This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Approximating Engine Tailpipe Orifice Noise Sound Quality using a Surge Tank and In-Duct Measurements
Technical Paper
2003-01-1641
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Because of the need to safely vent exhaust gases, most engine dynamometer facilities are not well suited to measuring engine exhaust orifice noise. Depending on the location of the dyno facility within the building, the exhaust system may need to be extended in order to properly vent the exhaust fumes. This additional ducting changes the acoustic modes of the exhaust system which will change the measured orifice noise. Duct additions downstream of the original orifice location also alter the termination impedance such that in-duct pressure measurements with and without the extended exhaust system can vary significantly. In order to minimize the effect of the building's exhaust system on the desired engine exhaust system measurements, the present approach terminates the engine exhaust into a large enclosed volume or surge tank before venting the gases into the building's ventilation system. The large volume of the surge tank produces acoustic reflections similar to those of an orifice open to the atmosphere. Two pressure transducers upstream of the surge tank are used to separate out the forward and backward traveling acoustic waves in the duct and approximate the particle acceleration at the exhaust orifice location using linear acoustic assumptions. The radiated orifice noise is then estimated from the particle acceleration using a simple source model. Comparisons of this approximated orifice noise with the actual external measurements reveal that this method correctly captures trends in the dominant engine orders and predicts the amplitudes of these orders within about 5 dB.
Topic
Citation
Radavich, P. and Selamet, A., "Approximating Engine Tailpipe Orifice Noise Sound Quality using a Surge Tank and In-Duct Measurements," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1641, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-1641.Also In
SAE 2003 Transactions Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems
Number: V112-6; Published: 2004-09-15
Number: V112-6; Published: 2004-09-15
References
- ASTM 1990 ASTM E 1050-1990 “Standard test method for impedance and absorption of acoustical materials using a tube, two microphones, and a digital frequency analysis system.” American Society for Testing and Materials Philadelphia, PA
- Chung, J. Y. Blaser, D. A. 1980 “Transfer function method of measuring in-duct acoustic properties: I Theory.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68 907 913
- Jones, A. D. Brown, G. L. 1982 “Determination of two-stroke engine exhaust noise by the method of characteristics.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 82 3 305 327
- Landau, L. D. Lifshitz, E. M. 1959 Fluid Mechanics, Volume 6 of Course of Theoretical Physics Pergamon Press Oxford
- Munjal, M. L. 1987 Acoustics of Ducts and Mufflers John Wiley & Sons New York
- Selamet, A. Radavich, P. M. 1997 “The effect of length on the acoustic attenuation performance of concentric expansion chambers: an analytical, computational and experimental investigation.” Journal of Sound and Vibration 201 4 407 426