This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Knock Behavior of a Lean-Burn, H2 and CO Enhanced, SI Gasoline Engine Concept
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 08, 2004 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Experiments were performed to identify the knock trends of lean hydrocarbon-air mixtures, and such mixtures enhanced with hydrogen (H2) and carbon monoxide (CO). These enhanced mixtures simulated 15% and 30% of the engine's gasoline being reformed in a plasmatron fuel reformer . Knock trends were determined by measuring the octane number (ON) of the primary reference fuel (mixture of isooctane and n-heptane) supplied to the engine that just produced audible knock.
Experimental results show that leaner operation does not decrease the knock tendency of an engine under conditions where a fixed output torque is maintained; rather it slightly increases the octane requirement. The knock tendency does decrease with lean operation when the intake pressure is held constant, but engine torque is then reduced. When H2 and CO are added to the mixture, the knock susceptibility is reduced, as illustrated by a decrease in the measured octane number of the primary reference fuel resulting in knock. Experiments conducted with the addition of H2 and CO separately show similar trends, but to a lesser degree; therefore, both H2 and CO act as octane enhancers when added to a hydrocarbon-air mixture. The extent to which H2 and CO improve the knock resistance of a mixture can be estimated by finding the bond-weighted octane numbers for these non-traditional blends of fuels.
To understand these results better, a reduced chemical kinetic model was also used to predict autoignition of the end-gas for various conditions and fuel-air mixtures. Predicted model trends of knock onset of primary reference fuels agree with experimental observations. A comprehensive isooctane chemistry mechanism was used to demonstrate that H2 and CO are effective in lengthening the ignition delay, thereby reducing knock tendency.
- Jennifer A. Topinka - Sloan Automotive Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Michael D. Gerty - Sloan Automotive Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- John B. Heywood - Sloan Automotive Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- James C. Keck - Sloan Automotive Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
CitationTopinka, J., Gerty, M., Heywood, J., and Keck, J., "Knock Behavior of a Lean-Burn, H2 and CO Enhanced, SI Gasoline Engine Concept," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0975, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-0975.
New Spark Ignition Engine and Component Design, and Spark Ignition Combustion
Number: SP-1828 ; Published: 2004-03-08
Number: SP-1828 ; Published: 2004-03-08
- Bromberg, L., Cohn, D., Rabinovich, A., and Heywood, J., “Emissions reductions using hydrogen from plasmatron fuel converters,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, v 26, n 10, Oct. 2001, p 1115-21.
- Heywood, J., Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, 1988.
- Tully, E. and Heywood, J., “Lean-Burn Characteristics of a Gasoline Engine Enriched with Hydrogen from a Plasmatron Fuel Reformer,” SAE 2003-01-0630.
- Quader, A., Kirwan, J., and Greive. M., “Engine Performance and Emissions Near the Dilute Limit with Hydrogen Enrichments Using an On-Board Reforming Strategy,” SAE 2003-01-1356.
- Bromberg, L., Cohn, D., Rabinovich, A., Surma, J., and Virden, J., “Compact plasmatron-boosted hydrogen generation technology for vehicular applications,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, v 24, n 4, April 1999, p 341-350.
- Gruden, D., and Hahn, R., “Performance, Exhaust Emissions and Fuel Consumption of a IC Engine Operation with Lean Mixtures,” I Mech E Publication (C111/79), 1979.
- Quissek, F., Milulic, L., and Bandel, W., “Application of the AVL High Compression Lean Burn System to Passenger Car Engines,” SAE 885092.
- Stokes, J., Lake, T., and Osborne, R., “A Gasoline Engine Concept for Improved Fuel Economy - The Lean Boost System,” SAE 2000-01-2902.
- Betts, W., Gozzelino, R., Poullot, B., and Williams, D., “Knock and Engine Trends,” Coordinating European Council Second International Symposium, 1985.
- Russ, S., “A Review of the Effect of Engine Operating Conditions on Borderline Knock,” SAE 960497.
- Natkin, R., Ford Motor Company, Private Communication, June 2003.
- Tang, X., Heffel, J., et al., “Ford P2000 Hydrogen Engine Dynamometer Development,” SAE 2002-01-0242.
- Green, R. and Pearce, S., “Alternative Transport Fuel,” Energy World, pp. 8-11, October 1994.
- Glassman, I., Combustion, Academic Press, Inc., 1996.
- Hu, H. and Keck, J., “Autoigntion of Adiabatically Compressed Combustible Gas Mixtures”, SAE 872110.
- Keck, J. and Hu, H., “Explosions of Adiabatically Compressed Gases in a Constant Volume Bomb,” 21st International Symposium on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, 1986, pp 521-529.
- Cowart, J., and Heywood, J., “The Intensity of Knock in an Internal Combustion Engine: An Experimental and Modeling Study,” SAE 922327.
- Chun, K., Heywood, J., and Keck, J., “Prediction of Knock Occurrence in a Spark Ignition Engine,” 22nd International Symposium on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, pp 455-463, 1988.
- Tanaka, S., Ayala, F., and Keck, J., “A Reduced Chemical Kinetic Model for HCCI Combustion of Primary Reference Fuels,” Combustion and Flame, Volume 133, pp 467-481, 2003.
- Tanaka, S., Ayala, F., Keck J., and Heywood J., “Two-stage ignition in HCCI combustion and HCCI control by fuels and additives,” Combustion and Flame, Volume 132, pp 219-239, 2003.
- Curran, H., Gaffuri, P., Pitz, W., Westbrook, C., “A Comprehensive Modeling Study of iso-Octane Oxidation,” Combustion and Flame, Volume 129, pp 253-280, 2002.
- Fox, J., Cheng, W., and Heywood J., “A Model for Predicting Residual Gas Fraction in Spark-Ignition Engines,” SAE 931025.
- Topinka, J., “Knock Behavior of a Lean-Burn, Hydrogen-Enhanced Engine Concept,” MS Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT, 2003.
- Grandin, B., et al., “Heat Release in the End-Gas Prior to Knock in Lean, Rich, and Stoichiometric Mixtures With and Without EGR,” SAE 2002-01-0239.
- Chevron Technical Review, “Motor Gasolines,” 1996.