This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Walkback Test: A Study to Evaluate Suit and Life Support System Performance Requirements for a 10 Kilometer Lunar Traverse in a Planetary Suit
Technical Paper
2007-01-3133
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
As planetary suit and planetary life support systems develop, specific design inputs for each system relate to a presently unanswered question concerning operational concepts: What distance can be considered a safe walking distance for a suited crew member exploring the surface of the Moon to ‘walkback’ to the habitat in the event of a rover breakdown, taking into consideration the planned extravehicular activity (EVA) tasks as well as the possible traverse back to the habitat? It has been assumed, based on Apollo program experience, that 10 kilometers (6.2 mi) will be the maximum EVA excursion distance from the lander or habitat to ensure the crew member's safe return to the habitat in the event of a rover failure. To investigate the feasibility of performing a suited 10 km walkback, NASA-JSC assembled a multi-disciplinary team to design and implement the ‘Lunar Walkback Test’. The test was designed not only to determine the feasibility of a 10 km excursion, but also to collect human performance, biomedical, and biomechanical data relevant to optimizing space suit design and life support system sizing. These data will also be used to develop follow-on studies to understand interrelationships of such key parameters as suit mass, inertia, suit pressure, and center of gravity (CG), and the respective influences of each on human performance.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Vos, J., Gernhardt, M., and Lee, L., "The Walkback Test: A Study to Evaluate Suit and Life Support System Performance Requirements for a 10 Kilometer Lunar Traverse in a Planetary Suit," SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-3133, 2007, https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-3133.Also In
References
- Gernhardt M. Lee L. Vos J. Preliminary Report of the EVA Walkback Test 2007
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Johnson Space Center Nutrition Requirements, Standards, and Operating Bands for Exploration Missions 13 Houston, TX 2005
- Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 14 5 377 381 1982
- Cooper GE. Understanding and Interpreting Pilot Opinion Aeronautical Engineering Review 16 3 47 51 1957
- Cooper GE. Harper RP. Jr. The Use of Pilot Rating in the Evaluation of Aircraft Handling Qualities NASA TN D-5153 1969
- Corlett EN. Bishop RPA. A technique for assessing postural discomfort Ergonomics 19 2 175 182 1976
- Hart SG. Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of experimental and theoretical research P.A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload Amsterdam: North Holland 1988
- Lee SM. Bennett BS. Hargens AR. Watenpaugh DE. Ballard RE. Murthy G. Ford SR. Fortney SM. Upright exercise or supine lower body negative pressure exercise maintains exercise responses after bed rest Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 29 7 892 900 1997
- Waligora JM. Horrigan DJ. Jr. Metabolic Cost of Extravehicular Activities Johnston RS. Dietlein LF Springfield VA:NTIS/NASA, Publ. No. NASA-SP-377 1977
- Watenpaugh DE. Ballard RE. Schneider SM. Lee SM. Ertl AC. William JM. Boda WL. Hutchinson KJ. Hargens AR. Supine lower body negative pressure exercise during bed rest maintains upright exercise capacity Journal of Applied Physiology 89 7 218 27 2007