This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Emissions Performance of GTL Diesel Fuel and Blends with Optimized Engine Calibrations
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published May 11, 2005 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The results of a comprehensive experimental investigation into the exhaust emission performance and combustion properties of neat and blended Gas-To-Liquids (GTL) diesel fuel are presented. A sulphur-free European diesel fuel was used as the reference fuel, and two blends of the GTL diesel fuel with the reference fuel, containing 20% and 50% GTL diesel fuel respectively, were investigated. The study was based on a Mercedes Benz 2.2 liter passenger car diesel engine and presents emission data for both the standard engine calibration settings, as well as settings which were optimized to match the characteristics of each fuel.
Vehicle emission tests showed that the GTL diesel fuel results in reductions in HC and CO emissions of greater than 90%, while PM is reduced by 30%, and NOx remains approximately unchanged. Engine bench dynamometer tests showed reductions in soot of between 30% and 60%, and NOx reductions of up to 10% with the GTL diesel fuel, depending on the operating point. Results with the GTL diesel blends showed a pronounced non-linear response, with reductions in emissions generally being larger than indicated by the blending ratio, to the extent that the emission performance of the 50% blend was similar to that of the neat GTL diesel fuel.
Optical engine tests were carried out to investigate the combustion properties of the neat GTL diesel fuel in more detail. In addition to reflecting the better ignition quality of the GTL diesel, these tests also showed that it has better vaporization characteristics and a more uniformly distributed flame structure.
A design of experiments (DOE) approach was used to optimize the injection settings and EGR rates for each fuel in order to obtain the most favourable NOx-soot trade-off. By this means it was estimated that simultaneous reductions of 35% in both NOx and PM could be obtained in the vehicle emission test with GTL diesel fuel, with an optimized engine calibration. The corresponding estimated reductions with the 50% and 20% blends of GTL diesel are 30% and 15% respectively, again reflecting the non-linear exhaust emission response of the blended fuels.
|Technical Paper||The Emission Performance of a GTL Diesel Fuel - a Japanese Market Study|
|Technical Paper||GTL Fuel Impact on DI Diesel Emissions|
|Technical Paper||Effects of GTL Fuel Properties on DI Diesel Combustion|
CitationSchaberg, P., Botha, J., Schnell, M., Hermann, H. et al., "Emissions Performance of GTL Diesel Fuel and Blends with Optimized Engine Calibrations," SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-2187, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-2187.
SAE 2005 Transactions Journal of Fuels and Lubricants
Number: V114-4; Published: 2006-02-01
Number: V114-4; Published: 2006-02-01
- Alleman, T.L. McCormick, R.L. “Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Fuels - Properties and Exhaust Emissions: a Literature Review” SAE Paper 2003-01-0763 2003
- May, M.P. et al “Development of Truck Engine Technologies for Use with Fischer-Tropsch Fuels” SAE Paper 2001-01-3520 2001
- Schaberg, P.W. et al “An Overview of the Production, Properties, and Exhaust Emissions Performance of Sasol Slurry Phase Distillate Diesel Fuel” 2 nd International Colloquium on Fuels Technische Akademie Esslingen 1999
- Morgan P.M. et al “Some Comparative Chemical, Physical and Compatibility Properties of Sasol Slurry Phase Distillate Diesel Fuel” SAE Paper 982488 1998
- Keppeler, S. et al “Impact of Synthetic Fuels Characteristics on Emissions and Engine Behavior” 5 th International Colloquium on Fuels Teschnische Akademie Esslingen 2005
- Hermann, H-O. Pelz, N. Maly, R.R. Botha, J.J. Schaberg, P.W. Schnell, M. “Effect of GTL Diesel Fuels on Emissions and Engine Performance” Vienna International Motor Symposum 2004
- Payri, F. et al “Characterisation of the Injection-Combustion Process in a Common Rail D.I. Diesel Engine Running with Sasol Fischer-Tropsch Fuel” SAE Paper 2000-01-1803 2000
- Myburgh, I.S. et al “The Emission Performance of a GTL Diesel Fuel - a Japanese Market Study” SAE Paper 2003-01-1946 2003
- Schaberg, P.W. et al “Diesel Exhaust Emissions Using Sasol Slurry Phase Distillate Process Fuels” SAE Paper 972898 1997
- Schaberg, P.W. Myburgh, I.S. Botha, J.J. Khalek, I.A. “Comparative Emissions Performance of Sasol Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Fuel in current and Older Technology Heavy-Duty Engines.” SAE Paper 2000-01-1912 2000
- Koyanagi, K. Öing, H. Renner, G. Maly, R.R. “Optimising Common Rail Injection by Optical Diagnostics in a Transparent Production Type Diesel Engine” SAE Paper 1999-01-3646 1999
- Siebers, D.L. “Liquid-phase fuel penetration in diesel sprays” SAE Paper 980809 1998
- Yates, A.D.B. Viljoen, C.L. Swarts, A. “Understanding the Relation between Cetane Number and Combustion Bomb Ignition Delay Measurements” SAE Paper 2004-01-2017 2004
- Natarajan, M. et al “Oxygenates for Advanced Petroleum Based Fuels: Part One. Screening and Selection Methodology for Oxygenates” SAE Paper 2001-01-3631 2001
- Haynes, B.S. Wagner, H.Gg. “Soot Formation” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 7 1981 229 273
- Azetsu, A. Sato, Y. Wakisaka, Y. “Effects of Aromatic Components in Fuel on Flame Temperature and Soot Formation in Intermittent Spray Combustion” SAE Paper 2003-01-1913 2003
- Heywood, J. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals McGraw Hill 1988 638 639
- Ryan, T.W. et al “The Effects of Fuel Properties on Emissions from a 2.5gm NOx Heavy Duty Diesel Engine.” SAE Paper 982491 1998