This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Optimization of the E-TEC™ Combustion System for Direct-Injected Two-Stroke Engines Toward 3-Star Emissions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 16, 2003 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
This paper describes important aspects of the development process for meeting CARB's “Ultra-Low” 3-Star emissions with engines using the new E-TEC™ direct injection system. In-house research and analysis of data from other state-of the-art engines were used to determine achievable emission levels and to set the development targets. A detailed mode-point-specific analysis of the emissions potential of the FICHT® direct injection system revealed excellent system capability in homogeneous operation and limited potential for stratified operation. Based on these results, the development work was focused on the reduction of stratified hydrocarbon emissions.
Wall impingement of the fuel spray onto the piston surface was identified as a major source of hydrocarbon emissions during stratified operation. A zero-dimensional simulation of various parameters affecting wall impingement indicates that droplet size, in-cylinder temperature, and penetration velocity are the three major factors. Droplet size was reduced drastically through the use of the new E-TEC™ voice-coil injectors with newly developed outwardly opening swirl nozzles. The in-cylinder temperature is increased with optimized air-flow and engine temperature management. The management of the fuel spray wall impingement was improved significantly by optimizing the splash bowl geometry in the piston surface.
KIVA spray simulations with different cylinder head geometries indicate that the design of the near nozzle area and especially the distance of the cylinder wall from the fuel spray are critical for optimal fuel spray development and mixture preparation. The near nozzle geometry was also found to have an effect on penetration velocity. An optimized combustion chamber location that maximizes the distance of the fuel spray from the walls reduced stratified emissions by up to 40% and resulted in an ICOMIA cycle emissions reduction of 18%.
The combination of the new E-TEC™ direct injection system with an optimized combustion chamber and improvements in near-nozzle geometry, injector targeting, piston splash bowl design, air-flow management, and mapping resulted in an overall emissions reduction of over 50% compared to the FICHT® direct injection system.
CitationStrauss, S., Zeng, Y., and Montgomery, D., "Optimization of the E-TEC™ Combustion System for Direct-Injected Two-Stroke Engines Toward 3-Star Emissions," SAE Technical Paper 2003-32-0007, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-32-0007.
- Coates, S.W. Lassanske, G.G. “Measurement and Analysis of Gaseous Exhaust Emissions - Recreational and Small Commercial Marine Craft” SAE Paper 901597
- Stanglmair, R.H. Roberts, C.E. Moses C.A. “Vaporization of Individual Fuel Drops on a Heated Surface: A Study of Fuel-Wall Interactions Within Direct-Injected Gasoline (DIG) Engines” SAE Paper No. 2002-01-0838
- Nhumaio, G.C.S. Watkins, A.P. “CFD Predictions in Model Engine - Reduction of In-Cylinder Wall Films by Using a Plain Orifice Electrostatic Atomizer” SAE Paper No. 2002-01-0840
- Kawajiri, K. Yonezawa, T. Ohuchi, H. Sumida, M. Katashiba, H. “Study of Interaction Between Spray and Air Motion, and Spray Wall Impingement” SAE Paper No. 2002-01-0836
- Warey, A. Huang, Y. Matthews, R. Hall, M. Ng, H. “Effects of Piston Wetting on Size and Mass of Particulate Matter Emissions in a DISI Engine” SAE Paper No. 2002-01-1140
- Befrui, B. Kneer, R. Breuer, S. Reckers, W. Robart, D. Wanlin, H. Weiten C. “Investigation of a DISI Fuel Injector for a Close-Arranged Spray-Guided Combustion System” SAE Paper No. 2002-01-1133
- Georjon, T. Bourguignon, E. Duverger, T. Delhaye, B. Voisard, P. “Characteristics of Mixture Formation and Combustion in a Spray-Guided Concept Gasoline Direct Injection engine: an Experimental and Numerical Approach” SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0534
- Cathcart, J. Zavier, C. “Fundamental Characteristics of an Air-Assisted Direct Injection Combustion System as Applied to 4-Stroke Automotive Gasoline Engines” SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0256
- Nakashima, T. Saito, K. Basaki, M. “A Study of Stratified Charge Combustion Characteristics in New Concept Direct Injection SI Gasoline Engine” SAE Paper No. 2001-01-0734
- Koch, T. Schaenzlin, K. Boulouchos, K. “Characterization and Phenomenological Modeling of Mixture Formation and Combustion in a Direct Injection Spark Ignition Engine” SAE Paper No. 2002-01-1138
- Turns, S. R. “An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications” McGraw-Hill 1996
- Senecal, P.K. Schmidt, D.P. Nouar, I. Rutland, C.J. Reitz, R.D. Corradini, M.L. Modeling High-Speed Viscous Liquid Sheet Atomization Int. J. Multiphase Flow 25 6-7 1073 1097 1999
- Houston, R. Archer, M. Moore, M. Newmann, R. “Development of a Durable Emissions Control System for an Automotive Two-Stroke Engine” SAE Paper No. 960361
- Bell. G. Finucci, C. “Exhaust Emissions Sensitivities With Direct Injection on a 50cc Scooter” SAE Paper No. 970365
- Maricq, M. M. Munoz, R. H. Yang, J. Anderson, R. W. “Sooting Tendencies in an Air-Forced, Direct-Injection, Spark Ignition (DISI) Engine” SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0255
- Meyer, J. Kiefer, K. von Issendorff, F. Thiemann, J. Haug, M. Schreiber, M. Klein, R. “Spray Visualization of Air-Assisted Fuel Injection Nozzles for Direct-Injection SI Engines” SAE Paper No. 970623
- Ghandhi, J. B. Felton, P. G. Gaideczko, B. F. Bracco. F. V. “Investigation of the Fuel Distribution in a Two-Stroke Engine With and Air-Assisted Injector” SAE Paper No. 940394
- Joh, M. Huh. K. Y. Noh, S. H. Choi, K. H. “Numerical Prediction of Stratified Charge Distribution in a Gasoline Direct-Injection Engine - Parametric Studies” SAE Paper No. 1999-01-0178