This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Potential Driver Exposure to Halons and Alternative Agents from On Board Fire Suppression Systems in Stock Cars
Technical Paper
2004-01-3551
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
This paper presents a review of the regulatory, environmental, and health issues surrounding the use of halons as a fire suppressant and a summary of the recently completed Racecar Fire Suppressant Exposure Study by ICF Consulting, Inc., under contract with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (U.S. EPA, 2004a). In 2003 the EPA learned that the SFI Foundation Inc., the organization responsible for developing safety regulations and testing requirements for numerous Performance Racing Industry (PRI) sanctioning bodies, was revising its Quality Assurance Specification for On Board Fire Suppression Systems (SFI Specification 17.1). The previous Specification 17.1 required either halon 1211 or halon 1301 to be used in these systems. Halons are ozone-depleting substances (ODS) widely used in fire protection applications and whose production and use are controlled under the Montreal Protocol and the Clean Air Act (CAA). Emissions of halons lead to destruction of the earth's protective stratospheric ozone layer. Because halons are the most potent ozone depletors of the controlled ODS, the production and import of virgin halons1 was banned in the U.S. beginning in 1994. Since then, EPA has worked with industry and other affected organizations to develop, evaluate, and support adoption of alternatives to halons through EPA's Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program. Alternatives to halons are now available and used in many new applications that formerly depended on halons. With the availability of approved alternatives, EPA was concerned that the draft of the new SFI specification still allowed for the use of halons 1211 and 1301 and that the potential risk to the driver from exposure during a discharge directly into the driver's compartment had not been fully considered. To address these concerns, EPA prepared a scoping analysis of possible fire suppressant agent concentrations that could be reached in a typical stock car due to the release under various scenarios. The study was not meant to determine acceptable quantities of an agent to be used, but to serve as an example of the type of analysis EPA believes should be considered to minimize driver exposure to potentially high concentrations of the agent.
The stock car scenario was modeled after what EPA understood to be reasonable race car metrics for the National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing (NASCAR) circuits and the agents included halons 1211 and 1301 as well as SNAP approved alternatives. This application was chosen because of the similarity in the dimensions of the driver's compartments of the stock car and truck body models to those of many other sanctioning bodies. From our model, the results of the study indicated that an “as designed” release of 5 lbs. of halon 1211 or 1301 into the driver's compartment could potentially create concentrations that would kill the driver. For the alternatives, at least one agent could reach the necessary concentration for fire extinguishment within the driver compartment while not posing a risk to the driver in both the car and truck body types. In the event of a catastrophic release of all agent from the system into the driver compartment, every agent reviewed would produce a potentially lethal concentration for the driver under the conditions modeled.
The finished analysis was reviewed by experts at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Delphi Corporation, DuPont, 3M, and American Pacific, and their comments and the authors' responses are summarized in Appendix A. The results of this research have been presented to SFI as well as sanctioning bodies that use SFI's safety specifications. The goal is to promote the safe application of fire suppression agents, and the use of effective alternatives to halons 1211 and 1301.
Recommended Content
| Technical Paper | Recent Analyses of Toxicity and Environmental Impacts of In-Car Motorsports Fire Extinguishing Systems |
| Technical Paper | SUPPRESSION OF EXPLOSION AND FIRE IN AIRCRAFT |
| Technical Paper | Visibility from Motor Vehicles |
Authors
Citation
Scharfenberg, J. and Kenny, C., "Potential Driver Exposure to Halons and Alternative Agents from On Board Fire Suppression Systems in Stock Cars," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-3551, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-3551.Also In
References
- 3M 2003 Novec 1230 Fire Protection Fluid: Product Information 3M Inc. 2003
- DuPont 2003 2003
- NASCAR 2004 Memo 20-17: Personal Safety Equipment and Roll Bars National Association of Stock Car Auto Racing April 2004
- NFPA 2000 NFPA 2001 Standards for Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems 2000 Edition The Technical Committee on Halon Alternative Protection Options, National Fire Protection Association February 2000
- NFPA 1990 NFPA 12B Standard on Halon 1211 Fire Extinguishing Systems 1990 Edition The Technical Committee on Halogenated Fire Extinguishing Systems, National Fire Protection Association August 1990
- NFPA 1989 NFPA 12A Standard on Halon 1301 Fire Extinguishing Systems 1989 Edition The Technical Committee on Halogenated Fire Extinguishing Systems, National Fire Protection Association August 1989
- OSL 2004 2004
- Park, J. et al. 1998 Measurement of Air Exchange Rate of Stationary Vehicles and Estimation of In-vehicle Exposure Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology 8 1 65 78 January-March 1998
- Powsus 2004 2004
- SFI 2004 Specification 17.1: On Board Fire Suppression Systems SFI Foundation, Inc. March 2004
- UNEP 1987 The Montreal Protocol On Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer as adjusted and/or amended in London 1990, Copenhagen 1992, Vienna 1995, Montreal 1997, Beijing 1999 United Nations Environment Programme March 2000
- U.S. EPA 2004 Racecar Fire Suppressant Exposure Study U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2004
-
U.S. EPA 2004 The Process of Ozone Depletion U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2004
-
U.S. EPA 2004 The Effects of Ozone Depletion U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2004
- U.S. EPA 1993 Code of Federal Register 40 CFR Part 82 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1993
-
U.S. EPA 1988 Statement by Lee M. Thomas on U.S. Ratification of the Montreal Protocol U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 1988
- Wickham 2002 Status of Industry Efforts to Replace Halon Fire Extinguishing Agents U.S. Environmental Protection Agency March 2002