This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Functional and Material Acoustic Optimization integrated into Underbody Systems for Vehicle Performance Improvement
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published May 15, 2007 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The first applications of plastic panels in the underbody targeted weight savings (elimination of the PVC coating) and aerodynamic drag reduction.
The potential for the integration of acoustic functions in such new elements, addressing both interior and exterior noise, was readily recognized and demonstrated in several studies. These also pointed out the synergic interaction of the new elements with common systems and components of the sound package.
While it was rather straightforward to define an acoustic design and optimization process, based on material modeling combined with component, system and vehicle SEA and FEM simulation, it also became clear that the integration of acoustic functions involved many problems that needed to be addressed in a multidisciplinary approach. This must consider the underbody elements as a part of a system having to fulfill functional requirements related to exterior and interior noise, aero-acoustics, aerodynamics for drag reduction and driving stability, thermal protection, thermal management in the engine compartment and in the tunnel area, protection of the body, assembly and durability. The harsh environment involves development of materials able to stand all the related OEM specifications, particularly demanding when the elements are designed to provide absorption in the cavity beneath the vehicle.
After a brief historic evolution and the state-of-art in underbody systems, the paper describes the various vehicle performance tuning options, including acoustic function integration. Several measurement campaigns demonstrate these important contributions.
Aerodynamic improvement up to 10% drag coefficient reduction, lift force reduction and noise reduction potentials up to 3 dB are shown. Since the management of thermal reliability and feasibility is elemental in those applications, this paper also describes thermal implications and solving strategies for an optimum and reliable solution.
Finally, concepts for cost minimization need to find place in such an analysis, in order to demonstrate successful routes for new applications.
|Technical Paper||Aeroacoustic Testing Improvements at Pininfarina|
|Technical Paper||The Audi Aeroacoustic Wind Tunnel: Final Design and First Operational Experience|
|Technical Paper||Vibro-Acoustic Analysis for Modeling Propeller Shaft Liner Material|
CitationMantovani, M. and Lehmann, D., "Functional and Material Acoustic Optimization integrated into Underbody Systems for Vehicle Performance Improvement," SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-2350, 2007, https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-2350.
- Mantovani M. et al. “Acoustic design methodologies for an innovative underfloor module”. Proceedings of the Rieter Automotive Conference, 2003.
- Lehmann D., Mantovani M., de Ciutiis H., et al. “Modern Underbody Systems”. Technical Handbook by Rieter Technologies AG, 1. Edition 2005
- Lehmann D. “Engineering of an Innovative Underfloor Module”. Proceedings of the Rieter Automotive Conference, 2003.
- Shepherd I.C., Fontaine R. F. “Microphone screens for Acoustic Measurement in Turbulent Flows”, Journal of Sound and Vibration 1986.
- Fahy F. J. “Measurement of Sound Intensity in Low Speed Turbulent Airflow”, Inter-noise 88.
- Semeniuk B. “The Simulation of the Acoustic Absorption and Transmission Characteristics of Automotive Material Configurations: the New SISAB Software”, Proceedings of the Rieter Automotive Conference 1999.
- Vigé D. et al. “Linking acoustic simulation tools for efficient computation of exterior noise in vehicles”. Proceedings of the Rieter Automotive Conference, 2003.