This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Motorsports Industry Knowledge Exchange (MiKE): Oxymoron or Holy Grail (An Imperative for Sustaining Regional, National and Global Competitiveness)
Technical Paper
2006-01-3610
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Of all high-performance engineering industries, motorsports perhaps exemplifies best the unique combination of key engineering and business elements vital for swift, industry-focused, successful, high-technology product advancement. This heady mix includes: complex market analysis; sophisticated research, design and development capability; rapid product innovation, prototyping and development; just-in-time manufacturing using state-of-the-art processes; and regular mandated exhibition of company competitiveness, involving (at the highest environs) demonstration of both personnel and new product capability and reliability, on an unforgiving world stage, invariably to ensure continuing investor (sponsor) confidence. Such examples of motorsport's disparate business model elements in many ways demonstrate fundamentally the industry's absolute reliance on what in corporate speak is now termed ‘brains trust’ or ‘human capital’.
Invariably, however, funding for academic faculties (certainly in the UK) is now predicated largely on speculative - and in many respects unrealistic - future student intake numbers, driven by institution/Government recruitment targets, which are rigorously-policed. The corollary is that institutions can now no longer simply be considered as seats of learning - instead, they increasingly reside, sometimes uncomfortably, in the aggressive business domain of skills, education, training and research provision, where the marketplace is open, competitive and formidably-discerning, and majors on informed, industry-driven service provision. Thus, it is surprising, but perhaps understandable, that the arranged marriage of the academia-based skills/expertise purveyor, and the ostensibly-eager industry recipient of such services, remains largely unconsummated.
The Objective of this paper is to:
- identify key enablers and inhibiters, perceived and actual, to successful motorsports industry-academe interaction;
- investigate inhibiters, to offer theoretical and practical insights into the reasons why key stakeholders in the process believe such barriers exist, indeed persist, and in some ways are perpetuated;
- provide instances of successes and failures in industry-academe technology and knowledge transfer;
- detail a number of mechanisms to aid the catalyzing of vital industry-academe technology and knowledge transfer.
Citation
Meechan, M., "Motorsports Industry Knowledge Exchange (MiKE): Oxymoron or Holy Grail (An Imperative for Sustaining Regional, National and Global Competitiveness)," SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-3610, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-3610.Also In
References
- Bamber, C. 2005 2005
- Henry N. Angus T. Jenkins M. et al 2002 ‘ A Study into the UK Motorsport and Performance Engineering Cluster ’ Motorsport Research Associates MIA, Warwickshire
- Financial Times 1990 ‘ Search for quality backing ’ 26th January 1990 London
- Henry N. Angus T. Jenkins M. et al 2002 A Study into the UK Motorsport and Performance Engineering Cluster Motorsport Research Associates MIA, Warwickshire
- Kirkpatrick, J. Faulkner, G. 2003 Workforce Development Plan MIA Warwickshire
- Stancombe, J. 2002 The UK Motorsport Industry Proceedings of the 10 th Welsh Economic Research Unit Conference Flexing Welsh Muscle: Sport and Economic Development 7 Cardiff
- Kirkpatrick, J. Faulkner, G. 2003 ‘ Workforce Development Plan ’ MIA Warwickshire
- Blacker, F. 1995 ‘ Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation ’ Organization Studies 16 6 1021 1046
- Marotti, F. 2001 ‘ Learning to share knowledge in the British and Italian motorsport industries ’ 4 5 Cardiff
- Henry, N. Pinch, S. 2000 ‘ Spatialising knowledge: placing the knowledge community of Moltor Sport Valley ’ Geoforum 31 2 1911 208
- DTI 2001 Business Clusters in the UK - A First Assessment DTI London
- Pinch, N. 1999 In Pole Position: Motorsports Successes in Britain and its lessons for the World's Motor Industry Euromotors Reports London
- ‘ A Second Draft Report for the DTI - Success Criteria for Success in Cluster Development ’ 19
- Porter, M. 1990 ‘ The Competitive Advantage of Nations ’ The Free Press New York
- OECD 2001 ‘ Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems ’ OECD Paris
- Porter, M. Ketels, H. M. K. 2003 DTI Economics Paper No. 3, UK Competitiveness: moving to the next stage DTI London
- Ecotec 2002 ‘ A Second Draft Report for the Department of Trade and Industry: Criteria for Success in Cluster Development ’ 2
- Ecotec 2002 ‘ A Second Draft Report for the Department of Trade and Industry: Criteria for Success in Cluster Development ’ 37
- http://www.cambridge-mit.org/cgi-bin/default.pl
- Ecotec 2002 ‘ A Second Draft Report for the Department of Trade and Industry: Criteria for Success in Cluster Development ’ 44
- Kirkpatrick, J. Faulkner, G. 2003 ‘ Workforce Development Plan ’ 31 MIA Warwickshire
- 2003 ‘ Report of the Motorsport Competitiveness Panel ’ Secretary of State for Trade and Industry July 2003 14 http://www.autoindustry.co.uk/docs/motorsportpanelreport.pdf
- DTI/SMMT 1999 ‘ Motorsports - a sector case study where the UK leads ’ http://www.eemsonline.co.uk/articles/01-03 99_1?template=template%2Fprintable.xml DTI London
- Faulkner, G. Kirkpatrick, J. 2003 ‘ Workforce Development Plan ’ MIA, Warwickshire
- 2003 ‘ Report of Technology and Innovation Group to the Motorsport Competitiveness Panel ’ 9
- Ecotec 2002 ‘ A Second Draft Report for the Department of Trade and Industry: Criteria for Success in Cluster Development ’
- Bell, E.R.J. Stott, M.A. Kingham, D.R. 1994 ‘ Oxfordshire Firms and Technology Transfer, Interactions between small and medium sized enterprise (SMEs) and the local research base ’ The Oxford Trust
- DTI, Oxford Innovation 1995 ‘ Best Practices in Industry - Academe Collaboration ’ DTI London
- Ecotec 2002 ‘ A Second Draft Report for the Department of Trade and Industry: Criteria for Success in Cluster Development ’ 46
- Rothwell, R. 1992 Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s ' R&D Management 22 3 221 239