This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Comparison of Energy Use for a Direct-Hydrogen Hybrid Versus a Direct-Hydrogen Load-Following Fuel Cell Vehicle
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 03, 2003 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Hybridizing a fuel cell vehicle has the potential to improve the vehicle efficiency largely due to the ability to recover braking energy. However, tradeoffs do exist, and the advantages (in terms of potential fuel savings) are largely dependent on the drive cycle. The tradeoffs include added energy losses associated with the DC/DC converter and the battery pack itself. Additional tradeoffs not explicitly addressed in this study include added overall complexity, additional packaging constraints, and potentially higher overall cost.
This report will focus on a quantitative analysis of the performance of the direct-hydrogen (DH) hybrid and load-following fuel cell vehicles (FCVs) from the viewpoint of the energy use throughout the system. Specifically, the vehicle energy use and efficiency will be compared between the load following and hybrid vehicle platforms.
Several hybrid component configurations were studied. When the DC/DC converter is placed in the path of the fuel cell stack current, there does not appear to be much benefit, in terms of energy usage, in hybridizing the DH fuel cell vehicle. Specifically, on the US EPA cycles, the load following vehicle outperformed the hybrid on the HIWAY sequence, but the hybrid had slightly better results on the FUDS cycle. However, if the DC/DC converter is placed in the battery current path only, with the fuel cell stack directly connected to the electric drive train, the benefits in terms of improved fuel economy are larger than in the first configuration. This later configuration will be the design used for this study.
Overall, three main factors affect these vehicle results, all of which will be explicitly examined in this study. These factors are: vehicle weight, fuel cell system efficiency (including the battery), and regenerative braking capabilities. Specifically, the hybrid vehicle fuel economy was reduced due to a ∼10% heavier vehicle, and a lower overall system efficiency (when including the battery and DC/DC converter losses). The important factor, therefore, is the regenerative braking capability and whether this gain outweighs the added losses.
CitationCunningham, J., Moore, R., Ramaswamy, S., and Hauer, K., "A Comparison of Energy Use for a Direct-Hydrogen Hybrid Versus a Direct-Hydrogen Load-Following Fuel Cell Vehicle," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0416, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-0416.
- Hauer, KH, Moore, RM, Ramawamy, S, “A Simulation Model for an Indirect-Methanol Fuel Cell Vehicle,” Submitted to SAE Future Transportation Technology Conference, Costa Mesa, CA, August 21-23, 2000. SAE #2000-01-3083.
- Hauer, KH, Eggert, A, Moore, RM, Ramaswamy, S, “The Hybridized Fuel Cell Vehicle Model of the University of California, Davis,” SAE 2001 World Congress, Detroit, MI, March 5-8, 2001. SAE #2001-01-0543.
- Friedman, DJ, Eggert, A, Badrinarayanan, P, Cunningham, JM, “Maximizing the Power Output of an Indirect Methanol PEM Fuel Cell System: Balancing Stack Output and Air Supply/Water and Thermal Management Demands,” SAE 2001 World Congress, Detroit, MI, March 5-8, 2001. SAE #2001-01-0535.
- Friedman, DJ, “Maximizing Direct-Hydrogen PEM Fuel Cell Vehicle Efficiency: Is Hybridization Necessary?,” SAE World Congress, March 1-4, 1999, SAE #1999-01-0530, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1999.
- Santini, DJ, Vyas, AD, Kumar, R, Anderson, JL, “Comparing Estimates of Fuel Economy Improvement via Fuel-Cell Powertrains,” SAE 2002 Future Car Congress, Arlington, VA, June 3-5, 2002, SAE#2002-01-1947.
- Ruselowski, G, et al., “Well to Wheel Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems-NA,” Written by GM, ANL, BP, ExxonMobil, and Shell, April 2001.
- Springer, T, Zawodzinski, T, Gottesfeld, S, “Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Model”, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 138, No. 8, pp. 2334-2342, 1991.
- Contadini, Jose Fernando, “Life Cycle Assessment of Fuel Cell Vehicles - Dealing with Uncertainties,” Dissertation, University of California at Davis, May 2002.