This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effects of Planar and Nonplanar Driver-Side Mirrors on Subjective Discomfort-Glare Responses Among Young and Old.
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 08, 2004 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
In this study, we evaluated subjective nighttime discomfort-glare responds on three different types of planar and non-planar driver-side mirrors on two age groups. Fifty-six individuals (28 young [18-35 years] and 28 old [65 years and over]) participated in this experiment. Subjective discomfort-glare rating scores on three different types of driver-side mirrors were assessed utilizing De Boer's rating scale in a controlled nighttime driving environment (laboratory ambient illuminant level - l lux with headlight turned off). Three driver-side mirrors included: planar (“flat mirror” - reflectance ratio of 39.12%) and nonplanar (“curved mirror” - reflectance ratio of 8.78% and “blue mirror” - reflectance ratio of 7.77%; R=1400mm). The results indicated that with the same glare level (as measured by angle of incidence and illuminance on the front of the eyes), older adults reported lower De Boer's rating scores (i.e. worse feelings of glare) than their younger counterparts. Furthermore, the results indicated that both young and older adults reported lower De Boer's rating scores (i.e. worse feelings of glare) for planar driver-side mirror than non-planar driver-side mirrors. These results suggest that older adults' criterion of discomfort-glare is more sensitive than their younger counterparts, and importantly, the non-planar driver-side mirrors can be beneficial in terms of reducing nighttime discomfort-glare for both the young and the elderly.
CitationLockhart, T. and Atsumi, B., "Effects of Planar and Nonplanar Driver-Side Mirrors on Subjective Discomfort-Glare Responses Among Young and Old.," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1092, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-1092.
- Administration on Aging 2000 Older Americans 2000: Key indicators of well-being Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics August 13 2001 world wide web: http://www.agingstats.gov
- Federal Highway Administration 1978 Highway Statistics 1977 United States Department of Transportation Washington, DC
- Federal Highway Administration 1999 Highway Statistics 1998 United States Department of Transportation Washington, DC
- Chu, X. 1994 The effects of age on driving habits of the elderly: Evidence from the 1990 NPTS University of South Florida Center for Urban Transportation Research Tampa, FL
- Black, M.G. Rosenblum, W.M. 1987 “MTF Measurements on the Human Lens”
- Journal of the Optical Society of America 4 7
- Owsley, C. Ball, K. 1993 Assessing visual function in the older driver Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 9 389 401
- Schieber, F. Kline, D.W. Kline, T.J.B. Fozard, J.L. 1992 The Relationship Between Contrast Sensitivity and the Visual Problems of Older Drivers SAE Technical Paper No. 920613 Warrendale, PA Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc
- Luoma, J. Sivak, M. Flannagan, M.J. 1994 Effects of driver-side mirror type on lane-change accidents The Univeristy of Michigan Transportation Research Institute Report No. UMTRI-94-34
- Theeuwes, J. Alferdinck, J.W.A.M. Perel, M. 2002 The relation between glare and driving performance Human Factors 44 1 95 107