This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Investigation of the Effect of Sample Size on Fatigue Endurance Limit of a Carburized Steel
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2006 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Prediction of fatigue performance of large structures and components is generally done through the use of a fatigue analysis software, FEA stress/strain analysis, load spectra, and materials properties generated from laboratory tests with small specimens. Prior experience and test data has shown that a specimen size effect exists, i.e. the fatigue strength or endurance limit of large members is lower than that of small specimens made of same material. Obviously, the size effect is an important issue in fatigue design of large components. However a precise experimental study of the size effect is very difficult for several reasons. It is difficult to prepare geometrically similar specimens with increased volume which have the same microstructures and residual stress distributions throughout the entire material volume to be tested. Fatigue testing of large samples can also be a problem due to the limitation of load capacity of the test systems available.
In this study, we investigate the sample volume effect on fatigue endurance limit through both experimental and computational approaches. Bending fatigue tests were conducted and stress life (S-N) test results of two specimen sizes (highly stressed material volume ratio 6:1) made of carburized 4320 steel were obtained. In the computational analysis work, first, deterministic fracture mechanics based software package CRACKS was used to generate S-N curves of two specimen sizes. The computationally generated S-N curves were then compared with the test results and they agreed with test results quite well. However, the deterministic fatigue life analysis using the CRACKS software did not show any size effect, i.e. same endurance limits were obtained for the two different sample sizes.
Since the deterministic approach cannot capture the size effect, stochastic fracture mechanics analysis was then performed which is based on the following premises. Larger components have a greater volume of material, and thus a larger population of material related initial defects, such as inclusions and surface oxidation layer. Statistically, a larger population contains more extreme defect sizes, both large and small. The presence of larger defects leads to crack growth and failures at lower stress levels, hence a lower endurance limit. In the stochastic analysis, we used the alternating finite element method and linear elastic fracture mechanics to compute the endurance limits of the two specimen sizes with high stressed material volume ratio of 6:1. Larger sample volume reduced endurance limit by 3% to 30% depending on the input data used. We also performed sensitivity studies to evaluate the effect of crack aspect ratio, initial defect size range, defect location, and material's crack growth threshold value ΔKth, on the size effect.
|Technical Paper||Surface Residual Stress in Automotive Components: Measurement and Effects on Fatigue Life|
|Technical Paper||Investigation of S-N Test Data Scatter of Carburized 4320 Steel|
|Technical Paper||Design of Powder Metal Transfer Case Sprockets|
- Hong Lin - Dana Corporation
- Robert R. Binoniemi - Dana Corporation
- Gregory A. Fett - Dana Corporation
- Thomas Woodard - Dana Corporation
- Edward F. Punch - Punch Software Solutions
- Chester Van Tyne - Colorado School of Mines
- Brian C. Taylor - Colorado School of Mines
- David K. Matlock - Colorado School of Mines
CitationLin, H., Binoniemi, R., Fett, G., Woodard, T. et al., "Investigation of the Effect of Sample Size on Fatigue Endurance Limit of a Carburized Steel," SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0539, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-0539.
SAE 2006 Transactions Journal of Materials and Manufacturing
Number: V115-5 ; Published: 2007-03-30
Number: V115-5 ; Published: 2007-03-30
- Horger O.J., Fatigue Characteristics of Large Sections, Fatigue, ASM, 1953.
- Phillips C.E., Heywood R.B., Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., London, Vol 165. 1951, pp. 113-124.
- Kuguel R., Proc. ASTM, Vol. 61, 1961, pp. 732-748.
- Weibull W., The phenomenon of rupture in solids, Proc. R Swed Inst Eng Res, 1939, 153:1-55
- Weibull W., A statistical representation of fatigue failures in solids, Proc. R. Inst. Tech., 1949, 27.
- Flaceliere L., and Morel F., Probabilistic approach in high-cycle multiaxial fatigue: volume and surface effect, Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct, 27, 2004, pp. 1123-1135.
- Papadopoulos I.V., Panoskaltsis V.P., Invariant formulation of a gradient dependent multiaxial high cycle fatigue criterion, Engineering. Fracture Mech., 55, 1996, pp. 513-528.
- Morel F., Palin-Luc T., A non local theory applied in high cycle multiaxial fatigue, Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct., 2002, 25, pp. 649-665.
- Bazant Z.P., Yavari A., Is the cause of size effect on structural strength fractal or energetic-statistical? Engng. Fracture Mechanics, 2005, 72, pp.1-31.
- Lawrence F.V., Dimitrakis S.D., and Munse W.H., Factors Incluencing Weldment Fatigue, 1996, ASM Handbook, Volume 19, Fatigue and Fracture, pp. 274-286.
- Pingsha Dong, Recent Advances in Weld Fatigue Research and Introduction to Verity Structural Stress Method, 2005, Weld Fatigue Verity Method Training Class notes, Battelle Institute, Columbus, Ohio.
- Hyde R.S., Cohen R.E., Matlock D.K., Krauss G., Bending Fatigue Crack Characterization and Fracture Toughness of Gas Carburized SAE 4320 Steel, SAE paper 920534.
- Hyde R.S., Krauss G., Matlock D.K., The Effect of Reheat Treatment on Fatigue and Fracture of Carburized Steels, SAE Paper 940788.
- Spice J.J., Matlock D.K., Fett G.A., Optimized Carburized Steel Fatigue Performance as Assessed with Gear and Modified Brugger Fatigue Tests, SAE Paper 2002-01-1003.
- CRACKS Program Manual, University of Dayton Research Institute, Dayton, Ohio, 1999.
- Leibensperger R.L., Stover J.D., 1999, Inclusions, Rolling Contact Fatigue and Power Dense Transmission Design, Proc. Int. Conf. On Low Residual Steels, Jamshedpur, India.
- Lepikhin A.M., Makhutov N.A., Moskvichev V.V., Doronin S.V., Probabilistic modeling of safe crack growth and estimation of the durability of structures, Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct., 23, 2000, 395-401.
- Punch E.F., Kim C-M, Sant F., Finite Element Fatigue Without Crack Meshing, with Application to Casting, SAE paper 960570, 1996.
- Nishioka T., Atluri S.N., Analytical solution for embedded elliptic cracks, and finite element alternating method for elliptical surface cracks, subjected to arbitrary loadings, Engng. Fract. Mech., Vol. 17, 3, 1983, 247-268.
- Lin Hong, Deis Mick, Binoniemi Robert, Combs Dana and Woodard Tom, 2005, Cyclic Deformation, Fatigue Life and Fracture Toughness of a Nano-Composite High Strength Steel, SAE Paper 2005-01-3629, published at SAE Commercial Vehicle Engineering Congress, Nov. 2005
- Suresh S. Fatigue of Materials, 1998, Cambridge University Press, page 547
- AISI Bar Steel Fatigue Database, 2005