This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Sensitivity Study of Probit and Two-Point Fatigue Testing Methods
Technical Paper
2006-01-0536
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Fatigue strength mean and standard deviation may be estimated by the Probit and 2-Point test methods. In this paper, methodologies for conducting the tests are developed and results from Monte Carlo simulation are presented. The results are compared with those from concurrent testing with the staircase method. While the Probit and 2-Point methods are intuitively attractive, their results are significantly different from those from the staircase method. The latter remains the best of the three.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Song, J., Crepeau, P., Gu, R., and Mourelatos, Z., "Sensitivity Study of Probit and Two-Point Fatigue Testing Methods," SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0536, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-0536.Also In
References
- Song, J. Crepeau, P. N. Mourelatos, Z. P. Gu, R. J. Sensitivity Study of Staircase Fatigue Tests Using Monte Carlo Simulation SAE Paper 2005-01-0803
- Hertzberg, R. W. Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1976
- Metals Handbook: Mechanical Testing 8 ASM International 1985
- Dieter, G. E. Mechanical Metallurgy McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1976
- American Society A Guide for Fatigue Testing and the Statistical Analysis of Fatigue Data ASTM Philadelphia 1963
- Little, R. E. Manual on Statistical Planning and Analysis for Fatigue Experiments ASTM Philadelphia 1985
- Collins J. A. Failure of Materials in Mechanical Design A Wiley-Interscience Publication 1980
- Dixon J. W. Mood A. M. “A Method for Obtaining and Analyzing Sensitivity Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 43 1948 109 126
- Neyer, B. T. Sensitivity Testing and Analysis Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Pyrotechnics Seminar Jönköping, Sweden April 1994