Siebers, D.L. Westbrook, C.K. “Effects of oxygenates on soot processes in DI diesel engines: experiments and numerical simulations” JSAE Paper 20030193/SAE Paper 2003-01-1791 2003
- Nabi, M.N. Minami, M. Ogawa, H. Miyamoto, N. “Ultra low emission and high performance diesel combustion with highly oxygenated fuel” SAE paper 2000-01-0231 2000
- Heywood, J. ‘Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals.’ 0 07 028637 X 1988