This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Collaborating Human - Robot Swarms to Achieve Robust Space Exploration Capabilities
Technical Paper
2006-01-2022
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
NASA has determined that human and robotic systems will cooperate to enable the space exploration enterprise. This entails many possible forms of interaction from essentially separate sequential activities linked by data exchange (e.g. robotic precursor missions enabling subsequent human exploration) to intensely coupled simultaneous collaboration in human - robotic teams. These interactions as well as the individual robotic and human exploration system components must be shaped to make the total system robust and flexible in the face of exploration challenges that cannot be fully defined or anticipated. One powerful concept for this purpose is found in recent research on robotic “swarms”. Interacting robotic swarms have been studied in numerous research efforts as a potential means of achieving flexible and robust capabilities with comparatively simple robots. The availability of multiple robots and their ability to interact allows complex performance from the ensemble beyond the capacity of any individual, and the inherent redundancy of the swarm leads to robust capability in the face of hardware failures and unforeseen specific challenges.
This paper presents the results of a preliminary collaborative Hamilton Sundstrand - MDA study of this concept as applied to human - robotic space exploration by “swarms” comprised of more than one human and more than one robot working in cooperation. Our study is investigating this unique type of team which is typical of anticipated NASA exploration scenarios. We are placing a special focus on the “mini-swarm” comprising 4 human EVA astronauts and at least two robotically enabled planetary rovers implicit for early lunar missions in the recent ESAS report. We are seeking to identify opportunities for new interaction paradigms and emergent capabilities that result as well the unique challenges they create and the physical, data, and command and control interactions that are required to enable them. Concepts we are exploring, their implications for exploration systems development, and future plans for our research effort are discussed.
Authors
Topic
Citation
Ferketic, J., Hodgson, E., Rosenbush, D., Sidgreaves, R. et al., "Collaborating Human - Robot Swarms to Achieve Robust Space Exploration Capabilities," SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-2022, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-2022.Also In
References
- NASA SP-4212 On Mars, Exploration of the Red Planet, 1958 - 1978 National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Branch Washington, D.C. 1984
- Muirhead Brian Reeves Stevens Judith Garfield “Going to Mars” Pocket Books New York, New York 2004
- NASA Feature Baby Boomer on Mars http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mer/mer_feature_20060320.html 3 20 06
- Jones, E. M. “Apollo Lunar Surface Journal” July 2000 http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/
- NASA's Exploration Systems Architecture Study NASA-TM-2005-214062 November 2005 Jones, Christopher Vernon “A Principled Design Methodology for Minimalist Multi-Robot System Controllers” UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA August 2005 Cowen, Robert C. “A tiny robot swarm, fiction no longer” Christian Science Monitor April 7 2005 Dias, M. Bernardine Stentz, Anthony “A Market Approach to Multirobot Coordination” CMU-RI -TR-01-26 The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 August 2001
- Carr C.E. Newman D.J. Hodges K.V. “Geologic Traverse Planning for Planetary EVA” 33rd International Conference on Environmental Systems 2003
- Kosmo, J. J. Trevino, R. C. Ross, A. “ Results and Findings of the Astronaut - Rover (ASRO) Remote Field Site Test, Silver Lake, CA ( Mojave Desert)” CTSD-ADV-360 March 8 1999
- CTSD-ADV-470, JSC 40106, Results and Findings of the Representative Planetary Surface EVA Development Task Activities October 25 2000 Ames study ref. Mobile Agents: A Distributed Voice-Command Sensory and Robotic System for Surface EVA Assistance by William J. Clancey, Maarten Sierhuis, Rick Alena, Sekou Crawford, John Dowding, Jeff Graham, Charis Kaskiris, Kim S. Tyree, and Ronnie van Hoof 85 92 10.1061/40722(153)13) Engineering, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments: Earth & Space 2004
- NASA, Crew and Thermal Systems Division “Lunar/Mars Spacesuit Technical Requirements Document” CTSD-ADV-290 April 1997
- Huang, H.M. Messina, E. Albus, J. “Toward a Generic Model for Autonomy Levels for Unmanned Systems (ALFUS)” Proceedings of the Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems (PerMIS) Workshop September 16-18 2003 Gaithersburg, MD
- Parasuraman, R. Sheridan, T.B. Wickens, C.D. ‘A Model for Types and Levels of Human Interaction with Automation’ IEEE Trans. On Systems, Man and Cybernetics 30 3 286 295 May 2000
- Beetz, M. ‘A Roadmap for Research in Robot Planning’ http://www9.in.tum.de/research/tcu/roadmap.pdf
- Dupuis, E. Gillett, R. “Validation of Ground Control Technology for International Space Station Robot Systems” 6 th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space Montreal Canada May 2000
- Critical Considerations for Human-Robot Interaction Technical Report 03 Nov 2002 1 8
- Goldsmith, A. Wireless Communications Cambridge University Press 2005
- Akyildiz, J.F. et.al. “InterPlaNetary Internet: state-of-the-art and research challenges” Computer Networks 43 75 113 2003