This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Restraint Robustness in Frontal Crashes
Technical Paper
2007-01-1181
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The protection of a vehicle occupant in a frontal crash is a combination of vehicle front structural design and occupant restraint design. Once chosen and manufactured, these design features must interact with a wide variety of structural characteristics in potential crash partners. If robust, the restraint design will provide a high level of protection for a wide variety of crash conditions. This paper examines how robust a given restraint system is for occupant self-protection and how frontal design can improve the restraint performance of potential crash partners, thus improving their restraint robustness as well.
To examine restraint robustness in self protection, the effect of various vehicle deceleration characteristics on occupant injury potential is investigated for a given restraint design. A MADYMO model of a 1996 Taurus interior and its restraint system with a Hybrid III 50th percentile male dummy are simulated and subjected to 650 crash pulses taken during 25 years of U.S. New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) testing, thus reflecting a wide range of frontal stiffness and corresponding crash pulses. The injury measures of the dummies in the simulations, with only the deceleration pulse changed, are compared to examine the robustness of the given occupant restraint system. Average deceleration is shown to have a high correlation with the MADYMO injury outcomes and thus provides an overall indication of structural performance in robust self protection.
In order to relate self protection to more detailed structural characteristics and robust compatibility performance, the average deceleration from the NCAP vehicles are analyzed with respect to the vehicle design metrics of weight, dynamic stiffness, dynamic crush, and the compatibility metric of energy stiffness. Of these, dynamic crush is shown to highly correlate with average deceleration in the NCAP vehicles, and thus self protection injury measures. Conversely, energy stiffness is shown to be nearly independent of average deceleration, thus opening the way to design for both high self protection and effective fleet compatibility.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Frontal Crash Testing and Vehicle Safety Designs: A Historical Perspective Based on Crash Test Studies |
Ground Vehicle Standard | Fixed Rigid Barrier Collision Tests |
Technical Paper | The Numerical Study for the Adaptive Restraint System |
Authors
Topic
Citation
Saunders, J., Smith, D., and Barsan, A., "Restraint Robustness in Frontal Crashes," SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1181, 2007, https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-1181.Also In
SAE 2007 Transactions Journal of Passenger Cars: Mechanical Systems
Number: V116-6; Published: 2008-08-15
Number: V116-6; Published: 2008-08-15
Vehicle Aggressivity & Compatibility in Automotive Crashes, 2007
Number: SP-2136; Published: 2007-04-16
Number: SP-2136; Published: 2007-04-16
References
- Agaram, V Xu, L Wu, J Kostyniuk, G Nuscholtz, G Comparison of Frontal Crashes in Terms of Average Acceleration SAE 2000-01-0880
- Alliance of Automotive Manufacturers Enhancing Vehicle-to-Vehicle Crash Compatibility - Commitment for Continued Progress Leading Automakers December 2003
- Deng, Y Wang, J “Computer Experiments for Optimal FMVSS 208 and NCAP Performance,” 38 th STAPP Car Crash Conference, Paper 942230 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 1994
- Kahane, C. Vehicle Weight, Fatality Risk and Crash Compatibility of Model Year 1991-99 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks NHTSA 2003
- Harland, Y The Evolution of the Three Point Seat Belt from Yesterday to Tomorrow IRCOBI Conference Madrid September 2006
- Hollowell, W.T. Gabler, H.T Stucki, S.L Summers, S Hackney, J.R Updated Review of Potential Test Procedures for FMVSS No. 208 Office of Vehicle Safety Research, NHTSA Oct. 1999
- Nusholtz, G.S Xu, L. Shi, Y. Domenico, L.Ds Vehicle Mass and Stiffness: Search for a Relationship SAE 2004-01-1168
- Nusholtz, G.S. Xue, J. Shi, Y. Famili, F. Xu, L. Rabbiolo, G. Effects of Different Vehicle Parameters on Car to Car Frontal Crash Fatality Risk Estimated Through a Parameterized Model SAE 2006-01-1134
- Park, P.T Hackney, J.R Morgan, M.M Chan, H Lowrie, J.C Devlin, H.E The New Car Assessment Program: Has it Led to Stiffer Light Trucks and Vans over the Years SAE 1999-01-0064
- Smith, D.L. NHTSA Compatibility Research Update, SAE Government Industry Meeting May 2006
- Swanson, J Rockwell, T Beuse, N summers, L Summers, S Park, B Evaluation of Stiffness Measures from the U.S. New Car Assessment Program Proceedings of the 18 th Experimental Safety Vehicles, Paper 527 Nagoya, Japan 2003