This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Efficiency, Dynamic Performance and System Interactions for a Compact Fuel Processor for Indirect Methanol Fuel Cell Vehicle
Technical Paper
2003-01-0810
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Fuel cell vehicles powered using Hydrogen/air fuel cells have received a lot of attention recently as possible alternatives to internal combustion engine. However, the combined problems of on-board Hydrogen storage and the lack of Hydrogen infrastructure represent major impediments to their wide scale adoption as replacements for IC engine vehicles. On board fuel processors that generate hydrogen from on-board liquid methanol (and other hydrocarbons) have been proposed as possible alternative sources of Hydrogen needed by the fuel cell.
This paper focuses on a methanol fuel processor using steam reformation of methanol to generate the Hydrogen required for the fuel cell stack. Since the steam reformation is an endothermic process the thermal energy required is supplied by a catalytic burner. Though a number of different designs for this type of fuel processor have been investigated, the general class of compact fuel processors characterized by close thermal integration of the burner and the reformer show the greatest promise for fuel cell vehicle applications.
Through the use of a model for the fuel processor, comprising of detailed models for the reformer, burner and CO cleanup units, we investigate the performance of the fuel processor from the viewpoints of efficiency and transient performance. In particular, the model can generate results in terms of a) steady state efficiencies b) response to transient step inputs c) Efficiency and dynamics in the context of its use in a fuel cell vehicle under standard driving cycles.
Our results illustrate the complex nature of the interaction between the fuel processor, the fuel cell stack and auxiliaries and the vehicle subsystem. In particular, they highlight a) the impact of fuel processor response times, b) the impact of control strategies, c) fuel processor-stack interactions, all, in the context of the ability of the vehicle to meet both the driving cycle and achieve high efficiencies. The results also suggest that steady state fuel processor efficiencies would not be very accurate predictors of fuel processor performance in an overall fuel cell vehicle.
Authors
- Sitaram Ramaswamy - Fuel Cell Vehicle Modeling Program, University of California, Davis
- Meena Sundaresan - Fuel Cell Vehicle Modeling Program, University of California, Davis
- Karl-Heinz Hauer - Fuel Cell Vehicle Modeling Program, University of California, Davis
- David Freidman - Fuel Cell Vehicle Modeling Program, University of California, Davis
- Robert M. Moore - Fuel Cell Vehicle Modeling Program, University of California, Davis
Citation
Ramaswamy, S., Sundaresan, M., Hauer, K., Freidman, D. et al., "Efficiency, Dynamic Performance and System Interactions for a Compact Fuel Processor for Indirect Methanol Fuel Cell Vehicle," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0810, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-0810.Also In
Fuel Cell Power for Transportation from the SAE 2003 World Congress on CD-ROM
Number: SP-1741CD; Published: 2003-03-03
Number: SP-1741CD; Published: 2003-03-03
References
- Geyer, H.K. et. al. “Dynamic Response of Steam-Reformed, Methanol-fueled, Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Systems” Proceedings of the 31 st IECEC 2 1101 1996
- “Fuel Processing Options for PEM Fuel Cell Systems for Mobile Applications” Dams, R.A.J. et al. 218 th ACS Meeting New Orleans August 22-26 1999
- “A Novel Compact Steam Reformer for Fuel Cells, With Heat Generation by Catalytic Combustion Augmented by Induction Heating” van Driel Marinus Meijer Marianne 1998 Fuel Cell Seminar Palm Springs Nov 16-19 1998
- “Structured Catalysts and Reactors” Cybulski, Andrzej Moulijn, Jacob A. 1998 New York Marcel Dekker, Inc. 151 2
- “Modeling a Catalytic Combustor for a Steam Reformer in a Methanol Fuel Cell Vehicle” Meena, S. et. al. IMECE 2000
- “Hydrogen Production by Steam Reforming of Methanol for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells” Amphlett, J.C. et. al. Journal of Hydrogen Energy 19 2 131 137 1994
- “Simulation Model for an Indirect Methanol Fuel Cell Vehicle” Hauer Karl-Heinz SAE FTT 2000 Costa Mesa