This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Bauschinger Effect Response of Automotive Sheet Steels
Technical Paper
2005-01-0084
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
In a study of the Bauschinger effect, data were collected from three sources in the published literature. Quantitative stress-strain data were taken from these papers, and the results re-analyzed. The resulting database has 44 lots of sheet steels, including drawing quality, interstitial free, bake hardening, HSLA (and related grades), dual phase, TRIP, recovery annealed, and martensitic grades. In analyzing the data, it is found that use of the 0.05% yield strength on reversal instead of the conventional 0.2% yield strength provides more generality in explaining the results. In this analysis, the Bauschinger effect is characterized by a term (BE), which is the difference between the steel strength just prior to reversal and the 0.05% yield strength on reversal normalized by the strength just prior to reversal. An initial prestrain of 2% is needed to establish a dislocation morphology that can be generalized across many of the steel grades. For steels with a predominantly ferrite microstructure and no added interstitial elements, BE exhibits a single monotonic trend line with respect to the strength just prior to reversal. For the bake hardenable grades, the 0.05% yield strength on reversal is slightly greater than the trend line. For the DP980, TRIP, and martensite grades, the 0.05% yield strength on reversal is considerably greater than the trend line. These steel grades either initially or after deformation have a greater volume fraction of martensite. The recovery annealed steels, which possess a much greater dislocation density, also exhibit 0.05% yield strengths that are significantly greater than the trend line. For steels with a predominantly ferrite microstructure over a wide range of strength, the single characteristic curve indicates that the initial reverse yield strength can be determined from the strength at the point just prior to the reversal. For modelers of sheet forming processes, the relationship between strength and yield on reversal can be used in material constitutive equations.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Han, K., Van Tyne, C., and Levy, B., "Bauschinger Effect Response of Automotive Sheet Steels," SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0084, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-0084.Also In
References
- Han K. Van Tyne C.J. Levy B.S. “Effect of Strain and Strain Rate on the Bauschinger Effect Response of Three Different Steels” Metallurgical Transactions A
- Han K. “The Effect of Strain and Strain Rate on the Bauschinger Effect Response of Three Different Steels” Colorado School of Mines 2003
- Stringfield J.M. “Assessing Tube Tensile Properties For Predicting Performance During Hydroforming” Colorado School of Mines 2001
- Sriram S. Wong C. Huang M. Yan B. Urban D. “Formability Characterization of a New Generation of High Strength Steels” American Iron and Steel Institute Technology Roadmap Program Office Pittsburgh, PA 2003
- Goel A. Ray R.K. Murty G.S. “Bauschinger Effect in A Dual-Phase Steel” Scripta Metallurgica 17 1983 375 380
- Zhonghua L. Haicheng G. “Bauschinger Effect and Residual Phase Stresses in Two Ductile-Phase Steels: Part I. The Influence of Phase Stresses on the Bauschinger Effect” Metallurgical Transactions A 21 1990 717 724
- Ibrahim N. Embury J.D. “The Bauschinger Effect in Single Phase B.C.C. Materials” Materials Science and Engineering 19 1975 147 149
- Leslie W.C. The Physical Metallurgy of Steels McGraw Hill New York, NY, USA 1981 161
- Speer J.G. Private Communication May 2004
- Han K. Van Tyne C.J. Levy B.S. “The Effect of One and Two Strain Reversals on the Strain Hardening Behavior of Three Different Steels” Journal of Materials Processing Technology
- Sato K. Hira T. Yoshitake A. Gerlach J. Blümel K. “Techniques to Improve Springback Accuracy Using Finite Element Analysis” Proceedings of IDDRG International Deep Drawing Research Group 2004 Conference Kergen R. Keßler L. Langerrak N. Lenze F.-J. Janssen E. Steinbeck G. Stahleisen Verlag Düsseldorf, Germany 2004 95 103