This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison of Bioregenerative and Physical/Chemical Life Support Systems
Technical Paper
2006-01-2082
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Popular depictions of space exploration as well as government life support research programs have long assumed that future planetary bases would rely on small scale, closed ecological systems with crop plants producing food, water, and oxygen and with bioreactors recycling waste. In actuality, even the most advanced anticipated human life support systems will use physical/ chemical systems to recycle water and oxygen and will depend on food from Earth. This paper compares bioregenerative and physical/chemical life support systems using Equivalent System Mass (ESM), which gauges the relative cost of hardware based on its mass, volume, power, and cooling requirements. Bioregenerative systems are more feasible for longer missions, since they avoid the cost of continually supplying food. However, computations of the required ESM show that the much higher initial cost of biological/ecological human life support makes it much more expensive than physical/chemical life support even for multi-year missions. The least expensive life support for brief human missions uses direct provision of all food, water and oxygen from Earth without any recycling. The familiar breakeven and ESM ratio analysis repeated here confirms these well-known and widely accepted results. The inescapable conclusion makes the substantial past efforts to develop bioregenerative life support appear surprisingly impractical.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Jones, H., "Comparison of Bioregenerative and Physical/Chemical Life Support Systems," SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-2082, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-2082.Also In
References
- Czupalla Hornbeck Blome “The conceptual design of a hybrid life support system based on the evaluation and comparison of terrestrial testbeds,” Adv. Space Res. 2005 35 9 1609 20
- Doll, S. Eckart P. “Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS),” Larson W. K. Pranke L. K. Human Spaceflight: Mission Analysis and Design McGraw-Hill New York 2000
- Drysdale, Alan Thomas Mark Fresa Mark Wheeler Ray “OCAM - A CELSS Modeling Tool: Description and Results,” SAE Technical Paper No. 921241 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1992
- Gustan, E. A. Vinopal T. J. Olson R. L. “A Near-Term Mission for CELSS,” Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Environmental Systems 1983
- Gustavino, S. R. “A Study of the Effects of Bioregenerative Technology on a Regenerative Life Support System,” Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Environmental Systems 1991
- Hanford, Anthony J. “Advanced Regenerative Life Support System Study,” JSC 38672 March 3 1997
- BVAD Advanced Life Support Baseline Values and Assumptions Document August 2004
- Eckart, P. Spaceflight Life Support and Biospherics Kluwer Academic Dordrecht 1996
- ILO Initial Lunar Outpost Life Support System Baseline Design and Systems Assessment NASA ARC September 16 1991
- Reed, R. D. Coulter G. R. “Physiology of Spaceflight,” Larson W. K. Pranke L. K. Human Spaceflight: Mission Analysis and Design McGraw-Hill New York 2000
- Wieland, P. O. Designing for Human Presence in Space: An Introduction to Environmental Control and Life Support Systems NASA Reference Publication RP-1324 1994
- BVAD Advanced Life Support Baseline Values and Assumptions Document August 2004
- Jones, H. W. “Matching Crew Diet and Crop Food Production in BIO-Plex,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2000-01-2397 Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Environmental Systems 2000
- Jones, H. W. “Design Rules for Space Life Support Systems,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2003-01-2357 Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Environmental Systems 2003
- Jones, H. W. “Equivalent Mass versus Life Cycle Cost for Life Support Technology Selection,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2003-01-2635 Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Environmental Systems 2003
- Maxwell, S. Drysdale, A. “Assessment of Waste Processing Technologies for 3 Missions,” SAE Paper No. 2001-01-2365 31st International Conference on Environmental Systems 2001
- Hanford, A. J. 1997 “Advanced Regenerative Life Support System Study,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas
- Jones, H. W. “Design Rules for Space Life Support Systems,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2003-01-2357 Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Environmental Systems 2003
- Jones, H. W. “Matching Crew Diet and Crop Food Production in BIO-Plex,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2000-01-2397 Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Environmental Systems 2000
- Carrasquillo, R. L. Reuter J. L. Philistine C. L. “Summary of Resources for the International Space Station Environmental Control and Life Support System,” Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Environmental Systems 1997
- Eckart, P. Spaceflight Life Support and Biospherics Kluwer Academic Dordrecht 1996