This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Model for On-Line Monitoring of In-Cylinder Residual Gas Fraction (RGF) and Mass Flowrate in Gasoline Engines
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2006 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
In a gasoline engine, the unswept in-cylinder residual gas and introduction of external EGR is one of the important means of controlling engine raw NOx emissions and improving part load fuel economy via reduction of pumping losses. Since the trapped in-cylinder Residual Gas Fraction (RGF, comprised of both internal, and external) significantly affects the combustion process, on-line diagnosis and monitoring of in-cylinder RGF is very important to the understanding of the in-cylinder dilution condition. This is critical during the combustion system development testing and calibration processes. However, on-line measurement of in-cylinder RGF is difficult and requires an expensive exhaust gas analyzer, making it impractical for every application. Other existing methods, based on measured intake and exhaust pressures (steady state or dynamic traces) to calculate gas mass flowrate across the cylinder ports, provide a fast and economical solution to this problem. However, the accuracy of air mass flowrate and RGF calculations is highly dependent on the proximity of the pressure transducers to the valves. Additionally, since no simulation of gas dynamics in the engine manifolds is involved in the above mentioned approaches, tracking of external EGR flow is not possible, rendering those methods inapplicable in such instances. In this paper, a new approach is introduced for on-line monitoring of in-cylinder RGF and air mass flowrate, with the implementation of 1-D gas dynamics simulation. In this approach, the accuracy of the RGF calculation is not influenced by the location of pressure transducers and it is possible to “track” EGR flow from the exhaust to the intake system. The computer code is validated against test data and GT-Power modeling results of air mass flowrate, in-cylinder pressure traces and RGF predictions. The code can be run on any platform and execution time is under 20 seconds per case for 10 simulation cycles, and under 5 seconds for 2 simulation cycles with 99.7% convergence. This encompasses on-line tracking of air mass flow and RGF.
CitationLiu, J., Kleeberg, H., Tomazic, D., Ciaravino, J. et al., "A Model for On-Line Monitoring of In-Cylinder Residual Gas Fraction (RGF) and Mass Flowrate in Gasoline Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0656, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-0656.
- Ford Richard Collings Nick “Measurement of Residual Gas Fraction using a Fast Response NO Sensor” SAE 1999-01-0208 1999
- Alger Terry Wooldridge Steven “Measurement and Analysis of the Residual Gas Fraction in an SI Engine with Variable Cam Timing” SAE 2004-01-1356
- Jang Jinyoung Yeom Kitae Bae Choongsik “Effects of Exhaust Throttling on Engine Performance and Residual Gas in an SI engine” SAE 2004-01-2974
- Shayler Paul J. Winborn Lorne D. Hill Martin J. Eade Derek “The Influence of Gas/Fuel Ratio on Combustion Stability and Misfire Limits of Spark-Ignition Engines” SAE 2000-01-1208
- Giansetti Pascal Chamaillard Yann Charlet Alain Higelin Pascal Couet Sebastien “A Model for Residual Gas Fraction Prediction in Spark Ignition Engines” SAE 2002-01-1735
- Cavina Nicolò Siviero Carlo Suglia Rosanna “Residual Gas Fraction Estimation: Application to a GDI Engine With Variable Valve Timing and EGR” SAE 2004-01-2943
- Schwarz F. Spicher U. “Determination of Residual Gas Fraction in IC Engines” SAE 2003-01-3148
- Koehler Uwe Bargende Michael “A Model for a Fast Prediction of the In-Cylinder Residual Gas Mass” SAE 2004-01-3053
- Liu Jing Ping Schorn Norbert Schernus Christof Peng Lixin “Comparison of Method of Characteristics with Finite Difference Methods on One-Dimensional Gas Flow in IC Engine Manifold” SAE 960078